search for: aciu

...l Message ----- From: "Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:57 AM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] patch for building llvm on Windows with MSVC 2008 > On Tue, 13 May 2008, Razvan Aciu wrote: >> These are the updated .sln and .vcproj files for building llvm with MSVC >> 2008. >> It turned out that the compiling errors were because these projects >> wasn't >> updated to reflect the actual status of the llvm files. >> I checked all the files...

"Razvan Aciu" <admin at kam.ro> writes: [snip] > The problem is with the gcc and binutils licence. This is GPL and [snip] I agree with Owen Anderson on this one (altough IANAL, etc). [snip] > In that respect, if someone can adapt the MASM templates to produce > NASM directives (it is th...

Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I made some more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I discovered: - from FSF it seems that packaging together a GPL application and a commercial one it is a corner case of licensing. Here is what they say: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive...

On Tue, 13 May 2008, Razvan Aciu wrote: > These are the updated .sln and .vcproj files for building llvm with MSVC > 2008. > It turned out that the compiling errors were because these projects wasn't > updated to reflect the actual status of the llvm files. > I checked all the files (removed, moved or added) a...

These are the updated .sln and .vcproj files for building llvm with MSVC 2008. It turned out that the compiling errors were because these projects wasn't updated to reflect the actual status of the llvm files. I checked all the files (removed, moved or added) and now they are ok. It compiles all targets from the first "Build Solution", both for Debug and for Release mode. You need

...Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing > > >> >> On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: >> >>> I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the >>> submitted >>> patches (mine or others) were applied. >>> So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? >>> >> >> Please provide me with a link t...

...nal Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing > > On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > >> I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the >> submitted >> patches (mine or others) were applied. >> So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? >> > > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be a...

On May 13, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I > made some > more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I > discovered: > For now, I think for a commercial developer who wants to create a > complete > compiler toolchain using l...

I tried to compile on Windows ( using the win32/llvm.sln in MSVC Express 2008 ) the new 2.3 branch and here are the results: 1. I needed to copy the file Configure.exe.embed.manifest to Configure.exe.intermediate.manifest . This is a bug from the previous llvm release (2.2) 2. I copied the file SimplifyLibCalls.cpp from lib/Transforms/Scalar to lib/Transforms/IPO. I think the position of

Yes, you are right. During my testings, I tried the llvm produced .S files with the gcc frontend and it compiled and linked them to the final executable. The problem is with the gcc and binutils licence. This is GPL and while this is ok for open source or for academic purposes, it can't be used on commercial projects. In fact one of the strong points of llvm (and clang) is its BSD like

> There's also then entire GNU toolchain, through MinGW and/or Cygwin. Which works perfectly right now without any extra tweaking :) -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

...c at nondot.org> >> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing >> >> >>> >>> On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: >>> >>>> I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the >>>> submitted >>>> patches (mine or others) were applied. >>>> So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? >>>> >>> >>>...

Razvan Aciu wrote: > As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into > account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in > the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for > the release. If I am wrong, please someone c...

On May 11, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tried to compile on Windows ( using the win32/llvm.sln in MSVC > Express > 2008 ) the new 2.3 branch and here are the results: It would be great to get any windows improvements into the 2.3 release if possible. > 1. I needed to copy the file Configure.exe.embed.manifes...

I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the submitted patches (mine or others) were applied. So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya M. Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:00 PM Subject:

Hi Nuno, this can be a great project. Some PHP opcodes can be optimised a lot by llvm (like branches or function calls) while others like operations on variables can't be so easy optimized due to the dynamic nature of PHP. For the latest maybe you can use some automatic type inference, like the ones used in languages like Haskell, but this is is a big project and there are also mixed

...lled on customer's computers running Windoze. See my other thread. Owen Anderson wrote: > have you actually downloaded and built a copy of LLVM? > I'm going to guess that the answer is no LLVM fails to compile successfully in Microsoft Visual Studio 2008. See the email by Razvan Aciu. The point is that LLVM is difficult/awkward to use in a real-world situation in Windoze. This situation should be resolved. Look at what the sqlite.org project provides, for example.

...ely-GPL'd executables that are called via the command line, thereby avoiding the whole "infection" problem. This is, for instance, how Apple's developer tools can include a non- open source IDE like XCode which can still invoke gas. --Owen On May 13, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > Yes, you are right. During my testings, I tried the llvm produced .S > files > with the gcc frontend and it compiled and linked them to the final > executable. > > The problem is with the gcc and binutils licence. This is GPL and > while this > is ok for open s...

Just a reminder, please complete your testing by May 21st! Thanks, Tanya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 00:25:41 -0700 From: Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: 2.3 Pre-release available for testing LLVMers, The 2.3 pre-release is available for testing: