search for: adressees

Hi, I have a issue with OpenSSH 3.7.1p2 and crontab (solaris 8). The crontab will not execute correctly the commands if I edit it by using OpenSSH. client (Solaris 8 / Openssh 3.7.1p2) ---> server (Solaris 8 / Openssh 3.7.1p2). Next, I edit the crontab with "vi" using a console session and I save it without doing modification. The crontab works perfectly now ! ? I have

We get caught occasionally, and we all receive spam; sorry for the last one (on R-help). Of course, there will never be a 100% sure prevention... Question is what should happen when mail from R-help to an adressee is refused with the following message : At least I won't be able to easily send e-mail to them {and am not willing to use a non-easy way}.... ----- Transcript of session

..._______ Protegeons ensemble l'environnement : avez-vous besoin d'imprimer ce courrier electronique ? ___________________________________________________________________________________ Les informations figurant sur cet e-mail ont un caractere strictement confidentiel et sont exclusivement adressees au destinataire mentionne ci-dessus.Tout usage, reproduction ou divulgation de cet e-mail est strictement interdit si vous n'en etes pas le destinataire. Dans ce cas, veuillez nous en avertir immediatement par la meme voie et detruire l'original. Merci This e-mail is intended only for use...

..._____ Protegeons ensemble l'environnement : avez-vous besoin d'imprimer ce courrier electronique ? ___________________________________________________________________________________ Les informations figurant sur cet e-mail ont un caractere strictement confidentiel et sont exclusivement adressees au destinataire mentionne ci-dessus.Tout usage, reproduction ou divulgation de cet e-mail est strictement interdit si vous n'en etes pas le destinataire. Dans ce cas, veuillez nous en avertir immediatement par la meme voie et detruire l'original. Merci This e-mail is intended only for use...

..._______ Protegeons ensemble l'environnement : avez-vous besoin d'imprimer ce courrier electronique ? ___________________________________________________________________________________ Les informations figurant sur cet e-mail ont un caractere strictement confidentiel et sont exclusivement adressees au destinataire mentionne ci-dessus.Tout usage, reproduction ou divulgation de cet e-mail est strictement interdit si vous n'en etes pas le destinataire. Dans ce cas, veuillez nous en avertir immediatement par la meme voie et detruire l'original. Merci. This e-mail is intended only for use...

..._______ Protegeons ensemble l'environnement : avez-vous besoin d'imprimer ce courrier electronique ? ___________________________________________________________________________________ Les informations figurant sur cet e-mail ont un caractere strictement confidentiel et sont exclusivement adressees au destinataire mentionne ci-dessus.Tout usage, reproduction ou divulgation de cet e-mail est strictement interdit si vous n'en etes pas le destinataire. Dans ce cas, veuillez nous en avertir immediatement par la meme voie et detruire l'original. Merci. This e-mail is intended only for use...

Hello; we are looking to replace our current PBX with a *-box; it is connected to ONE ppp isdn connection that is terminated by the NC. We got on this box 4 msn's configured. currently we are working with pstn fxo's behind the PBX; it works but we can't use the CSID information behind it. We want to migrate and keep the MSN's to decide routing in combination with the CID.

Hi all, i am stuck with the configuration of asterisk - modules are loaded ( zaptel and wct4xxp ) - i have zaptel.conf configure, output of ztcfg -vv --- snip -- rapid:~# ztcfg -vv Zaptel Configuration ====================== SPAN 1: ESF/B8ZS Build-out: 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) SPAN 2: ESF/B8ZS Build-out: 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) SPAN 3: ESF/B8ZS Build-out: 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet

Warning: newbie post I've scanned the archives and found some discussion of porting some code so it's integer based as opposed to floating point based. Has anyone looked at using Intel's Integrated Performance Primitives or their Math Kernel Library in an effort to optimize the code across all x86/XScale processors? IPP: http://www.intel.com/software/products/ipp/ipp30/ KML:

On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 12:05, Tyler Knott wrote: > One thing that is keeping Speex from being adopted is a lack of GUI > players. I think that Speex could benefit from an offial cross-platform > GUI player. The goal of the player should be to be stable, to the > point(no fluff like visualisations, playlists, an equaliser, etc.), self > contained(no external .DLLs, etc), and to

On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 13:49, Tyler Knott wrote: > Where can I find this? The main problem with this is that even though > there are wav players for other platforms they would need to have a > speex decoder as well. http://www.openacm.org and is an encoder/decoder in one package Remember, Ogg is the outer layer surrounding the speex content, like an envelope that holds a letter. >

hello everybody , i got a test setup with lanphone 101 connected to * and a welltech fxo 3802 also to * the extensions are configure so that i can dial from the lanphone to the fxo. although once on the FXO and having the dialtone, no of my dtmf dialing is being processed on the FXO. It keeps giving me the dialtone constatly. Everything is configured as outband DTMF (we

Hello asterisk-users, i got a simple read configured as an extensions command. it does not detect the dtmf digits all god 0123456789 gives something like 0223455789 what could this be the issue ? i'm using g711u law with inband. i tried to use outband but i got hardware like FXO's that don't support outband -- Best regards, Danny

Hello Asterisk, noticed that the mbrola really adds a extra dimension to tts; anyone got any experience with running this together with the festival and * ? -- Best regards, Danny mailto:dannyz@belgonet.com belGOnet.com a Euro-pictures division - internet solutions place princesse elisabeth 9/11 - 1030 Brussels - Belgium Tel : +32-(0)2-215.67.65 -

Recently, there're some posts about registration problems with this gateway. These are my observations using the latest firmware version 107a. a) The gateway will register all 4 ports if you're not using password. b) If using password, the gateway will only register the 1st port correctly. For the record, the 2-port 3502 doesn't exhibit this behavior. FYI.

>I don't think a player is what is required as much as hooks into existing >applications/players. > While those are good too the main purpose of a stand-alone player would be something that people could distribute with their files(which is why it should be small). When I say cross platform I mean that it could easily be ported and/or have as similar an interface as all the other

Hi everyone, I just released Speex version 1.0.1 with a major bugfix to the wideband mode. It's highly recommended for people using wideband Speex to upgrade. Also, since the old encoder and decoder had the bug, you may notice that files encoded with 1.0 have a lower quality when decoded with 1.0.1. For that reason, re-encoding might be a good idea. Note that narrowband is not affected by

On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 09:20, Greg Stovall wrote: > The problem, of course, is that using these libraries restricts one to > using Intel processors. AMD processors need not apply. While the > libraries run on AMD processors, the non-Intel processor is detected > and the optimizations are turned off. Can't say this is true on the > Athlon XP; I've not tried that processor

One thing that is keeping Speex from being adopted is a lack of GUI players. I think that Speex could benefit from an offial cross-platform GUI player. The goal of the player should be to be stable, to the point(no fluff like visualisations, playlists, an equaliser, etc.), self contained(no external .DLLs, etc), and to be small(500k or less) so that people with modems don't have to wait

<with Prof. Farnsworth voice> "Good News, everyone". I've just kicked off project "Sphinx". Which is supposed to sound like "Speex" merged with "INT". ;) Meaning I am working on an integer encoder and decoder. It looks like I will be pulling in a new "integer plumbing" into the foundation of the codec, comparing the results with the old