search for: addc2

...RV-records worked. Then I set up a second DC also everything aut of the debian-box with bind9 as nameserver. The "join" and the replication of the database worked with no errormessage. BUT then I tested the DNS I saw that only the second DC got alle SRV-records: - ------------- root at addc2:~# host -t srv _kerberos._tcp.example.net _kerberos._tcp.example.net has SRV record 0 100 88 addc1.example.net. _kerberos._tcp.example.net has SRV record 0 100 88 addc2.example.net. root at addc2:~# host -t srv _ldap._tcp.example.net _ldap._tcp.example.net has SRV record 0 100 389 addc2.example.ne...

...DC also everything aut of the debian-box with > bind9 as nameserver. > > The "join" and the replication of the database worked with no > errormessage. > > BUT then I tested the DNS I saw that only the second DC got alle > SRV-records: > - ------------- > root at addc2:~# host -t srv _kerberos._tcp.example.net > _kerberos._tcp.example.net has SRV record 0 100 88 addc1.example.net. > _kerberos._tcp.example.net has SRV record 0 100 88 addc2.example.net. > > root at addc2:~# host -t srv _ldap._tcp.example.net > _ldap._tcp.example.net has SRV record 0...

Hello, I have the following problem with my bind9 together with samba 4.9 SerNet. If I start the bind9 I got the following error-message: --------------- Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=zfd,DC=forumzfd,DC=de Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: starting configure Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: zone 168.168.192.in-addr.arpa\010CNF:4fe640b0-6748...

Hai, ? Im seeing something very strange.? ( Debian wheezy, sernet-samba 4.1.14 ) ? after update-ing my debian servers and restarting them, im see-ing the following on my ADDC2. ? [2015/01/19 11:09:10.422641,? 0] ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) ? ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT ? I?checked the SOA's of the DNS and both are the same. And, besides above i see no errors, and as fare as i know...

Hi Rowland, Thank you for replying. Please find the output here below. Just a possible tip: _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com. output is present on the new machine but if we issue a host -t SRV _kerberos._tcp.example.com on addc2 it does not appear in the list. Kind regards. Collected config? --- 2019-12-18-20:30 ----------- Hostname: addc-new DNS Domain: example.com FQDN: addc-new.example.com ipaddress: 192.168.20.22 10.0.103.13 ----------- Kerberos SRV _kerberos._tcp.example.com record verified ok, sample output: Ser...

Hi, sorry to bother you: I have three AD in the domain. They all deliver different IDs: root at addc2:~# id testuser uid=3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) Gruppen=100(users),3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000036(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000014(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000001(BUILTIN\users) root at addc3:~$ id testuser uid=3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) Gruppen=100(users),3000133(EXAMPLE\testu...

...Hi Rowland, > > Thank you for replying. Please find the output here below. Just a > possible tip: > > _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com. > > output is present on the new machine but if we issue a host -t SRV > _kerberos._tcp.example.com on addc2 it does not appear in the list. > > Kind regards. > > Collected config? --- 2019-12-18-20:30 ----------- > > Hostname: addc-new > DNS Domain: example.com > FQDN: addc-new.example.com > ipaddress: 192.168.20.22 10.0.103.13 > > ----------- > > Kerberos SRV _kerb...

Dear list, in this corona crisis a delivery of a AD to a location abroad takes longer than I expected. I demoted the AD which is in delivery with samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=ADDC3 If I know trigger a samba-tool drs showrepl I still see him in the list: CN=Configuration,DC=example,DC=com ??? NTDS DN: CN=NTDS

On 19/01/15 10:30, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > > Im seeing something very strange. ( Debian wheezy, sernet-samba 4.1.14 ) > > after update-ing my debian servers and restarting them, im see-ing the following on my ADDC2. > > [2015/01/19 11:09:10.422641, 0] ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) > ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:294: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT > > I checked the SOA's of the DNS and both are the same. > And, besides above i see...

...xample.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc01.dc.example.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc02.dc.example.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc3.dc.example.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc2.dc.example.com > _ldap._tcp.dc.example.com has SRV record 0 100 389 addc03.dc.example.com Authentication on new DC actually fails (so we suppose no replication took place anyway). -- ?forumZFD Entschieden f?r Frieden|Committed to Peace Ilias Chasapakis IT-Systemadministrator Forum Ziviler F...

Hello, We are setting up 2 AD machines: New machine with subnet 192.168.1.21: Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.buster Bind version 9.11.5 Existing machine 1 with subnet 192.168.2.21 Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3 Existing machine 2 with subnet 192.168.3.21? Version 4.10.11-SerNet-Debian-10.stretch Bind version 9.10.3 All with BIND_DLZ backend, same

...Am 29.08.19 um 10:49 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 29/08/2019 09:36, Benedikt Kale? via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > sorry to bother you: > > > > I have three AD in the domain. > > > > They all deliver different IDs: > > > > root at addc2:~# id testuser > > uid=3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=100(users) > > Gruppen=100(users),3000155(EXAMPLE\testuser),3000036(EXAMPLE\TEAM1),3000014(EXAMPLE\gesch?ftsstelle),3000001(BUILTIN\users) > > > > root at addc3:~$ id testuser > > uid=3000133(EXAMPLE\testuser) gid=10...

Hai, Great to hear i could help one with a gluster problem :-) And ofcourse your allowed to keep us up2date. So yes, plese, by doing that and sharing the configs it might help other people. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Benedikt Kale? via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 28 augustus 2019 17:37