search for: _users_

...te.pl', appears the following errors: [root@thor sbin]# smbldap-populate.pl Using builtin directory structure adding new entry: dc=maxwelleducacional,dc=com,dc=br failed to add entry: Insufficient access at /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-populate.pl line 273, <GEN1> line 2. adding new entry: ou=_USERS_,dc=maxwelleducacional,dc=com,dc=br failed to add entry: parent does not exist at /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-populate.pl line 273, <GEN1> line 3. adding new entry: ou=_GROUPS_,dc=maxwelleducacional,dc=com,dc=br failed to add entry: parent does not exist at /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-populate.pl line...

...rs is an IMAP folder, the mailbox file all mails had been appended together in the old times, when mbx or mbox mail storage format was common. In Germany many people use "Mailbox" as the collection of all IMAP folders of one account. So the question is why Dovecot accepts non-existant _users_ as you wrote in your last line. > I probably found the solution myself. Quoting RFC 4314: No, because of mailbox != Mailbox. - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBUwcGOnD1/YhP6VMHAQLsrQgArKBviwA4oHXpQSPHEj9hS+FgmV2pkO82 +3azectYRBh/srA...

...obey pam restrictions = No ldap passwd sync = Yes passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1 ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=domainname,dc=com # Ldap suffix ldap suffix = dc=clipper-group,dc=com ldap group suffix = ou=_GROUPS_ ldap user suffix = ou=_USERS_ ldap machine suffix = ou=_COMPUTERS_ ldap idmap suffix = ou=_USERS_ ldap ssl = no add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -m "%u" ldap delete dn = Yes delete user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-userdel.pl "%u"...

...100) not null, description text not null, user_id int not null, assignee int not null, date_due date not null, completed_at datetime not null, constraint fk_task_user foreign key (user_id) references users(id), constraint fk_task_assignee foreign key (assignee) references users(id), _Users_ id int not null auto_increment, username varchar(20) not null, password varchar(20) not null, full_name varchar(100) not null, email varchar(150) not null, primary key (id) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...obey pam restrictions = No ldap passwd sync = Yes passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1 ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=domainname,dc=com # Ldap suffix ldap suffix = dc=clipper-group,dc=com ldap group suffix = ou=_GROUPS_ ldap user suffix = ou=_USERS_ ldap machine suffix = ou=_COMPUTERS_ ldap idmap suffix = ou=_USERS_ ldap ssl = no add user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-useradd.pl -m "%u" ldap delete dn = Yes delete user script = /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-userdel.pl "%u"...

...population using smbldap-populate.pl, but when I run it, I'm getting: Using builtin directory structure adding new entry: dc=pirategames,dc=net failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-populate.pl line 323, <GEN1> line 2. adding new entry: ou=_USERS_,dc=pirategames,dc=net failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-populate.pl line 323, <GEN1> line 3. adding new entry: ou=_GROUPS_,dc=pirategames,dc=net failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/local/sbin/smbldap-populate.p...

...t; users will need to download a new program to use the repository, which > is a disincentive to using LLVM)? There you have it, this is what I find wrong with CVS on a day to day basis. If it's important enough to fix it is up to the oversight comittee to decide ;-) By the way, the LLVM _users_ are supposed to use the releases which are distributes as tarballs, and have no need to access the repository - The way I see it, it's the contributors who will need to download a new program... m.

...; $GID_START = 1000; $SID='S-1-5-21-725326080-1709766072-2910717368'; $slaveLDAP = "127.0.0.1"; $slavePort = "389"; $masterLDAP = "127.0.0.1"; $masterPort = "389"; $ldapSSL = "0"; $suffix = "dc=mydomain,dc=com"; $usersou = q(_USERS_); $usersdn = "ou=People,$suffix"; $computersou = q(_COMPUTERS_); $computersdn = "ou=$computersou,$suffix"; $groupsou = q(_GROUPS_); $groupsdn = "ou=$groupsou,$suffix"; $scope = "sub"; $hash_encrypt="SSHA"; $binddn = "cn=Manager,$suffix&quo...

...pache Linux-based web server use our existing NT domain to authenticate some of our web pages. We are using the Apache module mod_auth_pam to use pam-based authentication and then the winbind pam module to do the actual authentication. We have gotten to the point where we can authenticate using NT _users_, but we have not been able to authenticate using _groups_. For example, we can restrict a web page so that only the NT user "joeuser" can gain access to the page, but we have been unable to configure Apache so that any user of the NT group "SpecialAccess" (of which joeuser is a...

...sed windows but I remember Perforce as being _much_ more pleasant than CVS in that environment.) ...respectively. *Everyone else*, i.e. those: - who are only trying to download the code to have a play, and don't even want to think about "which branch do I need??" - who are LLVM _users_ in a very strict sense of the word (e.g. folks using it as a GCC-replacement) - who for whatever reason are just fine with CVS and don't want to change .. continue to use CVS. The gotcha, of course, is that it will take a little effort to maintain CVS but I wonder if some of that effort...

Dovecot 2.2.9-1 accepts SETACL commands that share mailboxes to non-existent mailboxes. There is no error message. Is this intended behavior? I think it's bad because clients present a success message when indeed the intent of the user failed. Typos are hard to catch.

...logon drive = domain logons = Yes os level = 22 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes wins proxy = No ldap suffix = dc=test,dc=com ldap machine suffix = ou=_COMPUTERS_ ldap user suffix = ou=_USERS_ ldap group suffix = ou=_GROUPS_ ldap admin dn = "cn=Manager,dc=test,dc=com" ldap ssl = No ldap passwd sync = yes comment = Samba-PDC Server public = No browseable = Yes writable = No client schannel = No...

...pache Linux-based web server use our existing NT domain to authenticate some of our web pages. We are using the Apache module mod_auth_pam to use pam-based authentication and then the winbind pam module to do the actual authentication. We have gotten to the point where we can authenticate using NT _users_, but we have not been able to authenticate using _groups_. For example, we can restrict a web page so that only the NT user "joeuser" can gain access to the page, but we have been unable to configure Apache so that any user of the NT group "SpecialAccess" (of which joeuser is a...

Summarization of the bug in Samba 3.0.2pre1: It seems that an ADS group is not valid or detected anymore to access a samba share, in case only an ADS group is used a valid user on a Samba share, because Kerberos is reporting: Username (null) is invalid on this system. Besides that, connecting to a share (service) reports with Samba 3.0.0-2 REALM\username (NH-TEST.NL\fo6), but with Samba 3.0.2pre1

...gt; > > wins proxy = No > > > > > > > > > > ldap suffix = dc=test,dc=com > > > > > > > > > > ldap machine suffix = ou=_COMPUTERS_ > > > > > > > > > > ldap user suffix = ou=_USERS_ > > > > > > > > > > ldap group suffix = ou=_GROUPS_ > > > > > > > > > > ldap admin dn = "cn=Manager,dc=test,dc=com" > > > > > > > > > > ldap ssl = No > > > > >...

On Sun, 7 May 2017 00:01:34 +0800 C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > > Having a place dedicated to mutual aid among front end developers > > (and of course assistance from anyone else who is willing to > > answer questions) would be nice. > > > > I referred you to that list in speaking from experience. cfe-dev > may have started life as a

Reid Spencer wrote: > LLVMers, > > The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better > version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure > what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions. I think before we begin discussing which software to use, we should discuss what is really wrong with CVS (on a day to

...obvious and basic to people who live and breathe LLVM. That's entirely understandable. However, there are many people out there, maybe even a lot more than are developing Clang in fact (though it is hard to know), who are developers using LLVM for other languages. Yes, I agree there are more _users_ of Clang than there are of Rust and Julia and Rubymotion and Crystal and Clasp and the dozens of others out there. After all, Clang is Apple's compiler, so there are huge numbers of users of Clang. However, in terms of people _developing_ other front ends, I get the impression there are a very...

Hi All. OpenSSH is getting ready for a release soon, so we are asking for all interested parties to test a snapshot. Changes include: * sshd will now re-exec itself for each new connection (the "-e" option is required when running sshd in debug mode). * PAM password authentication has been (re)added. * Interface improvements to sftp(1) * Many bug fixes and improvements, for

LLVMers, The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions. If you're interested in this topic (and you should be if you're actively developing), please have a look at this site: