search for: addc3

Dear list, in this corona crisis a delivery of a AD to a location abroad takes longer than I expected. I demoted the AD which is in delivery with samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=ADDC3 If I know trigger a samba-tool drs showrepl I still see him in the list: CN=Configuration,DC=example,DC=com ??? NTDS DN: CN=NTDS Settings\0ADEL:490b60eb-3616-4f02-87c2-32b6653bfa22,CN=ADDC3\0ADEL:d424f125-bca9-4d37-907b-4b83b5558197,CN=Servers,CN=location,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=example,D...

Hi, sorry to bother you: I have three AD in the domain. They all deliver different IDs: root at addc2:~# id testuser uid=3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) Gruppen=100(users),3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000036(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000014(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000001(BUILTIN\users) root at addc3:~$ id testuser uid=3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) Gruppen=100(users),3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000093(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000041(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000007(BUILTIN\users) root at addc3:~# id testuser uid=3000080(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) Gruppen=100(users),3000080(EXAMPLE\testu...

Hi Tim, What we did: setting "log level = 10" in smb.conf then exdcute the following command: ------ samba-tool domain backup online --server=addc3 --targetdir=/root -k yes >backup.txt 2>&1 ------ Then we grep for the message with "call_nt_transact_query_security_desc" ------ grep call_nt_transact_query_security_desc backup.txt ------ And got nothing :-( still the same errormessage about the missing access rights I will...

...; They all deliver different IDs: > > > > root at addc2:~# id testuser > > uid=3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) > > Gruppen=100(users),3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000036(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000014(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000001(BUILTIN\users) > > > > root at addc3:~$ id testuser > > uid=3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) > > Gruppen=100(users),3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000093(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000041(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000007(BUILTIN\users) > > > > root at addc3:~# id testuser > > uid=3000080(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=10...

...that replication was not instead succesful: > host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc01.dc.example.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc02.dc.example.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc3.dc.example.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc2.dc.example.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc03.dc.example.com Authentication on new DC actually fails (so we suppose no replication took place anyway). -- ?forumZFD Entschieden f?r Frieden...

..._tcp.example.com record verified ok, sample output: Server:??? ??? 192.168.20.22 Address:??? 192.168.20.22#53 _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-sub1.example.com. _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc2.example.com. _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc3.example.com. _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-sub2.example.com. _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-sub3.example.com. _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com. Samba is running as an AD DC ----------- ?????? Checking file: /etc/os...

Hi, thanks for your hints! Am 10.01.19 um 03:46 schrieb Tim Beale via samba: > - As a sanity-check, you could run 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck' > locally on your DC. It may tell you if there's an ACL problem. samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck doesn't show any problems. > - Instead of an online backup, try running 'samba-tool domain backup > offline' locally on

...ied ok, sample output: > Server:??? ??? 192.168.20.22 > Address:??? 192.168.20.22#53 > > _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-sub1.example.com. > _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc2.example.com. > _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc3.example.com. > _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-sub2.example.com. > _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-sub3.example.com. > _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com. > Samba is running as an AD DC > > -----------...

Hai, Great to hear i could help one with a gluster problem :-) And ofcourse your allowed to keep us up2date. So yes, plese, by doing that and sharing the configs it might help other people. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Benedikt Kale? via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 28 augustus 2019 17:37

Hello, We are setting up 2 AD machines: New machine with subnet 192.168.1.21: Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.buster Bind version 9.11.5 Existing machine 1 with subnet 192.168.2.21 Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3 Existing machine 2 with subnet 192.168.3.21? Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3 All with BIND_DLZ backend, same