Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "acutlali".
Did you mean:
acutlaly
2018 Oct 03
3
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:15:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
> > implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet
> > another slightly different
2018 Oct 03
3
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:15:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
> > implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet
> > another slightly different
2018 Oct 04
2
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 03:32:08PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:01 PM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:15:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
2018 Oct 04
2
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 03:32:08PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:01 PM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:15:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
2018 Oct 03
4
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> writes:
> Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
>> implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet
>> another slightly different copy of the same
2018 Oct 03
4
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> writes:
> Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
>> implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet
>> another slightly different copy of the same
2018 Oct 03
0
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
> implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet
> another slightly different copy of the same code.
>
> Especially the extended switch case is problematic as the compiler
2018 Oct 03
0
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:01 PM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:15:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO
2018 Oct 04
0
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 9:43 AM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 03:32:08PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:01 PM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:15:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > > Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim,
2018 Oct 03
0
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 11:22:58AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> writes:
>
> > Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
> >> implementation,
2018 Oct 03
0
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
> On Oct 3, 2018, at 2:22 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org> writes:
>
>> Hi Vitaly, Paolo, Radim, etc.,
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
2018 Sep 14
24
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet
another slightly different copy of the same code.
Especially the extended switch case is problematic as the compiler tends to
generate a jump table which then requires to use retpolines. If jump tables
are disabled it adds yet another conditional to the existing
2018 Sep 14
24
[patch 00/11] x86/vdso: Cleanups, simmplifications and CLOCK_TAI support
Matt attempted to add CLOCK_TAI support to the VDSO clock_gettime()
implementation, which extended the clockid switch case and added yet
another slightly different copy of the same code.
Especially the extended switch case is problematic as the compiler tends to
generate a jump table which then requires to use retpolines. If jump tables
are disabled it adds yet another conditional to the existing