search for: get5

...es an LLVM execution engine and adds modules and functions to it on the fly. I need to call some native functions of my program from bytecode functions which causes some troubles as it appears not to be documented. My test scenario works like the following: I have a simple function "int get5()" which I want to call from a bytecode function "int callget5()" which is generated at runtime. I register the native function "get5" using addGlobalMapping in the execution engine. I then try to call it using runFunction. This works under OS X, but fails in Linux...

...> modules and functions > to it on the fly. I need to call some native functions of my > program from bytecode functions which causes some troubles as it > appears not to be documented. My test scenario works like the > following: > > I have a simple function "int get5()" which I want to call from a > bytecode function "int callget5()" which is generated at runtime. I > register the native function "get5" using addGlobalMapping in the > execution engine. I then try to call it using runFunction. This > works under OS X,...

Hi, I was able to try this on linux again. Unfortunately it doesn't work at all (neither using runFunction nor a CallInst). It simply says function called get5 not known. Calling printf the same way works, though. On linux the function is exported as "get5" from the executable while it is called "_get5" on OS X. I could not spot any other differences.. any thoughts? greetings, Jan On 12. Jun 2007, at 23:08, Jan Rehders wrote:...

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Jan Rehders wrote: >> Jan, how are you doing this? Are you creating an external LLVM >> Function object named "get5", then using EE::addGlobalMapping? If >> 'get5' exists in the address space, why not just let the JIT resolve it >> (which will then create the stub)? > > Yes. I create a Function with matching signature, calling conventions > and external linkage which I pass t...

...ough, so I can't really say for sure what goes > wrong here. The LLVM PPC JIT certainly does produce these stubs. The PPCJITInfo::emitFunctionStub method is the one that actually creates them :) Jan, how are you doing this? Are you creating an external LLVM Function object named "get5", then using EE::addGlobalMapping? If 'get5' exists in the address space, why not just let the JIT resolve it (which will then create the stub)? -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Dear List Members, I need some help about programming in S language. My problem is as follows: I have meteorological data (about rainfall measurement each day from 1989-2002), say like http://www.angelfire.com/ab5/get5/data.rainfall.txt or http://www.angelfire.com/ab5/get5/R.rainfall.txt in a sequence of 0(denoting dry day)'s and 1(denoting wet day)'s. I want to construct a frequency distribution table of various lengths (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,or more) of observed wet spells (number of successive 1's) an...

...t I did. And don't forget to use the C++ name if you compile with C++. Cheers, Nicolas Jan Rehders wrote: > Hi, > > I was able to try this on linux again. Unfortunately it doesn't work > at all (neither using runFunction nor a CallInst). It simply says > function called get5 not known. Calling printf the same way works, > though. On linux the function is exported as "get5" from the > executable while it is called "_get5" on OS X. I could not spot any > other differences.. any thoughts? > > greetings, > Jan > > On 12. Ju...

...he same name as the native function > and the > JIT should find it an do the right thing. This is how it finds > printf and > a variety of other things. You don't need to call addGlobalMapping at > all. Looking at the output of "nm codegen1" I realized that "get5" was a C+ + function whose name was mangled to "__Z4get5v". Surrounding it by extern "C" helped a lot :) Now the function is found by the JIT and I can call it using EE->runFunction als well as using a CallInst. > Does this work? However, one strange effet rema...

Hi, > Jan, how are you doing this? Are you creating an external LLVM > Function > object named "get5", then using EE::addGlobalMapping? If 'get5' > exists in > the address space, why not just let the JIT resolve it (which will > then > create the stub)? Yes. I create a Function with matching signature, calling conventions and external linkage which I pass together...

Hi, attached is a small testcase I did. It builds two LLVM functions which both call two native functions get5 and get6. The native functions are in the exe and in the dll. On OS X it works like a charm. On Linux none of the two functions can be called. Maybe someone can try them or have a look at it to see if there is something obviously wrong greetings, Jan -------------- next part -------------...

...ic "Self-starting non-linear regressions" using negexp.SSival - but i can not solve my hypothetical problem using that - my problem is : Y = EXP(-(THETA * t)) with data below for estimating THETA: t Y 1 0.80 4 0.45 16 0.04 Whatever i could do, is in http://www.angelfire.com/ab5/get5/nonlinear.PDF Any response / help / comment / suggestion / idea / web-link / replies will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time. _______________________ Mohammad Ehsanul Karim <wildscop at yahoo.com> Institute of Statistical Research and Training University of Dhaka, Dh...

On 11 Jun 2007, at 22:35, Jan Rehders wrote: > It's inside PPCJITInfo::relocate but unfortunately I could not figure > out anything from the source. It looks like it's calculating new > addresses for functions which does not make much sense for a native > function, at all On the PPC, unconditional branches are limited to 24 bit signed displacements. When you call a function

Hi, > I know nothing about this, but the failed assertion suggests the PPC > code generator can't cope with a constant that's bigger than > expected at > that point. Have you taken a look at PPCJITInfo.cpp:382? It may shed > some light. It's inside PPCJITInfo::relocate but unfortunately I could not figure out anything from the source. It looks like it's

...e()); This will force an indirect call, and won't use the jump-size limitation of the bl instruction. Let me know if this helps. Cheers, Nicolas Jan Rehders wrote: > Hi, > > attached is a small testcase I did. It builds two LLVM functions which > both call two native functions get5 and get6. The native functions are > in the exe and in the dll. On OS X it works like a charm. On Linux > none of the two functions can be called. > > Maybe someone can try them or have a look at it to see if there is > something obviously wrong > > greetings, > Jan >...

...values are not good enough: How can i make a grid search? 2. How can i estimate C.E.S Production Function [ Y = GAMA * ((DELTA*K^(-BETA)) + ((1-DELTA)*L^(-BETA)))^(-PHI/BETA) ] using the same data? How to get the initial value? N.B.: The data file is available at http://www.angelfire.com/ab5/get5/klein.txt Any response / help / comment / suggestion / idea / web-link / replies will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time. _______________________ Mohammad Ehsanul Karim <wildscop at yahoo.com> Institute of Statistical Research and Training University of Dhaka, Dhaka-...

...d assertion `ResultPtr >= -(1 << 23) && ResultPtr < (1 << 23) && "Relocation out of range!"' > I am wondering if there is some name mangling issue? Not that I'm aware of. It appears to find the function using module- >getFunction("get5") Is there really nobody here who knows how to properly register native functions of the application to the execution engine?

Dear List Members, I need a bit help about fitting some theoretical distributions (such as geometric, exponential, lognormal or weibull distribution) to the following *dry spell*, *wet spell*, *cycles (Wet-Dry or Dry-Wet)* from my meteorological (daily rainfall) data http://www.angelfire.com/ab5/get5/R.rainfall.txt only for rainy seasen (july - september) of 14 years only: dryspell<-c(1,1,4,1,1,4,2,2,3,4,1,2,1,1,1,3,1,3, 2,3,1,2,3,3,2,2,6,2,1,1,3,1,2,1,4,4,1,1,2,1,1,2, 2,4,1,1,1,3,4,1,7,1,3,2,5,1,3,1,1,3,4,8,4,3,1,1, 1,2,3,1,1,2,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,13,13,7,1,1,1,1,7,3,2, 1,3,1,1,2,5,1,2,1,3,1,1,2...

...ize > limitation > of the bl instruction. > > Let me know if this helps. > > Cheers, > Nicolas > > Jan Rehders wrote: >> Hi, >> >> attached is a small testcase I did. It builds two LLVM functions >> which >> both call two native functions get5 and get6. The native functions >> are >> in the exe and in the dll. On OS X it works like a charm. On Linux >> none of the two functions can be called. >> >> Maybe someone can try them or have a look at it to see if there is >> something obviously wrong >&gt...

...[19]*DRY[11]+WET[20]*DRY[10]+WET[21]*DRY[9]+WET[22]*DRY[8]+WET[23]*DRY[7]+WET[24]*DRY[6]+WET[25]*DRY[5]+WET[26]*DRY[4]+WET[27]*DRY[3]+WET[28]*DRY[2]+WET[29]*DRY[1] ) Thank you for your time. PS: if the above formula can not be seen correctly, one can see details at http://www.angelfire.com/ab5/get5/alt.ren.txt ---------------------------------- Mohammad Ehsanul Karim Web: http://snipurl.com/ehsan ISRT, University of Dhaka, BD