search for: a_3

...ign.*Same thing i have done using agi and database,i never use queue management on this scenario. Agent** can also shuffling one campaign to anther campaign. * Now i want to do some work with queue.I want to use single queue to managing this. Eg: campaign Agent Login A a_1,a_3 (In campaign A 2 agents are login) B a_2,a_1 (In campaign B 2 agents are login) C a_3,a_1,a_4 (In campaign C 3 agents are login) D a_4,a_5,a_3 (In campaign D 3 agents...

Hi all, I have n independent variables A_1, A_2, A_3,......,A_n, and each with known variances var(A_1), var(A_2),..., but unknown mean. How can I get the approximation of the variance of the product of the variables using numerical computation, i.e. var(A_1*A_2*A_3*.....*A_n)? Thanks. Sincerely, Yanwei Zhang Department of Actuarial Research and Mod...

Hello, I am looking into description of surf.ls(spatial) and see under value $beta - the coefficients. When I use polynomial of degree 2 to fit surface I expect to get 4 coefficients: z = a_1 x^2 + a_2 xy + a_3 y^2 + a_4 What do beta really stand for and why do I get $beta vector of length 6? Thakns, Mark

When you say that distribution shouldn't be used, do you mean within instcombine rather than some other pass? Or not all as an IR optimization? A dedicated optimization pass that looks for and makes factoring/distribution folds to eliminate instructions seems like it would solve the problems that I'm seeing. Ie, I'm leaning towards the proposal here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41574

...y address in r1 endif: ld a,r1 print r1 LLVM after the LLVM optimizer turns things into SSA: - Do you get rid of the loads and stores? - In SSA there should be a phi node for a after the if statement. From looking at the original code, it seems that the phi statement should look like this: a_3 = phi(a_1,a_2,(*p_1)) Seems like you need to include something involving *p because it might alias the location for a. How do you handle this? >> - Is there a dataflow analysis framework in LLVM? > > No there isn't (intentionally). All of the optimizations in LLVM are > spar...

> On May 8, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > 1. The reassociate pass that exists right now was *originally* (AFAIK) written to enable CSE/GVN to do better. Agreed. The original mindset included a (naive) belief that going with a canonical form was better than teaching redundancy elimination to handle abstractions (as a matter

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Michelle Strout wrote: > Those of us working on the OpenAnalysis project have been looking at > LLVM recently (excellent job on the website BTW). Thanks! I'm just one of the many people who have worked on it though, the praise belongs to them as much as it does to me. :) > This includes researchers at Rice, Argonne, and LLNL. Great! > John Mellor-Crummey

...ent. > LLVM after the LLVM optimizer turns things into SSA: > - Do you get rid of the loads and stores? Yes. > - In SSA there should be a phi node for a after the if statement. From > looking at the original code, it seems that the phi statement should > look like this: > a_3 = phi(a_1,a_2,(*p_1)) > Seems like you need to include something involving *p because it might > alias the location for a. How do you handle this? Yes, though alias analysis. The optimized version of the above function is: int %test(int %B, int %C, bool %Z, int* %P) { entry: ; No...

...b_9NQ1AUapKOsnS`-myvS8y-4K&$B%A zHSgFs_B9WE%RA=AzU85d-29NoF7nU?ZqDVg3p{k5Ti@{Tc^*2&+lEi^P#qq1)Jvyw z_g2W$WW7)0&h<{A(>xJAO&HTf{*4e+2k~9Ut at DI9gVT-IFWXj60%2k^fpv<DA747h z3kzuR!(P-fKh~{_+<#uCvn#F#F?fzA5E?kgWvlM{Qe9{;)di6XWlGp3Dn^OG=uA%g z(CIpyGrZ`E at onm)2`^UDd#?RngZGZtO?a_3;h*4R!c3x<3VKV4H at a(Dbgf6|UfnOb zJ!)!#=-cQ$lYIV(KIz3;@hQ2VFskWW_P({y8J;S-VjPA~?l^KuhtCjqv;PBx&tF3L zJQ1E#zZ1^&I^kre6W-n`wv9UBJg=KA;O at TcDd=W*#MY2~zL2L^Vm{*Jy#qp(xtp6w z{UP$<F5=|oYf{zOEc2OjeBGqDBxJ&3R~Fkh_TPkm-S31b-cFe=;qGqlO<vy~zze(o zICd+o4K*Y<w}?K7e1dV^AJ<vJKh;Ol?&am...