search for: acknoledgement

Hi: Anybody have the iptables line to match ack? iptables -t mangle -A QoS_Test -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK ACK -m length --length :128 I try this but it''s not working for me. Best regards. Sebastián A. Aresca

Hello, I tried to boot the new syslinux.efi (32bit) from the released syslinux 6 via PXE. In a wireshark trace I can see that the syslinux.efi was loaded successfully via TFTP. Then the client try to load ldlinux.e32. I see the request and also the acknoledgement in the trace. After that the client try to load the file, but the source port is changed to tftp request port + 1. For example: Source Destination Protocal SPort DPort Description 10.0.0.100 10.0.0.1 tftp 1479 69 Read Request: File /syslinux/ldlinux.e32, Trans...

Hallo, I'm trying to run two seperate live audio streams on my Redhat 8 box. I've got two sound devices that linux (begrudgingly) acknoledges. I can get Ices2 to run off of the onboard sound solution but there seems to be alot of interference, however, when I try to use the PCI-card (a C-Media chipset) it takes a lot time to connect from a remote client and there is no sound coming

Hello, I just would like to let you know that after investigating a while, it seems to me that the vmlinuz kernel ( Centos 5.6 Xen ) tftp transfer is hanging because there look to be some buffer overflow on the client side because after a while ( more or less 50Kb transfer ) , there is no more acknoledgment coming back from the client even in the last syslinux distribution revision

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Dan Gohman wrote: > > In this email, I argue that LLVM IR is a poor system for building a > > Platform, by which I mean any system where LLVM IR would be a > > format in which programs are stored or transmitted for subsequent > > use on multiple underlying

> > Have you tried 5.10 in your environment on a BIOS machine to see whether > that works and which port numbers it uses? > > -- > Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center > Hi Matt, I think I've found the problem. In /core/fs/pxe/tftp.c in function tftp_open: First you do a core_udp_connect to port 69 (TFTP) at line 264. -> source port = x After that

On Oct 4, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Talin wrote: > > LLVM isn't actually a virtual machine. It's widely acknoledged that the > > name "LLVM" is a historical artifact which doesn't reliably connote what > > LLVM actually grew to be. LLVM IR is a compiler IR. > > It sounds like you're picking a very specific definition of what a VM is. LLVM certainly

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 4, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Talin wrote: > > > LLVM isn't actually a virtual machine. It's widely acknoledged that the >> > name "LLVM" is a historical artifact which doesn't reliably connote what >> > LLVM actually grew to be. LLVM IR is a compiler IR.

On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Dan Gohman wrote: > In this email, I argue that LLVM IR is a poor system for building a > Platform, by which I mean any system where LLVM IR would be a > format in which programs are stored or transmitted for subsequent > use on multiple underlying architectures. Hi Dan, I agree with almost all of the points you make, but not your conclusion. Many of the

On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 19:24, adam leigh wrote: > Hallo, > > I'm trying to run two seperate live audio streams on my Redhat 8 box. I've got > two sound devices that linux (begrudgingly) acknoledges. I can get Ices2 to > run off of the onboard sound solution but there seems to be alot of > interference, however, when I try to use the PCI-card (a C-Media chipset) it >

Does the MWI feature work with IAX2? I have read where it should but cannot get the indicator to work on any of the IAX softphones that I have tried which have this feature. I even did an IAX debug and did not see where and indication was sent to the phone when it registered. IAX2 registration session: *CLI> Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: REGREQ

...Szerencsits wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to boot the new syslinux.efi (32bit) from the released > syslinux 6 via PXE. In a wireshark trace I can see that the > syslinux.efi was loaded successfully via TFTP. Then the client try to > load ldlinux.e32. I see the request and also the acknoledgement in the > trace. After that the client try to load the file, but the source port > is changed to tftp request port + 1. Have you tried 5.10 in your environment on a BIOS machine to see whether that works and which port numbers it uses? -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

On Tue, 25 Jun, at 01:51:52PM, Michael Szerencsits wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I think I've found the problem. Thanks for doing this analysis. > In /core/fs/pxe/tftp.c in function tftp_open: > First you do a core_udp_connect to port 69 (TFTP) at line 264. -> source port = x > After that you sent the filerequest at line 265 > You receive the fileinfo and also the used port

> Isn't the server complaining because port 7012 is unreachable? Not the > other way around? It really doesn't matter to the server what the value > of the source port is from the client. > > Looking at your network packet dump from a previous email, > > Source Destination Protocal SPort DPort Description > 10.0.0.100 10.0.0.1 tftp 1479

Hi... I am new to Wine... so I went from running to Solitaire to Running ColdFusion studio grin. I installed CFS by running the setup from CD using wine. All seemed to go OK, but when I try to run the application I get this error.... 0806a430:fixme:win32:PE_CreateModule Unknown directory 15 ignored and it bombs out... any ideas ?? Help ?? Thanks Benj.

In this email, I argue that LLVM IR is a poor system for building a Platform, by which I mean any system where LLVM IR would be a format in which programs are stored or transmitted for subsequent use on multiple underlying architectures. LLVM IR initially seems like it would work well here. I myself was once attracted to this idea. I was even motivated to put a bunch of my own personal time into

Hi Guys, I have a need to alter the general timeout in Asterisk. I am wondering if this is something that is hard coded into Asterisk code or if there is a parameter that can be set somewhere. For outbound, I am using x. and hence unless I append a # sign, I would have to wait maybe 5 seconds or so for the call to go through. Is there anywhere in Asterisk that I can change this 5 seconds to

> On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 22:01, adam leigh wrote: > > > When broadcasting live media off of any sound card other than the primary > > (Default, aka: /dev/dsp) sound device I only end up broadcasting silence. > > so there's a connection to icecast being maintained and icecast shows a > stream with so many listeners (status.xsl) ? That's right. Icecast

Thank you for writing this. First, I'd like to say that I am in 100% agreement with your points. I've been tempted many times to write something similar, although what you've written has been articulated much better than what I would have said. When I try to explain to people what LLVM is I say "It's essentially the back-end of a compiler" - a job it does extremely well.

Unfortunately, ices2 isn't writing anything to the logs. I've got them on debug mode, but there still isn't anything being written to indicate it's having a known problem. As far as the interference goes, I've found that reducing the iGain and amping the input source seems to reduce the interfencence a good deal, at least, good enough such that it's only a low murmur in