search for: addressser

Hello, is it possible to set an IP address for RTP different than the one used for SIP? I want to use asterisk behind a sip proxy (opensips), but I was thinking if I could avoid having to run rtpproxy on the sip proxy server and let asterisk itself take care of it. So that: Asterisk SIP address : local ip address Asterisk RTP address : global ip address regards, takeshi -------------- next

Hi there! In the x86 disassembler I noticed an if-statement with a duplicated branch. Are these intended to be identical? Best regards, Nicolas Kaiser -- diff -ur llvm-2.8.orig/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c llvm-2.8/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c --- llvm-2.8.orig/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c 2010-05-06 22:59:00.000000000 +0200

there is an if-else code in X86DisassemblerDecoder.c that does exactly the same thing on both paths. so this patch removes the redundant path. thanks, Jun diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c b/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c index 20e61da..3932ea1 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c +++

On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> However, there isn't a personality function associated here. This conflicts with the fact that there's an LSDA associated with the function. It's not really feasible that there would be an LSDA but no personality function. > > GCC recently added support for this, i.e. a situation in which there are

Hi Bill, > If it's a matter of defaulting to the C personality function, then that should be a fairly easy change to make. I'll look into it, though it may take a backseat to other things that I have to do right now unless someone else wants to. I'll add this to the list of exception handling problems: it should be possible to write this level of simple eh code without a selector,

Hi Bill, > However, there isn't a personality function associated here. This conflicts with the fact that there's an LSDA associated with the function. It's not really feasible that there would be an LSDA but no personality function. GCC recently added support for this, i.e. a situation in which there are only cleanups to be run: it uses the C personality function even if the

The linker is going off in the weeds trying to parse the dwarf unwind info. The CIE has: Leh_frame_common_begin0: .long 0 ## CIE Identifier Tag .byte 1 ## DW_CIE_VERSION .asciz "zLR" ## CIE Augmentation .byte 1 ## CIE Code Alignment Factor .byte 120 ## CIE Data Alignment

Hi, If I type define i32 @main() gc "shadow-stack" { entry: %0 = alloca i8* %1 = call i8* @malloc(i64 1) store i8* %1, i8** %0 call void @llvm.gcroot(i8** %0, i8* null) ret i32 0 } declare i8* @malloc(i64) declare void @llvm.gcroot(i8**, i8*) nounwind in test.ll and then do > llc test.ll > gcc test.s I get the error ld: in

Hi, In file X86DisassemblerDecoder.c, we have function readPrefixes() with below code: ..... } else if (insn->mode == MODE_32BIT) { insn->registerSize = (hasOpSize ? 2 : 4); insn->addressSize = (hasAdSize ? 2 : 4); insn->displacementSize = (hasAdSize ? 2 : 4); insn->immediateSize = (hasOpSize ? 2 : 4); } .... This is confused to me: so we

This is an interesting problem. The GC code is being converted into 'invokes' instead of calls: define i32 @main() gc "shadow-stack" { entry: %gc_frame = alloca %gc_stackentry.main %gc_currhead = load %gc_stackentry** @llvm_gc_root_chain %gc_frame.map = getelementptr %gc_stackentry.main* %gc_frame, i32 0, i32 0, i32 1 store %gc_map* getelementptr inbounds (%gc_map.0*

Hi folks...!!! I´ve a problem that i did not solve it. i want to limit the DOWNLOAD to my hosts (upstream traffic for the firewall) using IMQ, If i classify by PORT (source or destination) all seems to be fine, but...BUT...if i want to restrict by IP addresss (internal IP address) i can´t do it, because my hosts go to Internet toward the firewall using NAT, so after NAT my IP address in

I looked at this briefly, I think it causes some mistakes that get reversed later in fixupReg. The disassembler design is a bit of a mess with regards to prefixes and operand size. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>

Hi All, Is it possible to establish site-to-site VPN using dynamic IP addresss assigned by ISP ? If yes, I would like to request a sample ipsec.conf for such scenario... Thanks and warmest regards aslay ################################################### # This message has been scanned for viruses and # # dangerous content by Pensteel Digital Solutions # # Open Source Security Server,

The page_to_phys is defined as #define page_to_phys(page) (phys_to_machine(page_to_pseudophys(page))) so it return machine addresss while virt_to_phys return psedophys. include/asm-xen/asm-i386/io.h this is really confusing. why not define page_to_machine? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi Is there a way i can use a diffent bind-addresss in yum . Thanks -- Regards Agnello D'souza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100329/74f8b8e4/attachment-0002.html>

I havent been able to find a email addresss for webpage problems. Please forward this email to the right person. The Swedish mirror se.samba.org hasnt been working for some time now. (connection refused) Could somebody please take at look at this problem. Regards Kenneth

Hi read.table in a table with numb of read elements not multiple of columns Avviso in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, : il numero di elemtni letti non ?? un multiplo del numero di colonne --> change "elemtni" to "elementi" Regards Luca

2 Samb4 DC's joined and replicating great. Hi I'm running some Linux scripts on DC2 which I copied from DC1. I changed the ldap://address for a script which I copied to DC2 to that of DC2. If I now deliberately failover DC1, the script on DC2 complains that the ldap addresss is invalid. Do I keep the scripts at the same ldap://address on BOTH DC's? Is, that correct? Cheers, Steve

Hi, I''ve developed a standalone Rails app - using tar2rubyscript and rubyscript2exe. The users aren''t going to understand that the''ll need to open the browser and go to 127.0.0.1:3000 to view the app, after running the exe. I am wondering whether other people have tackled this problem in the past, and how they went about solving it. One way would be to write a

To support reliability, I have 2 network connections from my win7 client to my home server. Both the server and the client have 2 **internal** 192.168.3.XXX addressses... Doing a reverse DNS lookup, on either of the interfaces will return the same hostname. Doing a forward DNS lookup on the hostname will randomly return one or the other (supposed to be able to prioritize, but when I do that,