search for: ad_schema_version_support

For the moment, Samba4 cannot participate as DC with Windows 2019 servers (unless you downgrade to schema 47, the one that comes with Windows 2008R2): https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support The developers are working on Windows 2012R2 support.   So for now, anything above 2008R2 is experimental. On 2019-03-19 11:31 a.m., Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:14:41 -0300 > Edouard Guigné via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello Sam...

...omain member, I can't reach my server at all; it's not listed in the "Network", and accessing it directly either with \\servername or \\servername\share fails instantly (with an undefined, therefore completely unhelpful error 0x80004005). Now from https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support I see that Samba 4.13.13 (which I'm running) apparently can't manage an AD schema higher than Win2008R2 ... Could that be the source of my problems? Apparently I'd need Samba 4.19+ (though I don't know what sort of failures I'm supposed to encounter when running in an higher tha...

Unfortunately its an old setup that I’ve inherited from someone else. From what i understand there was originally a windows sbs server and this samba dc has replaced that. It was done when samba 4 was in early beta. Thanks for the link i found that thread but as you say it doesn’t help. Failing any kind of fix is there a way to import users/computers into a fresh database?

Hi everyone, I came across this issue today while upgrading a samba4 AD. The forest/domain level is 2008R2, however the schema partition is actually missing the msDS-isRODC attribute (and probably a few others). It makes the ADUC console to failed on that entry below. Here is the samba log message (which is quite explicit :-) Sep 28 16:55:36 srvads samba[27900]: [2016/09/28 16:55:36.819666,

...amba-tool returns the following error: DsAddEntry failed with status WERR_ACCESS_DENIED info (8567, 'WERR_DS_INCOMPATIBLE_VERSION') I read the documentation that specifies which version of Samba is compatible with the version of the Active Directory schema: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support I was able to check on the Windows 2012-R2 server that the Active Directory schema is in version 69, so theoretically compatible with Samba 4.7. User "MYDOMAIN\marcori" is a domain admin. Do you have a way to explore further? Respectfully, Marc-Henri Pamiseux PS: Here is the command...

...presa,dc=com,dc=br' -s base objectVersion # record 1 dn: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=empresa,DC=com,DC=br objectVersion: 44 # returned 1 records # 1 entries # 0 referrals I believe that the problem is related as the Samba 4 works with AD Schema, as found at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support Would anyone have an idea how to solve this problem? Regards, M?rcio Bacci

On 12.02.2019 11:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:28:44 +0500 > Шигапов Денис Вильданович via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I joined the windows 2019 domain, where among the controllers there >> is a Samba DC version 4.8.5, and after that the replica stopped >> working windows servers <--> samba DC. Upgrading to

Hai Barry, We know about exchange might be a problem, the others i dont know.. Check the windows schema levels. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support You could try a clean setup as shown by my howto. Before you install setup ip and hostname in the windows DNS for the linux server. Make sure you use a name thats never used before, just to be sure of no side effects. Then follow this to the letter. ( so use bind9_dlz ) https://github.com/...

...el, is there anyway I can force the schema upgrade to 2008R2 > independently of the samba-tool domain raise command line? > > Cheers, > > Denis > > > You could start by finding out just what schema version you actually have, see here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support Rowland

...se? Not sure if there is anything to dump the database, it would probably need something like the classicupgrade tool that is used to upgrade an NT4 domain. You may be able to work around this, it all depends on what schema version you have, see here to find out: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support If you have schema version 47, then it may just be a case of adding/changing a few attributes (I don't know which) and then running samba_upgradedns and then tidying AD. Of course this is very simplistic and may not work, I think somebody like Andrew needs to jump in here, he definitely knows...

...rch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b > 'cn=Schema,cn=Configuration,dc=my,dc=domain,dc=com' -s base objectVersion > # record 1 > dn: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=com > objectVersion: 47 No, '47' is 2008R2, see here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support Rowland

What is the compatibility level of samba-4-10.13? When I try to replicate Win2k12RC2 or Win2k16 I got everytime the error:DsAddEntry failed with status WERR_ACCESS_DENIED info (8567, 'WERR_DS_INCOMPATIBLE_VERSION') Thanks a lot. -- Dipl.-Ing. P?ter Varkoly Greuleinweg 37. D-90411 N?rnberg

Hi, I am trying to add a Windows server 2008 R2 as a DC on my domain running Samba 4.12.1 on Debian Buster. It fails complaining about incompatible domain level. root at sambadc:~/bin# samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=example,DC=tld' Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Lowest function level of a

...P; samba added that). So, if you have to migrate a (set of) NT domain(s) to samba, something can be done. If you have an AD domain on schema 88 and need to migrate to samba, i think you need first to 'downgrade' the schema to a samba supported schemas: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support and i think there's no way to downgrade schema... -- A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting....

...nal-levels > (3) > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Server_2012_/_2012_R2_DC_to_a_Samba_AD > > Viktor > > It is all down to the schema version support, Samba supports version 47 and experimentally version 69, more info here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support Rowland

...ng error: > DsAddEntry failed with status WERR_ACCESS_DENIED info (8567, > 'WERR_DS_INCOMPATIBLE_VERSION') > > I read the documentation that specifies which version of Samba is > compatible with the version of the Active Directory schema: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support > > I was able to check on the Windows 2012-R2 server that the Active > Directory schema is in version 69, so theoretically compatible with > Samba 4.7. > > User "MYDOMAIN\marcori" is a domain admin. > Do you have a way to explore further? > > Respectfully, >...

...ng error: > DsAddEntry failed with status WERR_ACCESS_DENIED info (8567, > 'WERR_DS_INCOMPATIBLE_VERSION') > > I read the documentation that specifies which version of Samba is > compatible with the version of the Active Directory schema: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support > > I was able to check on the Windows 2012-R2 server that the Active > Directory schema is in version 69, so theoretically compatible with > Samba 4.7. > > User "MYDOMAIN\marcori" is a domain admin. > Do you have a way to explore further? > > Respectfully, >...

> > I have been doing a bit of investigation and I 'think' we do have a tool > ;-) > Gooooooooddd!! :-) > If you examine 'samba_upgradedns', at the top it says this: > # Upgrade DNS provision from BIND9_FLATFILE to BIND9_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL > I think if you use it to upgrade to either BIND_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL, > it should create the required AD

Hello, We need to migrate our AD from NT PDC Schema Version 88 to Samba PDC, but we can't join our Samba to NT PDC or migrate SID History and Account Passwords to Samba PDC. Our company is over 3000 NT Servers and over 5000 Users and we need to migrate to Samba without Servers rejoin and Passwords reset, but it's very important for as to migrate. Is it possible that there will be

...t; # record 1 > dn: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=empresa,DC=com,DC=br > objectVersion: 44 > > # returned 1 records > # 1 entries > # 0 referrals > > I believe that the problem is related as the Samba 4 works with AD Schema, > as found at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AD_Schema_Version_Support > > Would anyone have an idea how to solve this problem? > > Regards, > > M?rcio Bacci