search for: addcs

Hello, I set up a domain with two DCs (dns-backend is BIND9_DLZ) on a Debian 10 system. I used either the Debian-packages or the Packages from Louis (4.12.8). I created an Ansible-role to setup everything, starting from installing the packages over doing the provision/join up to change the settings for bind9. The first DC runs fine. After the reboot services are all present, allthe SRV Record for

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 14.48 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > > The cure is to STOP your windows clients trying to update their own > records. Yes, this is true, on windows I will stop this service. But my problem now is another The samba command samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately not work It's possible to resolve this

> > Yes, you have got it wrong ;-) :( If you do not want to add anything to AD, then you use the 'rid' > backend and 'ID' numbers will be calculated for you. You will also have > to place 'template' shell & homedir lines in smb.conf > If you want/need some of your users to have different login shells or > home directories, you will need to use the

Hello, For my backend, I define and use a CC register similiarly to the EFLAGS register in X86 (I call it CCFLAGS). But if I make all arithmetic/logic instructions affect it ('let Defs = [CCFLAGS] in...' in InstrInfo.td) I run into // The only case we should have a dead physreg here without a killing or // instruction where we know it's dead is if it is live-in to the function

Hi, I have to add a second DC to a Zone. I use the sernet packages Version 4.11 on a debian 10 host. The bind refuses to start: root at addc-zone02:~# systemctl status bind9 ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bind9.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2020-04-30 14:51:58 EEST; 5s ago Docs:

On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:57:15 +0100 Dario Lesca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 16.00 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba ha > scritto: > > The samba command > > > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately > > > > not work > > > Following this howto, >

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 12.07 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > Is the DHCP server updating the records for you ? Yes, but for now the problem is not dhcp (see follow) > If so, you need to stop the windows clients trying to update their > own records, they don't own them. I have the problem when join to domani via samba on another server, or when I run

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 11.29 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > Try changing the 'options' of named.conf to this: Thanks Rowland Integrated your suggested changes and restart samba and named Now my named.conf is this[1], but none is change: [ root at server-addc ~]# samba_dnsupdate --all-names --fail-immediately update failed: REFUSED dic 04

Il giorno mar, 25/04/2017 alle 14.36 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > However I would like to enable also the DHCP service, and think > > it's right to activate it on this server. > > > > What is the best way to do so? > > Well you could always do it the way I have been doing it for the last > 5 years, see here: > >

A physical register cannot be live across the block. So it must have a use in the block or it must be marked dead. From your dump, it looks like the CCFLAGS defs are not being marked dead. It's unclear where things went wrong, but you can step through LiveVariables to debug this. Evan On Jan 9, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Christian Sayer wrote: > Hello, > > For my backend, I define and

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 16.00 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba ha scritto: > The samba command > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately > > not work Following this howto, https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable#Verifying_That_the_BIND_AD_Account_Exists_for_the_DC I have try this: [ root at server-addc

Hello, If my AD will only provide service for machines with windows operating system I can use the *idmap config ADDC: backend = ad*, correct or did I get it all wrong? For both unix and windows machines I need *idmap config ADDC: backend = rid* ? Other question. *Wiki Prerequisites says:* "Users must have at least the uidNumber and groups the gidNumber attribute set. When using the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I try to set up a ADDC with bind9 and dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates. I followd the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_wi th_BIND9 My problem is, that the PTR Record will not be updated, because the script is using the wrong reverse-zone: - --------------------- Dez 26 17:30:05 addc-01 named[512]:

Thanks for the tip. I have still "zone has no NS records" This is the output (anonymized) of the script -- sorry, I will post it directly next time ;) Collected config? --- 2020-04-30-15:25 ----------- Hostname: addc-jor02 DNS Domain: example.com FQDN: addc-jor02.example.com ipaddress: 192.168.40.24 ----------- Kerberos SRV _kerberos._tcp.example.com record verified ok, sample

Il giorno mar, 25/04/2017 alle 13.26 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:07:05 +0200 > Dario Lesca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I have setup a new Samba Active Directory DC on Fedora 25 and > > samba- > > 4.5.8-1.fc25.x86_64, rebuild from src.rpm with dc option enable. > > > > This system

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello everybody, since the patch for all the badlock bugs it is not possible to access a Samba 4 ADDC-database with ldb-tools. Everytime I try it, I get the following error: root at addc-02:~# ldbsearch -H ldaps://addc-02.example2.net -U administrat or TLS failed to missing crlfile - with 'tls verify peer = as_strict_as_possible' When I

On 14/06/16 18:36, Juan Ignacio wrote: > Traducir del: Inglés > Ok, I have correctly configured the option to use RFC2307 in the > Actide Directory Domain Controller and the option on the member server. > > But anyway still showing bad UIDs. > > Here we show how both configurations are actualemente. > > Within RSAT I can place the UID attribute for example uanaco. >

Legalizer will expand arithmetics using addc and adde. Is it not working for you? It works fine on x86, you can take a look how it's done. Evan On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:03 AM, Richard Pennington wrote: > My target doesn't support 64 bit arithmetic, so I'd like to supply > definitions for adde/addc. The problem is I can't seem to figure out > the > magic. Here's

On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:34:37 +0100 Dario Lesca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 12.07 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha > scritto: > > Is the DHCP server updating the records for you ? > > Yes, but for now the problem is not dhcp (see follow) > > > If so, you need to stop the windows clients trying to update their >

On 5/30/2018 10:29 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev wrote: > For targets where ADDCARRY and SUBCARRY are legal, would it make sense > to expand ADDC/UADDO/ADDE/etc. into ADDCARRY (and same for sub)? SelectionDAG will never generate ADDC/ADDE on targets where they aren't legal.  Targets which custom-lower ADDCARRY generally also custom-lower UADDO; not sure what sort of expansion