search for: ac_no_executables

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Henrik Bach wrote: > I can't figure what this means: > ------------------ > ... > checking for g++ that supports -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections... no > checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed > after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. > make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 > ------------------ I've never seen

Hi, John Chriswell wrote: >You might want to google for AC_NO_EXECUTABLES. It's an autoconf test that >generates the >behavior you describe. Apparently the GCC folks wrote a new >version of the macro due to the >above behavior. As suggested, I googled and found this interesting answer for above error and behavior: http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-bu...

Hi, I can't figure what this means: ------------------ ... checking for g++ that supports -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections... no checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 ------------------ Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source

...uot;libc"'s headers, then build the mingw equivalent of the libc. Here, the "libc" consists of import libraries (that are generated from symbol listings using llvm-dlltool) and static libraries, so libclang_rt isn't needed yet. (The autoconf scripts for these bits define AC_NO_EXECUTABLES, which avoids bailing out due to the compiler not being able to link an executable.) After this step, I build the compiler-rt builtins, and this is configured with -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER_WORKS=1 to (iirc) make it not bail out even though the toolchain still can't link anything. After building t...