Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "actti".
Did you mean:
antti
2015 Jan 05
3
[LLVMdev] should AlwaysInliner inline this case?
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Pete Cooper <peter_cooper at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi lx, Philip
>
> I've seen an instcombine which helps with this situation. It fires when
> the function types on both sides of the bitcast have the same number of
> operands and compatible types. It then adds bitcasts on the arguments and
> removes the one on the called function.
>
It
2015 Jan 05
3
[LLVMdev] should AlwaysInliner inline this case?
Philip,
I post here because I think AlwaysInliner should inline it. I want to
detect the indirect calls for Inliner, and I want to hear inputs.
let me define indirect call first in my idea. In one single expression, one
function may be subject to bitcast more than one time. we can detect this
situation and treat it as a regular call of last function, is that okay?
thanks,
--lx
On Mon, Jan 5,