Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "_well_before_".
2005 May 19
1
RE: pronunciation? -- loving CentOS doesn't mean you have to bash Red Hat
...overall better overall lifecycle that RHEL promises and indeed,
> delivers. I could have gone down the Fedora route, but wasn't too
> thrilled with it's overall lifecycle.
How was it any different than when Red Hat announced it would no longer
support Red Hat Linux more than 1 year _well_before_ the Fedora Project
was announced or Red Hat Linux became Fedora Core?
I honestly don't blame Red Hat for not wanting to simultaneously support
6-7 revisions simultaneously. Dead beat companies who want to standardize
on a release for 2+ years should pay for it. Those of us who either "k...
2005 May 25
1
Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
...but then they taper off in preparation for the
.2 and 18 month EL series.
But even what I call CL4.0 (Fedora Core 2) wasn't nearly as much of a
shift as CL0.0 (Red Hat Linux 5.0), and still a bit better than CL2.0
(Red Hat Linux 7[.0]). One of my only complaint starting with Red Hat
Linux 9 (_well_before_ Fedora Core) is the lack of revisions to warn us of
".0" like shifts.
> Just because a developer writes some code and tacks on a higher
> version number doesn't mean it's ready for prime time.
Correct. I never said so and I have been _very_critical_ of Red Hat no
longer u...