search for: adpaters

I am looking for completly wireless desktop phones. Until I realized we needed wireless i was going to use polycom soundpoint 501's. Any suggestions on a comparable wireless phone? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070328/88e22671/attachment.htm

All Any body know of a generic bluetooth adpater for the universal 2.5mm headset jack on a cell phone that supports the wireless profile *NOT* the headset profile I know jabra has the A210 http://www.jabra.com/JabraCMS/NA/EN/MainMenu/Products/Accessories/JabraA210/ JabraA210 but it only support the headset profile .. I am trying to shoe horn my current braindead cell into DocknTalk

I have actually came up the 3 approaches to build the post-ipo object independently. The "3rd approach" here is the 1st solution in my original proposal. Almost all coworkers call it sucks:-) Now I accept it because the it has no way to be adaptive. Consider the scenario we compile the llvm compiler. We use "make -j16" for computer with 8 processor, each make-thread invoke

Sean, thanks for reminding this, Alp did commit a class derived from raw_svector_ostream conatining an internal SmallString he called small_string_ostream. The commit was reverted after a day due to a disagreement about the commit approval and apparently abandoned. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140623/223393.html

after many mind storming, I finally release this walktrought for configure samba in an active directory (W2k3) environement. I hope that it will be usefull for someone. This procedure can be followed in any debian woody system, I think that it can be used in user systems, but I don"t test it. The attached configuration files are site specific for me but if you read the samba doc, you can

after many mind storming, I finally release this walktrought for configure samba in an active directory (W2k3) environement. I hope that it will be usefull for someone. This procedure can be followed in any debian woody system, I think that it can be used in user systems, but I don"t test it. The attached configuration files are site specific for me but if you read the samba doc, you can

I've noticed a growing number of stores using FRS radios. It would make sense to interface (via soundcard/console driver, with the nessacary electrical conversion) a VOX FRS radio to asterisk to allow someone in the office to page/talk with people on the floor or warehouse. You could throw that call (ie, all the radios) into a meetme conference. Then, you could have people in the office

Hi. I've recently picked up a 256MB compact flash card and CF->IDE adapter. I'm wanting to put a smaller version of knoppix on here. I came across miniknoppix here: http://www.inittab.org and decided to have a play around with that. So far I have opened up the ISO image and copied all the files out. I have put a boot sector onto the CF by putting the CF into the IDER adpater then

Thanks for the proposal. This is important work which is one step towards making LTO more applicable for large applications. Some comments inline. On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > > 3.1.1 Figure out Partition scheme > ---------------------------------- > we randomly pick up some function and put them in a partition. > It

I don't think we should make flush virtual. Why do you need to do it? Can't you set up the base class to write to use the tail of the memory region as the buffer? On 24 April 2015 at 06:46, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is this what you're thinking about? > The code is not tested yet, I'd like to know if the overall direction and >

I've just made an interesting observation that I'd like to share with you all: the popular Sipura SPA-2100 just doesn't seem to be as great as I'd hoped. I've been trying to get inbound AND outbound faxing working via Asterisk and at least one of my termination services: Voicepulse or Sixtel. In general, inbound has been working flawlessly but outbound has been pretty

A third approach is to decouple the backend compilation and parallelism strategy from the partitioning. The partitioning can spits out partition BC files and some action records in some standard format. All of this can be fed into some driver tools that converts the compilation action file into make/build file of the underlying build system of your choice: 1) it can simply a compiler driver that

Could you dig into why: + raw_ostream &write(unsigned char C) override { + grow(1); + *OutBufCur++ = C; + return *this; + } Is 3 times as fast as raw_svector_ostream? I don't see a good reason why that should be any faster than: raw_ostream &operator<<(char C) { if (OutBufCur >= OutBufEnd) return write(C); *OutBufCur++ = C; return *this; }

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > I have actually came up the 3 approaches to build the post-ipo object > independently. > > The "3rd approach" here is the 1st solution in my original proposal. Almost > all coworkers call it sucks:-) > Now I accept it because the it has no way to be adaptive. > > Consider the

+llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org The impact should be small as all the other streamers usually write directly to the memory buffer and only when out of buffer they call write(). OTOH, raw_svector_ostream (without a buffer) goes though write for every character or block it writes. It can work without virtual write() by overriding the existing virtual write_impl() but this is a slower code path for

Platform : Nehalem, official Intel x58 with Core i7 920 (dx58so) Main (Console): Nvidia 9500 GT PCI Express Secondary: Nvidia 8800 GTS PCI Express Yes, I binned the ASUS P6T due to bad VT-d support in the BIOS. With the latest BIOS from Intel, the dx58so has enable/disable for VT-d, ICH FLR and Interrupt Mapping! Helped a lot with getting this working ... Dom0: 2.6.18-xen0 (built from

Here's a performance testcase for the raw_svector_ostream patch. On my WIndows x64 machine it runs in 1010ms with the current code and in 440ms with the patch applies. Is this OK to commit? 2015-05-02 21:31 GMT+03:00 Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com>: > Following a hint from Duncan in http://llvm.org/pr23395, here is a > revised patch. Rather then introduce the

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39866 Summary: Incorrectly detects Analog outputs as TV out on Apple Cards Product: xorg Version: git Platform: PowerPC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at

+update diff 2015-05-02 7:38 GMT+03:00 Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com>: > I outlined (is that the right > word?) raw_char_ostream::grow, raw_char_ostream::write (both) into > raw_ostream.cpp with less than 10% difference in performance. > > Profiling reveals that the real culprit is the code line > > OS.reserve(OS.size() + 64); > > called from

On 12 July 2013 15:49, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, There: > > This is the proposal for parallelizing post-ipo stage. See the following > for details. > > I also attach a toy-grade rudimentary implementation. This > implementation can be > used to illustrate some concepts here. This patch is not going to be > committed. > >