search for: _love_

...to do that analysis on the LLVM IR itself. :) > > Ah, OK. So you propose to do type inference in (all) front-ends? Or maybe on a higher IR? Again, wouldn't it be easier for dynamic language front-end implementations if type inference was just a pass on the LLVM IR? I would surely _love_ to have thins kind of feature :) Nicolas

...VMs can execute standard applications (last time I checked, the JVM can run tomcat), and the implementations follow the VM specifications. The CLI implementation lacks generics and overflow detection, but this is not top priority in my mind. Among many features, here are the ones that I'd _love_ to see implemented: 1) Compilation optimizations for type-safe languages (including type-based alias analysis) 2) Hotspot-like vm: switching between interpreter and compiler, applying different optimizations depending on a method's hotness, doing on-stack replacement 3) Implementing a garbag...

...ternal;1001 On another machine, the DB shows _nothing_, yet the AgentCallbackLogin application works correctly (logging agents in and out), and shows the correct mapping on the CLI during a login. Still, the DB has _no trace_ of the Agents. I can't explain the difference in behavior, and would _love_ to have someone solve that mystery for me. I'm hoping that I am missing something obvious in the interaction between the Queue command and the Agents channel, and that some kind soul here will educate me. Otherwise, I think I might be off to doing more work in "C" than I ever though...

I would like to see the code of your front end. I started working with llvm-java, since it was what was available. It does not run yet (small compilation issues, almost done), but the design seems fine. It can run (when setup complete) small pieces of Java code, but no real application, since it does not support exception handling (jsr/ret bytecodes) yet,nor garbage collection. Implementing these

...um.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-August/018388.html Is this: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-August/018414.html also related ? By the way, canreinvite=no as suggested by Mark in one of the slightly related conversations on bugs.digium.com does not help... I would really _love_ to know why this is and to see it fixed somehow. A bounty would be in order. Can anyone comment on this ?? On a related note: If the consultation ends in a failure (user unavailable or unable to talk) the way to back out is hitting flash once if the remote hung up (ata doesn't give any tone at...

...e never found it useful > to have an "as I type" preview. > Therefore it's not in Composer. again, it woulda been nice if you told us that sooner. > Again, plenty of other apps offer this > if that's what you want. they do? who? where? i would _love_ to see them. > If you use Marked for your preview, > which is the preferred method it's not _my_ "preferred method". > since Marked is much more detailed > of a preview app than Composer will ever be ok. if you say so. you know what your plans are....

...? > If so, wouldn't it be more efficient to use vfio, either by using SR-IOV or > by using virtio-mdev? > > Another guest? > If so, how would we route the I/O from one guest to the other? > Shared memory? Implementing a full-blown RDMA switch in qemu? > > Oh, and I would _love_ to have a discussion about this at KVM Forum. > Maybe I'll manage to whip up guest-to-guest RDMA connection using ivshmem > ... let's see. Following success in previous years to transfer ideas into code, we started to prepare RDMA miniconference in LPC 2019, which will be co-located...

Hi, Does Icecast has RTP support for streaming OGG/Vorbis and OGG/theora media files? If so, then please give me some pointers on how to configure my Icecast server to listen to RTP requests. If it's not available, then is the inclusion of this feature, in plans for future release of the product? Thanks -- Subhabrata Bhattacharya

...39;ll do another alpha release :) - smbd receives win-9x/smbclient requests, it now passes them on to DCE/RPC functions (e.g api_NetShareEnum calls srv_net_share_enum on loop-back. api_NetServerTOD calls srv_net_srv_tod. there _isn't_ a srv_net_server_enum, so i am a bit lost, there, i'd _love_ to know what microsoft is doing, there...) ok, have fun. luke <a href=" mailto:lkcl@samba.org" > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton </a> <a href=" http://cb1.com/~lkcl" > Samba and Network Development </a> <a href=" http://samba.org"...

Hi, I'd like to apologise to those who did not attend events in Boston at which I spoke, or was present for book signings, for not doing more to create greater awareness and for poor publicity on my part. (It was never my intent to act in secret.) :) In response to requests: 1) In future I will notify this list of events I will be present at. (That may encourage other Samba-Team members to

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: >> Yep. Sorry :(. > > "Sorry", like "this can really not be integrated in LLVM" or like "it is > possible but it requires a lot of work to integrate it"? :) it is not a desired feature for the LLVM type system itself. >> Depending on your application, you could read debug info, >> > >

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 07:02:15PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:01:54 +0300 > Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia at oracle.com> wrote: > > > Data center backends use more and more RDMA or RoCE devices and more and > > more software runs in virtualized environment. > > There is a need for a standard to enable RDMA/RoCE on Virtual Machines. > >

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 07:02:15PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:01:54 +0300 > Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia at oracle.com> wrote: > > > Data center backends use more and more RDMA or RoCE devices and more and > > more software runs in virtualized environment. > > There is a need for a standard to enable RDMA/RoCE on Virtual Machines. > >

Hi all, DIAX 0.9.4 is available for download from the same place: http://www.laser.com/dante or http://www.geocities.com/tdanro The new DLL contain the latest updates made by Steve in the iaxclient library. What's new in 0.9.4: - IAX2 support (new DLL); - selectable DSP: Echo cancellation, AGC, Denoise; - plaintext and md5 authentication supported; - the phonebook is now in a separate

Howdee, *** I know that the lmList() function exists, yet I don't want to use it. *** Would anyone be kind enough to tell how I can apply the function lm() to each level of a given factor so to obtain the intercept and slope for each factor level within a matrix? For instance, suppose a dataframe containing 3 variables: id, x and y. I want to compute the function lm() for each level

...? An existing piece of HW on the host? If so, wouldn't it be more efficient to use vfio, either by using SR-IOV or by using virtio-mdev? Another guest? If so, how would we route the I/O from one guest to the other? Shared memory? Implementing a full-blown RDMA switch in qemu? Oh, and I would _love_ to have a discussion about this at KVM Forum. Maybe I'll manage to whip up guest-to-guest RDMA connection using ivshmem ... let's see. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare at suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE L...

...t; applications (last time I checked, the JVM can run tomcat), and the > implementations follow the VM specifications. The CLI implementation > lacks generics and overflow detection, but this is not top priority in > my mind. > > Among many features, here are the ones that I'd _love_ to see implemented: > 1) Compilation optimizations for type-safe languages (including > type-based alias analysis) > 2) Hotspot-like vm: switching between interpreter and compiler, applying > different optimizations depending on a method's hotness, doing on-stack > replacement...

Chris Lattner wrote: > >> The issue I'm facing is object inheritance and how to find from a LLVM >> type what types it inherits. Currently this can't be implemented in LLVM >> and I need to implement a higher representation for types. >> > > Yep. Sorry :(. "Sorry", like "this can really not be integrated in LLVM" or like

Hi, my oi151 based home NAS is approaching a frightening "drive space" level. Right now the data volume is a 4*1TB Raid-Z1, 3 1/2" local disks individually connected to an 8 port LSI 6Gbit controller. So I can either exchange the disks one by one with autoexpand, use 2-4 TB disks and be happy. This was my original approach. However I am totally unclear about the 512b vs 4Kb issue.

Hi - I've got two copies of Dovecot installed on my server (don't worry, talking to two different sockets for authentication, with two different sets of filenames using options in configure), and I found at least one instance where the index file for my INBOX (on my own account, in fact) got corrupted. So badly so that when I connected via IMAP and selected my INBOX, it said there were no