search for: abrahamyan

...kit does not support 64bits architecture :( I plan on > working on it, but in the meantime, maybe you can use a 32bit environment? > How it does become? Is this because of new incorporation of GC library not supporting 64bits? But I remember I was building VMkit with 64bits. Regards, Minas Abrahamyan

Hi Frederic, On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Frederic Perez Ordeig <fredericp at gmail.com > wrote: > Ah yes, thanks, this was one problem, now I hit another: > > llvm[2]: Building Release+Asserts mmtk-vmkit.jar all > Thread 0x110000000 received a SIGSEGV: either the VM code or an external > native method is bogus. Aborting... > ; 0x5cfeed (0x1100fe410) in

...running normally. Updating to the latest SVN version (revision 108831) didn't change anything (I was only a few days out of date). I'm not sure where to go from here. Does this fit with any of the known problems under 64-bit linux? Thanks, Joshua On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > $ j3 Hello > > j3: JavaClass.cpp:480: j3::JavaObject* j3::Class::doNew(j3::Jnjvm*): > > Assertion `(this->isInitializing() || > > classLoader->getCompiler()->isStaticCompiling()) && "Uninitializ...

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com> wrote: > Trying to build AOT version of vmkit java, > building for that classpath glibj.zip: > > $ cd vmkit/tools/vmjc/libvmjc > $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1 REQUIRES_FRAME_POINTER=1 > > has eventually, after 50 minutes, brought...

...n the selected classpath, and stores these methods in a bootimage, which it links statically with the main Avian executable. All I want to do is use the llvm code generation in place of the Avian JIT when making this aot-compiled boot image. Regards, Joshua On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > > I'm trying to use the Java front-end (which, based on svn commits, > appears > > to be three-years-dead), > > I'm trying to use llvm as a replacement aot compiler > > I'm not acquainted with the A...

...pments). To conclude, we were a little bit overloaded these last weeks and we have delayed the merge, but we will work on this soon (probably before the end of march). For the moment, you should use the VMKit2 repository as it's probably the most advanced one. See you, Gaël 2013/2/24 Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>: > Hi Harris, > > A question has arisen, what is the difference between VMKit2 and VMKit, > and why, in the first place the new VMKit2 fork was been created? > > Thanks for answer :) > > Best regards, > Minas > > > On Tue, Feb 12,...

Hi, Trying to build AOT version of vmkit java, building for that classpath glibj.zip: $ cd vmkit/tools/vmjc/libvmjc $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1 REQUIRES_FRAME_POINTER=1 has eventually, after 50 minutes, brought: <<< llvm[0]: Compiling glibj.zip to llvm llvm[0]: Optimizing glibj.zip llvm[0]: Compiling glibj.zip.bc to native UNREACHABLE executed! 0 llc

...JIT.cpp:1262:23: error: no member named 'removeFnAttr' in 'llvm::Function' llvmFunction->removeFnAttr( then I change to vmkit2, but found it's based on 3.2 only, failed compile with latest llvm > > See you, > Gaël > > > > 2013/2/24 Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>: >> Hi Harris, >> >> A question has arisen, what is the difference between VMKit2 and VMKit, >> and why, in the first place the new VMKit2 fork was been created? >> >> Thanks for answer :) >> >> Best regards, >> M...

Hi Allan, Thanks for the fix! So is this a bug in LLVM? Can you reduce that to a small test case and file a bug? Nicolas 2010/8/2 Allan Tong <actong88 at gmail.com> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Trying to build AOT version of vmkit java, > > building for that classpath glibj.zip: > > > > $ cd vmkit/tools/vmjc/libvmjc > > $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1 REQUIRES_FRAME_POINTER=1 > > > > h...

...version (revision 108831) didn't change anything > (I was only a few days out of date). > > I'm not sure where to go from here. Does this fit with any of the known > problems under 64-bit linux? > > Thanks, > Joshua > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Joshua, >> > $ j3 Hello >> > j3: JavaClass.cpp:480: j3::JavaObject* j3::Class::doNew(j3::Jnjvm*): >> > Assertion `(this->isInitializing() || >> > classLoader->getCompiler()->isStaticCompiling()) &amp...

Hi Harris, A question has arisen, what is the difference between VMKit2 and VMKit, and why, in the first place the new VMKit2 fork was been created? Thanks for answer :) Best regards, Minas On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Harris Bakiras <h.bakiras at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > For the moment you can install VMKit following these instructions: > >

...nge >> anything (I was only a few days out of date). >> >> I'm not sure where to go from here. Does this fit with any of the known >> problems under 64-bit linux? >> >> Thanks, >> Joshua >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi Joshua, >>> > $ j3 Hello >>> > j3: JavaClass.cpp:480: j3::JavaObject* j3::Class::doNew(j3::Jnjvm*): >>> > Assertion `(this->isInitializing() || >>> > classLoader->getCompiler()->i...

...few days out of date). >>> >>> I'm not sure where to go from here. Does this fit with any of the known >>> problems under 64-bit linux? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Joshua >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Joshua, >>>> > $ j3 Hello >>>> > j3: JavaClass.cpp:480: j3::JavaObject* j3::Class::doNew(j3::Jnjvm*): >>>> > Assertion `(this->isInitializing() || >>>> > classLoader...

...jc' make: *** [all] Error 1 >>> Solution: change USEDLIBS to: USEDLIBS = J3.a Classpath.a J3.a J3Compiler.a Allocator.a \ Mvm.a MvmCompiler.a $(GCLIB).a Allocator.a CommonThread.a Here J3.a and Allocator.a were repeated. After change it builds OK. Regards, Minas Abrahamyan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100714/23b09ed9/attachment.html>

Hi Joshua, > I'm trying to use the Java front-end (which, based on svn commits, appears > to be three-years-dead), > I'm trying to use llvm as a replacement aot compiler I'm not acquainted with the Avian JVM, but haven't you considered using VMkit llvm project, it contains .class/.jar to llvm compiler, also JIT compiler(native code compiler) and aot compiler. And

...y <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Allan, > Thanks for the fix! So is this a bug in LLVM? Can you reduce that to a small > test case and file a bug? > Nicolas > 2010/8/2 Allan Tong <actong88 at gmail.com> >> >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Trying to build AOT version of vmkit java, >> > building for that classpath glibj.zip: >> > >> > $ cd vmkit/tools/vmjc/libvmjc >> > $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1 REQUIRES_FRAME_POINTER...

Hi Joshua, > $ j3 Hello > j3: JavaClass.cpp:480: j3::JavaObject* j3::Class::doNew(j3::Jnjvm*): > Assertion `(this->isInitializing() || > classLoader->getCompiler()->isStaticCompiling()) && "Uninitialized class > when allocating."' failed. > Aborted Regarding to j3 in 64 bit version, it should work now after we've found crush reason, both in

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Joshua Warner <joshuawarner32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Minas, > > I tried recompiling Classpath with -fno-omit-frame-pointer, and now, instead > of printing an error message, j3 just segfaults in > "j3::JnjvmClassLoader::loadClassFromAsciiz(char const*, bool, bool) ()" > Could you please run it under gdb like $ gdb --args ./j3

...gt; >>>> I'm not sure where to go from here. Does this fit with any of the known >>>> problems under 64-bit linux? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Joshua >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Joshua, >>>>> > $ j3 Hello >>>>> > j3: JavaClass.cpp:480: j3::JavaObject* j3::Class::doNew(j3::Jnjvm*): >>>>> > Assertion `(this->isInitializing...

...ere. Does this fit with any of the >>>>>> known problems under 64-bit linux? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Joshua >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Minas Abrahamyan < >>>>>> minas.subs at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Joshua, >>>>>>> > $ j3 Hello >>>>>>> > j3: JavaClass.cpp:480: j3::JavaObject* >>>>>>> j3::Class::doNew(j3::J...