search for: addressser

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 58 matches for "addressser".

Did you mean: addressses
2011 May 12
1
Different IP addresss for SIP and RTP
Hello, is it possible to set an IP address for RTP different than the one used for SIP? I want to use asterisk behind a sip proxy (opensips), but I was thinking if I could avoid having to run rtpproxy on the sip proxy server and let asterisk itself take care of it. So that: Asterisk SIP address : local ip address Asterisk RTP address : global ip address regards, takeshi -------------- next
2010 Dec 16
1
[LLVMdev] x86 disassembler: if-statement with redundant branch
Hi there! In the x86 disassembler I noticed an if-statement with a duplicated branch. Are these intended to be identical? Best regards, Nicolas Kaiser -- diff -ur llvm-2.8.orig/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c llvm-2.8/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c --- llvm-2.8.orig/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c 2010-05-06 22:59:00.000000000 +0200
2013 Sep 12
1
[LLVMdev] [patch] remove redundant code in X86DisassemblerDecoder.c
there is an if-else code in X86DisassemblerDecoder.c that does exactly the same thing on both paths. so this patch removes the redundant path. thanks, Jun diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c b/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c index 20e61da..3932ea1 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.c +++
2011 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> However, there isn't a personality function associated here. This conflicts with the fact that there's an LSDA associated with the function. It's not really feasible that there would be an LSDA but no personality function. > > GCC recently added support for this, i.e. a situation in which there are
2011 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
Hi Bill, > If it's a matter of defaulting to the C personality function, then that should be a fairly easy change to make. I'll look into it, though it may take a backseat to other things that I have to do right now unless someone else wants to. I'll add this to the list of exception handling problems: it should be possible to write this level of simple eh code without a selector,
2011 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
Hi Bill, > However, there isn't a personality function associated here. This conflicts with the fact that there's an LSDA associated with the function. It's not really feasible that there would be an LSDA but no personality function. GCC recently added support for this, i.e. a situation in which there are only cleanups to be run: it uses the C personality function even if the
2011 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
The linker is going off in the weeds trying to parse the dwarf unwind info. The CIE has: Leh_frame_common_begin0: .long 0 ## CIE Identifier Tag .byte 1 ## DW_CIE_VERSION .asciz "zLR" ## CIE Augmentation .byte 1 ## CIE Code Alignment Factor .byte 120 ## CIE Data Alignment
2011 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
Hi, If I type define i32 @main() gc "shadow-stack" { entry: %0 = alloca i8* %1 = call i8* @malloc(i64 1) store i8* %1, i8** %0 call void @llvm.gcroot(i8** %0, i8* null) ret i32 0 } declare i8* @malloc(i64) declare void @llvm.gcroot(i8**, i8*) nounwind in test.ll and then do > llc test.ll > gcc test.s I get the error ld: in
2014 Mar 31
2
[LLVMdev] registerSize on X86 confused?
Hi, In file X86DisassemblerDecoder.c, we have function readPrefixes() with below code: ..... } else if (insn->mode == MODE_32BIT) { insn->registerSize = (hasOpSize ? 2 : 4); insn->addressSize = (hasAdSize ? 2 : 4); insn->displacementSize = (hasAdSize ? 2 : 4); insn->immediateSize = (hasOpSize ? 2 : 4); } .... This is confused to me: so we
2011 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
This is an interesting problem. The GC code is being converted into 'invokes' instead of calls: define i32 @main() gc "shadow-stack" { entry: %gc_frame = alloca %gc_stackentry.main %gc_currhead = load %gc_stackentry** @llvm_gc_root_chain %gc_frame.map = getelementptr %gc_stackentry.main* %gc_frame, i32 0, i32 0, i32 1 store %gc_map* getelementptr inbounds (%gc_map.0*
2007 Jun 02
7
u32 classifier
Hi folks...!!! I´ve a problem that i did not solve it. i want to limit the DOWNLOAD to my hosts (upstream traffic for the firewall) using IMQ, If i classify by PORT (source or destination) all seems to be fine, but...BUT...if i want to restrict by IP addresss (internal IP address) i can´t do it, because my hosts go to Internet toward the firewall using NAT, so after NAT my IP address in
2014 Apr 02
2
[LLVMdev] registerSize on X86 confused?
I looked at this briefly, I think it causes some mistakes that get reversed later in fixupReg. The disassembler design is a bit of a mess with regards to prefixes and operand size. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>
2004 Aug 06
1
site-to-site with dynamic IP
Hi All, Is it possible to establish site-to-site VPN using dynamic IP addresss assigned by ISP ? If yes, I would like to request a sample ipsec.conf for such scenario... Thanks and warmest regards aslay ################################################### # This message has been scanned for viruses and # # dangerous content by Pensteel Digital Solutions # # Open Source Security Server,
2005 Sep 01
3
question about page_to_phys
The page_to_phys is defined as #define page_to_phys(page) (phys_to_machine(page_to_pseudophys(page))) so it return machine addresss while virt_to_phys return psedophys. include/asm-xen/asm-i386/io.h this is really confusing. why not define page_to_machine? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2010 Mar 29
1
yum to use different bind address
Hi Is there a way i can use a diffent bind-addresss in yum . Thanks -- Regards Agnello D'souza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100329/74f8b8e4/attachment-0002.html>
2003 Aug 09
1
Webpage problem with se.samba.org
I havent been able to find a email addresss for webpage problems. Please forward this email to the right person. The Swedish mirror se.samba.org hasnt been working for some time now. (connection refused) Could somebody please take at look at this problem. Regards Kenneth
2007 Oct 23
2
typo in italian translation (PR#10367)
Hi read.table in a table with numb of read elements not multiple of columns Avviso in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, : il numero di elemtni letti non ?? un multiplo del numero di colonne --> change "elemtni" to "elementi" Regards Luca
2012 Jul 29
1
Samba4: 2DC domain. Which ldap:// address do I use, DC1 or DC2?
2 Samb4 DC's joined and replicating great. Hi I'm running some Linux scripts on DC2 which I copied from DC1. I changed the ldap://address for a script which I copied to DC2 to that of DC2. If I now deliberately failover DC1, the script on DC2 complains that the ldap addresss is invalid. Do I keep the scripts at the same ldap://address on BOTH DC's? Is, that correct? Cheers, Steve
2006 Feb 14
7
Launching a standalone Rails app
Hi, I''ve developed a standalone Rails app - using tar2rubyscript and rubyscript2exe. The users aren''t going to understand that the''ll need to open the browser and go to 127.0.0.1:3000 to view the app, after running the exe. I am wondering whether other people have tackled this problem in the past, and how they went about solving it. One way would be to write a
2011 Oct 25
1
Dual interfaced computer...2 addrs for same hostname -- samba doesn't seem to like this?
To support reliability, I have 2 network connections from my win7 client to my home server. Both the server and the client have 2 **internal** 192.168.3.XXX addressses... Doing a reverse DNS lookup, on either of the interfaces will return the same hostname. Doing a forward DNS lookup on the hostname will randomly return one or the other (supposed to be able to prioritize, but when I do that,