search for: a72

...ion speed? I think the main reason to be hesitant to change the default CPU for ARM to -mcpu=generic is the potential impact on performance of generated code. I've measured quite a wide selection of benchmarks with this change, on the following cores: Cortex-A9, Cortex-A53, Cortex-A57, Cortex-A72. Impact on execution speed, for each core, when using -march=armv7a, after changing the default cpu from cortex-a8 to generic is as follows. A positive numbers means speedup, a negative number means slow-down. These are the geomean results over 350 programs coming from benchmark suites such as the...

...ion speed? I think the main reason to be hesitant to change the default CPU for ARM to -mcpu=generic is the potential impact on performance of generated code. I've measured quite a wide selection of benchmarks with this change, on the following cores: Cortex-A9, Cortex-A53, Cortex-A57, Cortex-A72. Impact on execution speed, for each core, when using -march=armv7a, after changing the default cpu from cortex-a8 to generic is as follows. A positive numbers means speedup, a negative number means slow-down. These are the geomean results over 350 programs coming from benchmark suites such as the...

...backtestFormula<-SPX~A1+A2+A3+A4+A5+A6+A7+A8+A9+A10+A11+A12+A13+A14+A15+A16+A17+A18+A19+A20+A21+A22+A23+A24+A25+A26+A27+A28+A29+A30+A31+A32+A33+A34+A35+A36+A37+A38+A39+A40+A41+A42+A43+A44+A45+A46+A47+A48+A49+A50+A51+A52+A53+A54+A55+A56+A57+A58+A59+A60+A61+A62+A63+A64+A65+A66+A67+A68+A69+A70+A71+A72+A73+A74+A75+A76+A77+A78+A79+A80+A81+A82+A83+A84+A85+A86+A87+A88+A89+A90+A91+A92+A93+A94+A95+A96+A97+A98+A99+A100+A101+A102+A103+A104+A105+A106+A107+A108+A109+A110+A111+A112+A113 benchmarkName = as.character(backtestFormula)[2] print(as.character(backtestFormula)[3]) print(benchmarkName) assetsN...

Hello All, I need some help with respect to cross compiling for ARM. While trying to cross compile for the ARM target, I am hitting some errors. I need some help in this. I use the following command to cross compile for ARM Cortex A72 (ARM v8-a), 64 bit architecture: *cmake -v CC='clang' CXX='clang++' -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=../build_directory_llvm/bin/clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=../build_directory_llvm/bin/clang++ -DLLVM_TABLEGEN=../build_llvm_directory/bin/llvm-tblgen -DCLANG_TABLEGEN=../build_llvm_directory/bin/cla...

Hello, I’m using NXP layerscape Arch (A53/A72), and I want to use NE 10 Project library , and llvm compiler 3.8.1.1 (https://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/) <https://projectne10.github.io/Ne10/> When compiling the project file I get the following errors : ./NE10_abs.asm.s:59:9: error: unrecognized instruction mnemonic vmov...

...expressions introduced by instcombine. Benchmark Results ================= These are performance differences reported by LNT when running llvm-test-suite, spec2000, and spec2006 at -O3 with and without the patch linked above (using trunk llvm from a week or so ago). AArch64 results on ARM Cortex-A72: Performance Regressions - execution_time Change SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/Shootout-ary3 9.48% MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt 3.79% SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench...

Actually its the ccflags I am using with that particular distro. -mcpu=cortex-a72 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=neon-fp-armv8 -mneon-for-64bits Which is optimised for pi4 isn’t liked. Also without ccflag=”” configure: error: No 16 bit type found on this platform! ./configure --enable-neon --libdir=/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu I dropped down to ubuntu 18.04 and the same errors occur....

...air. There's nothing connecting the intrinsics to a given loop or any requirement that a set.loop.* call needs to be paired with a loop.end call. 2. Low-overhead loops in the Arm backend Disclaimer: The prototype is barebones and reuses parts of NEON and I'm currently targeting the Cortex-A72 which does not support this feature! opt and llc build and the provided test case doesn't cause a crash... The low-overhead branch extension can be combined with MVE to generate vectorized loops in which the epilogue is executed within the predicated vector body. The proposal is for this to be...

...nt. As an example, I have a test passing in the CI using the triple "aarch64v8.1a-unknown-linux-unknown", and "" for both CPU name and target features string. However when I pass the following target specific features string, I get qemu crashing in the CI: -a35,-a53,-a55,-a57,-a72,-a73,-a75,-a76,-aes,-aggressive-fma,-alternate-sextload-cvt-f32-pattern,+altnzcv,+am,-arith-bcc-fusion,-arith-cbz-fusion,-balance-fp-ops,+bti,-call-saved-x10,-call-saved-x11,-call-saved-x12,-call-saved-x13,-call-saved-x14,-call-saved-x15,-call-saved-x18,-call-saved-x8,-call-saved-x9,+ccdp,+ccidx,+c...

...============= > > These are performance differences reported by LNT when running > llvm-test-suite, > spec2000, and spec2006 at -O3 with and without the patch linked > above (using > trunk llvm from a week or so ago). > > AArch64 results on ARM Cortex-A72: > > Performance Regressions - execution_time           Change > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/Shootout-ary3                9.48% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt               >   3.79% > SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench  ...

...Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) From: Michael Maskalans <mindless at cif.rochester.edu> To: <problem at cif.rochester.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <003501c1e6f0$d4859bb0$ef441842 at yi0b4plk53mjqz> Message-Id: <71B00250-539A-11D6-A72E-00039303ECDC at cif.rochester.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Content-Length: 301 Status: RO X-UID: 326402 ) ========================== It looks like dovecot really isn't sending any information for message #1, starting right off at message #2. The headers it gives for mes...

...t;>> >>> These are performance differences reported by LNT when running llvm-test-suite, >>> spec2000, and spec2006 at -O3 with and without the patch linked above (using >>> trunk llvm from a week or so ago). >>> >>> AArch64 results on ARM Cortex-A72: >>> >>> Performance Regressions - execution_time Change >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/Shootout-ary3 9.48% >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt 3.79% >>> S...

Hi All I downloaded the binary package of Samba 2.2.2 on Friday from one of the Samba mirror sites, I think Belgium, and installed it on a Sun E450 running Solaris 2.6. Today everything has fallen flat on its face. Unfortunately I am on holiday this week so not able to deal with the problem directly, but via telephone calls. Apparently what is happening is that smbd is gobbling up all the

Hello R users, For the last few days I am struggling with the following task: my data.frame: A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 58.81 53.292 54.501 13.013 17.39 19.407 56.02 56.251 54.033 20.099 13.15 10.411 55.376 53.099 57.625 13.396 21.031 13.22 58.584 53.194 54.218 13.038 16.854 19.289 55.7 55.921 53.847 19.942 13.153 9.828 55.093 52.934

...4 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3 Thread(s) per core: 1 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 1 Vendor ID: ARM Model: 3 Model name: Cortex-A72 Stepping: r0p3 CPU max MHz: 1500.0000 CPU min MHz: 600.0000 BogoMIPS: 108.00 L1d cache: 128 KiB L1i cache: 192 KiB L2 cache:...