search for: acronym

Can you better this String acronym method? def acronym name letters=[] name.each_char {|char| letters<<char if char[0]>=65 and char[0]<=90} acronym = letters.join " " end chris -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

> On Feb 12, 2019, at 4:02 AM, Björn Pettersson A via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > (Sorry if this subject already has been discussed, but I could not find any clear rules/recommendations.) > > What would the recommendation be for acronyms (I’ve seen the rule about avoiding them unless they are “well known”, > but sometimes an acronym is useful, and we at least need to have some recommendation for the “well known” ones). > > Example: > > if (ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(V)) > if (CE...

Hello, is there an acronym method in php markdown extra ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20070306/e146240b/attachment.html

> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym. The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1. :) As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. > > In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anything anymore. I...

On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:05 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: >> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym. The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1. :) As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. >> >> In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anything any...

I would assume that the proper name in this case is constantExpr, and not CE. This is not really an acronym, but rather a shortcut taken for some unclear reason. > On 12. Feb 2019, at 13:02, Björn Pettersson A via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > (Sorry if this subject already has been discussed, but I could not find any clear rules/recommendations.) > > What woul...

...sage d'origine----- De : samba-bounces+gilbert.saliou=eds.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+gilbert.saliou=eds.com@lists.samba.org] De la part de JLB Envoy? : jeudi 3 mars 2005 17:55 ? : Gerald (Jerry) Carter Cc : Samba (E-mail); Gordon McCrae Objet : [Samba] OT: Is "Samba" an acronym? Is Samba an acronym? Below it's written in all-caps (i.e. "SAMBA"). Should it be thus? On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:50:41 -0600 > From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <jerry@samba.org> > To: Gordon McCrae <gordon...

On 2/18/2019 4:15 AM, Michael Platings via llvm-dev wrote: > Taking my previous example [1]: > > InnerLoopVectorizer LB(L, PSE, LI, DT, TLI, TTI, AC, ORE, VF.Width, IC, > &LVL, &CM); > > If we imagine that over time it evolves such that 50% of the variables have been renamed to camelBack versions of the type names, then it will look like this: > >

...in Wikipedia still uses the old explanation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Level_Virtual_Machine On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:05 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > >>> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym.  The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1.  :)  As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. >>> >>> In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anyth...

...gt; where meaning needs to be conveyed, otherwise they just obfuscate the > code needlessly. > > -Krzysztof > > On 2/12/2019 3:17 PM, Alex Denisov via llvm-dev wrote: >> I would assume that the proper name in this case is constantExpr, and not CE. >> This is not really an acronym, but rather a shortcut taken for some unclear reason. >> >>> On 12. Feb 2019, at 13:02, Björn Pettersson A via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> (Sorry if this subject already has been discussed, but I could not find any clear rules/recommen...

...nd I think we should standardize on one convention. All of the intrinsics have 'llvm.' as a prefix, and some also have some additional prefix 'llvm.dbg.', 'llvm.eh.', 'llvm.experimental.', etc., but after that we lose consistency. When there is just a single word (or acronym) everything is fine, but the way we join multiple words (or acronyms) falls into three categories: 1. No separator (e.g. @llvm.readcyclecounter) 2. Using '.' as a separator (e.g. @llvm.sadd.with.overflow) 3. Using '_' as a separator (e.g. @llvm.read_register) I propose that we...

...But this sounds inconsistent with " LLVM has little > to do with traditional virtual machines"? If so, if I am introducing > LLVM to people, do you want me to unfold LLVM as its full name, or use > LLVM directly? Thanks… Hi Jianzhou, "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym. The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1. :) As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anything anymore. It is a nic...

Hi LLVM, I have a question that is irrelevant to LLVM developing, but do not know where to post. I found the LLVM webpage uses the following new introduction of LLVM "The LLVM Project is a collection of modular and reusable compiler and toolchain technologies. Despite its name, LLVM has little to do with traditional virtual machines, ..." I remember the old webpage said that LLVM =

> I enjoyed the new coding style in recent patches. Camel case makes it easy > to pick a descriptive name. Starting functions and variables with lower > cases reduces chances to conflict with a type name. Honestly speaking, I don't. Especially in the cases when varname is made from an acronym. E.g. MachineInstr *MI looks much better than MachineInstr *mi, etc. See latest Rafael's patch as an example. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

TL;DR: change the rule for variable names from UpperCamelCase to lowerCamelCase. Just to get wider visibility on this, I'm raising this again as an RFC, as suggested by Roman Lebedev. My original post from last week is here and gives a rationale: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/129854.html. There seemed to be general agreement that the status quo is not ideal.

Dear R-community, maybe someone can help me with this: I've been using the loess() smoother for quite a while now, and for the matter of documentation I'd like to resolve the acronym LOESS. Unfortunately there's no explanation in the help file, and I didn't get anything convincing from google either. I know that the predecessor LOWESS stands for "Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing". But what does LOESS stand for, specifically? "Locally Weighted Expon...

The R-exts manual still says Note also that for running @LaTeX{}, the Debian @acronym{GNU}/Linux @acronym{CRAN} check systems use the Debian TeXLive at footnote{currently the long obsolete TeXLive 2009.} distribution (@uref{http://packages.debian.org/@/en/@/sid/@/texlive}); the Fedora and and what is in the footnote has not been true for quite some time as a visit to the URL...

...t turns out that underscore and camelize are not reversible in cases where there are 3 or more capital letters. As there is a dependency between class name and file name I think it would be beneficial for underscore to be reversible, however this would change the existing behavior of how it handles acronyms. Thanks, Rich C. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send em...

Hi Tim, Sorry, I'm not sure I follow. Are you maybe thinking that if the identifiers were tagged to specify scope, people would still be trying to use acronyms or single letters? So that, what in future code might be F, would instead be _f and that would be worse than f_ or s_f? I was thinking instead F would be (for new or modified code) _function or _fnctn or _func (as an object of type Function). Again, sorry -- I don't see how prepended unders...

...Michael Kruse via llvm-dev wrote: > * The library is named LLVMISL and contained in the lib/ISL folder to > work best with LLVM's component system. The component's name "ISL" was > chosen over "isl" as it matches the capitalization of other > two/three-letter-acronym components. Are the ISL sources themselve put into a namespace under llvm? That's my primary concern: a program wanting to use a random ISL version and LLVM at the same time. Joerg