Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "acpi_evaluate_dsm_typ".
Did you mean:
acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed
2017 May 04
0
[PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API
...B", &handle)))
> return false;
> - if (!acpi_check_dsm(handle, uuid, EXTLOG_DSM_REV, 1 << EXTLOG_FN_ADDR))
> + if (!acpi_check_dsm(handle, &uuid, EXTLOG_DSM_REV, 1 << EXTLOG_FN_ADDR))
> return false;
> - obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, uuid, EXTLOG_DSM_REV,
> + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &uuid, EXTLOG_DSM_REV,
> EXTLOG_FN_ADDR, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
> if (!obj) {
> return false;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drive...
2017 May 04
12
[PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API
...+ return false;
if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(NULL, "\\_SB", &handle)))
return false;
- if (!acpi_check_dsm(handle, uuid, EXTLOG_DSM_REV, 1 << EXTLOG_FN_ADDR))
+ if (!acpi_check_dsm(handle, &uuid, EXTLOG_DSM_REV, 1 << EXTLOG_FN_ADDR))
return false;
- obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, uuid, EXTLOG_DSM_REV,
+ obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &uuid, EXTLOG_DSM_REV,
EXTLOG_FN_ADDR, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
if (!obj) {
return false;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
index 784bda663d16..e8130a4873e9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus....
2016 May 19
2
[PATCH] gpu/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c: Fix Type Mismatch ACPI warning
...e = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER,
> - .buffer.length = 4,
> - .buffer.pointer = args_buff
> - };
> -
> - /* ACPI is little endian, AABBCCDD becomes {DD,CC,BB,AA} */
> - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> - args_buff[i] = (arg >> i * 8) & 0xFF;
> -
> *result = 0;
> obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, nouveau_op_dsm_muid, 0x00000100,
> - func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
> + func, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
The last parameter you give to `acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed()` is the return type
you expect (see [3]), which will be a buffer if func is 0, and is
implementa...
2015 May 25
15
[PATCH 1/8] acpi: Rename v1 DSM to mux to avoid ambiguity
...}
-static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg)
+static int nouveau_mux_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg)
{
int ret = 0;
union acpi_object *obj;
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg)
.integer.value = arg,
};
- obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, nouveau_dsm_muid, 0x00000102,
+ obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, nouveau_mux_dsm_muid, 0x00000102,
func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
if (!obj) {
acpi_handle_info(handle, "failed to evaluate _DSM\n");
@@ -153,30 +153,30 @@ static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_hand...
2015 May 25
2
[PATCH 5/8] acpi: Check returned object type by Optimus _DSM locally
...nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
> +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
> @@ -88,12 +88,12 @@ static int nouveau_evaluate_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, u
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> args_buff[i] = (arg >> i * 8) & 0xFF;
>
> - obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, nouveau_op_dsm_muid, nouveau_op_dsm_rid,
> - func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
> + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, nouveau_op_dsm_muid, nouveau_op_dsm_rid,
> + func, &argv4);
> if (!obj) {
&...
2016 May 20
0
[PATCH] gpu/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c: Fix Type Mismatch ACPI warning
...er = args_buff
> > - };
> > -
> > - /* ACPI is little endian, AABBCCDD becomes {DD,CC,BB,AA} */
> > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> > - args_buff[i] = (arg >> i * 8) & 0xFF;
> > -
> > *result = 0;
> > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, nouveau_op_dsm_muid,
> 0x00000100,
> > - func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
> > + func, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
>
> The last parameter you give to `acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed()` is the return
> ty...
2017 May 04
0
[PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API
...E(0x7ed873d3, 0xc2d0, 0x4e4f,
> + 0xa8, 0x54, 0x0f, 0x13, 0x17, 0xb0, 0x1c, 0x2c);
>
> static char *intel_dsm_port_name(u8 id)
> {
> @@ -80,7 +76,7 @@ static void intel_dsm_platform_mux_info(void)
> int i;
> union acpi_object *pkg, *connector_count;
>
> - pkg = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(intel_dsm_priv.dhandle, intel_dsm_guid,
> + pkg = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(intel_dsm_priv.dhandle, &intel_dsm_guid,
> INTEL_DSM_REVISION_ID, INTEL_DSM_FN_PLATFORM_MUX_INFO,
> NULL, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
> if (!pkg) {
> @@ -118,7 +114,7 @@ static bool intel_dsm_pci_probe(...
2017 May 04
0
[PATCH v1] ACPI: Switch to use generic UUID API
...p_uuid, DMAR_DSM_REV_ID, 1 << func);
> }
>
> static int dmar_walk_dsm_resource(acpi_handle handle, int func,
> @@ -1843,7 +1842,7 @@ static int dmar_walk_dsm_resource(acpi_handle handle, int func,
> if (!dmar_detect_dsm(handle, func))
> return 0;
>
> - obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, dmar_hp_uuid, DMAR_DSM_REV_ID,
> + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &dmar_hp_uuid, DMAR_DSM_REV_ID,
> func, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
> if (!obj)
> return -ENODEV;
DMAR part is
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
2015 May 28
12
[PATCH v2 1/9] acpi: Rename v1 DSM to mux to avoid ambiguity
...}
-static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg)
+static int nouveau_mux_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg)
{
int ret = 0;
union acpi_object *obj;
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg)
.integer.value = arg,
};
- obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, nouveau_dsm_muid, 0x00000102,
+ obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, nouveau_mux_dsm_muid, 0x00000102,
func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
if (!obj) {
acpi_handle_info(handle, "failed to evaluate _DSM\n");
@@ -153,30 +153,30 @@ static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_hand...
2015 May 26
2
[PATCH 5/8] acpi: Check returned object type by Optimus _DSM locally
...nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
>>> @@ -88,12 +88,12 @@ static int nouveau_evaluate_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, u
>>> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
>>> args_buff[i] = (arg >> i * 8) & 0xFF;
>>>
>>> - obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, nouveau_op_dsm_muid, nouveau_op_dsm_rid,
>>> - func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
>>> + obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, nouveau_op_dsm_muid, nouveau_op_dsm_rid,
>>> + func, &argv4);
&g...
2015 Jan 17
0
[PATCH RFC] nouveau: Add support for Gmux _DSM method
...f[4];
+ union acpi_object argv4 = {
+ .buffer.type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER,
+ .buffer.length = 4,
+ .buffer.pointer = args_buff
+ };
+
+ /* ACPI is little endian, AABBCCDD becomes {DD,CC,BB,AA} */
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+ args_buff[i] = (arg >> i * 8) & 0xFF;
+
+ *result = 0;
+ obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, nouveau_gmux_dsm_muid, 0x00000101,
+ func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
+ if (!obj) {
+ acpi_handle_info(handle, "failed to evaluate _DSM\n");
+ return AE_ERROR;
+ } else {
+ if (obj->buffer.length == 4) {
+ *result |= obj->buffer.pointer[0];
+ *result |=...
2018 Nov 28
0
4.20.0-rc3 nouveau/Quadro P2000 Mobile: runpm causing ACPI errors, lockups
...ming I'm reading it right).
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c::nouveau_optimus_dsm()
union acpi_object argv4 = {
.buffer.type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER,
.buffer.length = 4,
.buffer.pointer = args_buff
};
...
obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &nouveau_op_dsm_muid, 0x00000100,
func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
It passes ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER but ACPI spec _DSM expects package.
> > > [ 3.971745] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007)
> > > [ 3.97...
2018 Nov 28
2
4.20.0-rc3 nouveau/Quadro P2000 Mobile: runpm causing ACPI errors, lockups
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> +linux-acpi
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:53:26PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > So a new thinkpad:
> > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP107GLM [Quadro P2000 Mobile] (rev a1)
> >
> > Hangs whenever I try to poke at the card. It starts happily
2014 Mar 22
16
[Bug 76475] New: Nouveau fails to load due to unknown opcode 0x80
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 76475
Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: Nouveau fails to load due to unknown opcode 0x80
QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
Reporter: patrick.clara at
2018 Nov 28
2
4.20.0-rc3 nouveau/Quadro P2000 Mobile: runpm causing ACPI errors, lockups
...ouveau/nouveau_acpi.c::nouveau_optimus_dsm()
>
> union acpi_object argv4 = {
> .buffer.type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER,
> .buffer.length = 4,
> .buffer.pointer = args_buff
> };
>
> ...
>
> obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &nouveau_op_dsm_muid, 0x00000100,
> func, &argv4, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
>
>
> It passes ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER but ACPI spec _DSM expects package.
Yea all this is weird, in particular I wonder why does everyone
using dsm insists on sayi...