search for: _necessarily_

Would it be extremely difficult to do multicast over tinc? How about reliable multicast over tinc? This would be more traffic than multicast dns, but not _necessarily_ a great deal more. It would be for syncing some information among freeipa domain controllers. Would the tinc nodes need to be in all in switch or maybe even hub mode? EthernetOverIP over tinc?

...you can load up > a DAG post-ISel and then spit it back out scheduled. That would be much appreciated, particularly if it means that we can have scheduled MachineInstructions living alongside DAGs in such a way that changing the DAG (adding/removing a couple of instructions, say) doesn't _necessarily_ require rescheduling the whole function. I'm thinking of a future JIT here, where it would be nice to be able to sprinkle/reap instrumentation code over functions at high speed. Duraid

...would be > pretty much impossible :( Might a simple fix to make the error message at least slightly more helpful be to change it to something like: "Unable to find any firmware to satisfy '<whatever>' with specified settings" That would make it clearer that it isn't _necessarily_ the "efi" part (or whatever it happens to be in the specific case) which is the actual, _specific_ problem. -- Michael Kj?rling ??https://michael.kjorling.se ?Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog??

...AG post-ISel and then spit it back out scheduled. > > That would be much appreciated, particularly if it means that we can have > scheduled MachineInstructions living alongside DAGs in such a way that > changing the DAG (adding/removing a couple of instructions, say) doesn't > _necessarily_ require rescheduling the whole function. I'm thinking of a > future JIT here, where it would be nice to be able to sprinkle/reap > instrumentation code over functions at high speed. To me, I think the correct approach is to look at instruction selection in terms of dag rewriting, not...

On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 05:04 +0900, Duraid Madina wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM! Be warned, it's pretty > rough right now. Here are some of the known defects: > > - No varargs What are your issues here? Or are they simply at the "not implemented so I don't know" stage? Namely, I am working on some varargs

...t it back out scheduled. > > > > That would be much appreciated, particularly if it means that we can have > > scheduled MachineInstructions living alongside DAGs in such a way that > > changing the DAG (adding/removing a couple of instructions, say) doesn't > > _necessarily_ require rescheduling the whole function. I'm thinking of a > > future JIT here, where it would be nice to be able to sprinkle/reap > > instrumentation code over functions at high speed. > > To me, I think the correct approach is to look at instruction selection in > ter...

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 06:33:06AM +0100, Bhasker C V wrote: > I finally fixed it. > The issue seems to be with the tpm-tis/cpu backend (wonder why it shows up > with a different error) > For the sake of community, I am attaching the new xml file so that you can > do forensics on what changed > (I prettymuch did a virt-install --import --print-xml to redo the config > keeping

...over 10MB, and generally over 80MB) - 1.0.24 - small network: 1-4 MB - large network: 9-140 MB - 1.0.31 - small network: 1.5-4 MB - large network: 6-420 MB (median around 200MB) - 1.0.35 - large network: 15-450 MB (median around 200MB) So newer tincs tend to use more RAM, but not _necessarily_ that much more. Also, the small networks' usage never goes above 5MB. So I tried to break it up by distribution (only large network observed): - Ubuntu - 12.04: 3 MB - 14.04: 120-160 MB - Debian - 6: 3-140 MB - 7: 12-140 MB - 8: 9-110 MB - 9: 6-420 MB - 10: 15-450 MB I...

...cept queries which means it cans reply. > > Update case (Bind with no DLZ or Samba internal DNS) > - c1 use nsupdate to update our zone. nsupdate will look for a name server > of that zone which can modify the zone, as we want to modify the zone and > we know all name server are not _necessarily_ allowed to do that. So first > thing, who is SOA. NS1 reply SOA record refers to machine named SOA (yes I > know the reply is IP and not name, I just try to be understood), c1 send > update request to SOA rather than NS1. > - c2, same process except NS2 replies. > - c3 same again exc...

I'm starting a new thread on this because there are other failures I'd like to bring up, not _necessarily_ directly related to CentOS, but they all happen to me here. FTR: Linux mhrichter 2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 #1 SMP Thu May 7 10:35:59 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux (AMD 64x2 7750, 2.7GHz, 2GB memory, 900+GB disk, etc.) I had a meeting to go to last night, so before I left, I rebooted. When I r...

Hi everyone, I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM! Be warned, it's pretty rough right now. Here are some of the known defects: - No varargs - No alloca - No instruction scheduling/bundling of any sort ...or in other words, it breaks often and when it does work, it's a dog. On the plus side, it _does_ have a tasty new pattern instruction selector. :) Beyond fixing the

Hi all, I need to be able to delete a voicemail message using a program. Is is sufficient to simply delete the .wav and .txt files in the spool directory? Or do I need to also renumber the remaining files? For example, let say a given mailbox has 20 messages in it and I want to delete message number 5. Can I just delete the 2 files and expect that asterisk will renumber them? Or do I

2016-04-04 14:20 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone". >> > > No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and contains who to > contact for the domain records. > Rowland... thank you again Captain Obvious. Yes SOA means

...ans reply. > > > > Update case (Bind with no DLZ or Samba internal DNS) > > - c1 use nsupdate to update our zone. nsupdate will look for a name > server > > of that zone which can modify the zone, as we want to modify the zone and > > we know all name server are not _necessarily_ allowed to do that. So > first > > thing, who is SOA. NS1 reply SOA record refers to machine named SOA (yes > I > > know the reply is IP and not name, I just try to be understood), c1 send > > update request to SOA rather than NS1. > > - c2, same process except NS2 rep...