search for: gcc_no_executables

Hi, I can't figure what this means: ------------------ ... checking for g++ that supports -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections... no checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 ------------------ Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Softwar...

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Henrik Bach wrote: > I can't figure what this means: > ------------------ > ... > checking for g++ that supports -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections... no > checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed > after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. > make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 > ------------------ I've never seen that before, sorry :( -Chris -- http://llvm.org/ http://nondot.org/sabre/

...sys/types.h... (cached) yes checking locale.h usability... yes checking locale.h presence... yes checking for locale.h... yes checking float.h usability... yes checking float.h presence... yes checking for float.h... yes checking for main in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 Googling, I found these links: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2005-January/003181.html http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-bugs at gcc.gnu.org/msg89727.html http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/day=20031023 So I've read some des...

Hello, Greg. You wrote Wednesday, May 10, 2006, 3:40:43 PM: GP> checking for main in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed GP> after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. If my memory serves me right, this message was due to something odd happened in gccld. Maybe supplied path was wrong or something like this. I've seen this bug before, but don't remember how I've fixed it. -- With best regards, Anton mailto:asl at math.spbu....

Hi, John Chriswell wrote: >You might want to google for AC_NO_EXECUTABLES. It's an autoconf test that >generates the >behavior you describe. Apparently the GCC folks wrote a new >version of the macro due to the >above behavior. As suggested, I googled and found this interesting answer for above error and behavior: http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-bugs at

Thank you, I did try that and got the following error: checking for library containing strerror... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. make[1]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ghoang/llvm-test/llvm-gcc-2.8-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 I also tried adding --disable-libiberty but make would fail even earlier with the following error: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ghoang/llv...

...dflap] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ghoang/llvm-test/llvm-gcc-2.8-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 To avoid this error, I tried adding the flag --disable-libmudflap and I got a new error: checking for library containing strerror... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. make[1]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ghoang/llvm-test/llvm-gcc-2.8-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 I also tried building version 2.9 but also encountered the same error. It seems that the setup of my system is missing some libraries. Any recomme...

...irectory `/home/ghoang/llvm-test/llvm-gcc-2.8-build' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > To avoid this error, I tried adding the flag --disable-libmudflap and I got > a new error: > > checking for library containing strerror... configure: error: Link tests are > not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. > make[1]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ghoang/llvm-test/llvm-gcc-2.8-build' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > I also tried building version 2.9 but also encountered the same error.  It > seems that the setup of my system is missing...

...cannot tell, why the win32 version of isValid() method fails when issuing a correct path on the mingw platform. This is especially annoying when configuring the cfrontend, because we get this misindicating error: 'checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.' And it has nothing to do with cross compilation. See this article for further explanation: http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-bugs at gcc.gnu.org/msg89727.html (6th paragraph). Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach LLVM Open Source Developer e-m...

On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Finally, will it be possible to provide an updated snapshot of the frontend, > so that I don't have to apply several patches to get it building? Sorry for the delay, yes, here you go: http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-23-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

On Jan 8, 2011, at 8:04 AM, akramul azim wrote: > Hi > > I am using LLVM and LLVM-GCC from SVN (version number: 122880). And I am using arm-2009q1-176-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-mingw32.tar.bz2 or arm-2007q3-51-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.bz2. I tried the automated scripts (create-snapshots.sh and build-install-linux.sh) that are in the LLVM repository for building

...cc/gcc/libgcc2.c:43: ./config/i386/i386.h:37:22: llvm-out.h: No such file or directory -------------- Copy missing header files: cp C:/projects/src/llvm-gcc-1/llvm-gcc/gcc/*.h gcc ============== On error: ============== checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. -------------- Solution: The llvm tools cannot handle dos paths correctly. ============== On error: ============== getruntime.c:54:23: sys/times.h: No such file or directory -------------- Either Solution: Make it explict with #UNDEF HAVE_TIMES in $objdir\i686-pc-mingw32\libiberty\config.h, beca...

Hi      I am using LLVM and LLVM-GCC from SVN (version number: 122880). And I am using arm-2009q1-176-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-mingw32.tar.bz2 or arm-2007q3-51-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.bz2. I tried the automated scripts (create-snapshots.sh and build-install-linux.sh) that are in the LLVM repository for building crosstoll for ARM

>>Does anyone know a source for a pre-built version of the same? > >To my knowledge there is no pre-built version of the cfe. See following link for CFE :- http://illuvium.com/download/ It maybe a bit out of date. I believe the CFE maybe broken at the moment, at least the Cygwin nightly test reports that it is broken and I believe this is the same thing ?