search for: _order_

...sing R v2.7.1, platform i386-pc-mingw32 Can someone please shed some light on the behaviour of ifelse() for me? My intent is to calc relative proportions of z$b, at the same time subsetting z$b based on z$a. I could attack the problem other ways (suggestions welcome) but I am also intrigued by the _order_ in which ifelse seems to assign values, and how recycling works. For instance, z <- data.frame(a = c(1,2,3,4,1), b = 6:10) z$c <- ifelse(z$a > 1, z$b[z$a > 1]/sum(z$b[z$a > 1]), NA) z # seems to have filled z$c by row 4,2,3 a b c 1 1 6 NA 2 2 7 0.3333333 3 3 8...

...the computer powered off (as in completely shut down), power up and get into the BIOS setup screen. In the main screen, the first device, connected to the first, detected (P)ATA/IDE port, should be your USB device, as if it were to be identified as a regular HDD. This is different than the boot _order_ screen. If the main screen in your BIOS can list the USB device as the first device in the list, and it can also be set as the first device in the boot order settings, then the chances of booting successfully can increase. This procedure is independent of the potential 32KiB limitation for...

Hi, 1) I ran a script say test.R. It ran and terminated with an error. However, I am not sure where the error occur. > source("test.R") Loading required package: tools Welcome to Bioconductor Vignettes contain introductory material. To view, type 'openVignette()'. To cite Bioconductor, see 'citation("Biobase")' and for packages

On 03/18/2017 04:15 PM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> On 03/18/2017 01:18 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: >>> _ With the USB device connected to (one of) the problematic >>> computer(s), power up the system and get into the BIOS setup. In >>> the BIOS setup screen(s), change the boot order in such way that >>> the USB device is recognized as first

. and yes, one more thing. On some architectures it might be desirable to know the _order_ of instructions in the packet. That is a bit trickier.. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum. From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 2:40 PM To: LLVM Dev Subject:...

On Dec 2, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Sergei Larin wrote: > … and yes, one more thing. On some architectures it might be desirable to know the _order_ of instructions in the packet. That is a bit trickier…. Isn't that just the order of the instructions in the list? I don't see anything that prevents getting the order of instructions. It might require iterator over MIs in the packet. But for targets like VLIW, the # of instructions should...

Machine Instruction Bundle in LLVM Hi all, There have been quite a bit of discussions about adding machine instruction bundle to support VLIW targets. I have been pondering what the right representation should be and what kind of impact it might have on the LLVM code generator. I believe I have a fairly good plan now and would like to share with the LLVM community. Design Criteria 1. The