search for: a8s

Test case name : >> llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/matmul_f64_4x4.c - >> This is a 4x4 matrix multiplication, we can make small changes to make it a >> 3x3 matrix multiplication for making things simple to understand . >> > > This is one very specific case. How does that behave on all other cases? > Normally, every big improvement comes with

Motivation At the moment, when targeting armv7a, clang defaults to generate code as if -mcpu=cortex-a8 was specified. When targeting armv8a, it defaults to generate code as if -mcpu=cortex-a53 was specified. This leads to surprising code generation, by the compiler optimizing for a specific micro-architecture, whereas the intent from the user was probably to generate code that is

Hi all, I would like to call from SIP client to Asterisk then GnuGk, then Cisco 5300 to PSTN phone. Is this possible? I need simple config asterisk and gnugk.Can somebody help me? Ganbaa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040629/cfe09e1e/attachment.htm

Hi all, Thanks for the info. Few observations from my side : LLVM : cortex-a8 vfpv3 : no vmla or vfma instruction emitted cortex-a8 vfpv4 : no vmla or vfma instruction emitted (This is invalid though as cortex-a8 does not have vfpv4) cortex-a8 vfpv4 with ffp-contract=fast : vfma instruction emitted ( this seems a bug to me!! If cortex-a8 doesn't come with vfpv4 then vfma instructions

Thanks for everyone giving their feedback! I saw pretty unanimous support for making -mcpu=generic the default and making -mcpu=generic schedule for an in-order CPU (Cortex-A8 in this case). I'll be making those changes shortly. I think the comments also make clear that it's less obvious whether we'd want -mcpu=native to become a default. It's probably good for some use cases, but

Questions about the port of Xen to ARM with virt extensions are best posted to xen-devel, the xen-arm list focuses on the PV port. Adding xen-devel since it seems you are mainly asking about the w/-virt-extensions port. On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 12:38 +0100, Krishna Pavan wrote: > Please inform the status of Xen-ARM for Cortex-A8 CPU''s on FME from > ARM. AFAIK no one has tried the

I suspect that my llvm-gcc cross compiler is using the wrong assembler because it does not recognize "-mcpu=cortex-a8". I was trying to build a cross compiler for a Mac host. Now I am trying to build on x86_64 Linux. I am targeting a Beagle board with an ARM Cortex-A8 and Angstrom Linux. TRIED: to use the script in llvm/utils/crosstool/ARM/build-install-linux.sh I used the recommended

Turns out we used a misaligned long instruction near the end, and the shader was getting killed after writing R, A components. This has gone unnoticed since the remaining G, B outputs aren't actually used. --- src/nv50_accel.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/nv50_accel.c b/src/nv50_accel.c index 5fa539c..1218e18 100644 --- a/src/nv50_accel.c

Hi. Red Hat is saying that AMD Liano A8 CPU's are not supported by RHEL/CentOS 6: https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/articles/65431 Is that true? What can I expect if I try to install CentOS 6.3 on PC with that CPU? -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS,

On 19 December 2013 11:16, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > Test case name : > llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/matmul_f64_4x4.c - > This is a 4x4 matrix multiplication, we can make small changes to make it a > 3x3 matrix multiplication for making things simple to understand . > This is one very specific case. How does that behave on all

If this is the wrong list, please correct me, thanks. I'm trying to get a bit more information about the Arm backend for llvm. The precise processor I'm interested in is the TI OMAP3530 (the Cortex-A8 is the main CPU, along with other processors onboard the chip). I did see that the backend for Arm has support for the V6, but I'm thinking (I could be wrong) that the Cortex-A8 is

We have a wireless network that uses 802.1x authentication, in which domain joined computers use their machine credentials to connect. Windows machines do this automatically, and until recently Linux computers could join using wicd, wpa-supplicant, and a simple script that would retrieve the machine password with tdbdump. ( specifically tdbdump -k SECRETS/MACHINE_PASSWORD/DOMAIN

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 19 December 2013 08:50, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> It may seem that total number of cycles are more or less same for single >> vmla and vmul+vadd. However, when vmul+vadd combination is used instead of >> vmla, then intermediate results will be generated

> cortex-a8 vfpv4 with ffp-contract=fast : vfma instruction emitted ( this > seems a bug to me!! If cortex-a8 doesn't come with vfpv4 then vfma > instructions generated will be invalid ) If I'm understanding correctly, you've specifically told it this Cortex-A8 *does* come with vfpv4. Those kinds of odd combinations can be useful sometimes (if only for tests), so I'm not

Hi, I am trying to set up a bridge that connects 2 user mode linux (UML) machines. The bridge lets ARP traffic through, but not the IP traffic. linux:~ # brctl showmacs br0 port no mac addr is local? ageing timer 2 00:ff:7d:86:06:47 yes 0.00 3 00:ff:bc:de:07:76 yes 0.00 2 fe:fd:c0:a8:00:03 no

On Jul 2, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Neel Nagar wrote: > I suspect that my llvm-gcc cross compiler is using the wrong > assembler because it does not recognize "-mcpu=cortex-a8". This is a known problem. We've only added support for ARMv7 (including cortex-a8) in llvm in the last week or so, and the associated changes for llvm-gcc are still pending. Unless you need specific

I am currently working on support for the Cortex-A9, but as all compiler testing is more easily done on an Cortex-A8 today, A8 support is implicit. What specific ISA changes are you most interested in? Are you able to develop patches if we coordinate which areas to work on? deep On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: > If this is the wrong list,

hi My host is Linux on x86, and I want llvm-gcc generate code for Arm Cortex-A8. I saw that in LLVM 2.7 Release Notes, but I can't find step to build it. Anyone tell me? llvm-gcc now has complete support for the ARM v7 NEON instruction set. This support differs slightly from the GCC implementation. Please see the ARM Advanced SIMD (NEON) Intrinsics and Types in LLVM Blog

Dear friends Hope you all are fine. Suppose we have a list of arrays. a1=c(4,4,4,4,0,4,4,4,0,3,3,0,0,0,0,0); a1=array(a1,dim=c(4,4)); a2=c(4,4,4,4,0,4,4,4,0,3,3,0,0,0,0,0); a2=array(a2,dim=c(4,4)); a3=c(4,4,4,4,0,3,3,4,0,4,4,0,0,0,0,0); a3=array(a3,dim=c(4,4)); a4=c(4,4,4,4,4,0,3,3,3,3,0,4,4,4,0,0,0,0,0,0); a4=array(a4,dim=c(5,4)); a5=c(4,4,4,4,4,0,4,4,4,4,0,3,3,3,0,0,1,1,0,0);

Hello > My host is Linux on x86, and I want llvm-gcc generate code for Arm > Cortex-A8. > I saw that in LLVM 2.7 Release Notes, but I can't find step to build > it. Anyone tell me? Build llvm-gcc exactly the same way you're building the cross gcc for your target. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State