search for: _get5

...s on linux again. Unfortunately it doesn't work at all (neither using runFunction nor a CallInst). It simply says function called get5 not known. Calling printf the same way works, though. On linux the function is exported as "get5" from the executable while it is called "_get5" on OS X. I could not spot any other differences.. any thoughts? greetings, Jan On 12. Jun 2007, at 23:08, Jan Rehders wrote: > Hi, > >> Okay. If the function exists in your application's address space >> already, >> just name the LLVM function the same name a...

Hi, > Okay. If the function exists in your application's address space > already, > just name the LLVM function the same name as the native function > and the > JIT should find it an do the right thing. This is how it finds > printf and > a variety of other things. You don't need to call addGlobalMapping at > all. Looking at the output of "nm

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Jan Rehders wrote: >> Jan, how are you doing this? Are you creating an external LLVM >> Function object named "get5", then using EE::addGlobalMapping? If >> 'get5' exists in the address space, why not just let the JIT resolve it >> (which will then create the stub)? > > Yes. I create a Function with matching signature,

...fortunately it doesn't work > at all (neither using runFunction nor a CallInst). It simply says > function called get5 not known. Calling printf the same way works, > though. On linux the function is exported as "get5" from the > executable while it is called "_get5" on OS X. I could not spot any > other differences.. any thoughts? > > greetings, > Jan > > On 12. Jun 2007, at 23:08, Jan Rehders wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> >>> Okay. If the function exists in your application's address space >...