search for: _find_

I think you're missing a point here. Two different checksum algorithms are used in concert, the Adler-based one and the MD5 one. I SSE-optimized the Adler-based one. The Adler-based hash is used to _find_ blocks that might have shifted, while the MD5 hash is a strong cryptographic hash used to _verify_ blocks and files. You wouldn't want to replace the MD5 hash with the Adler-based hash, they are of a different class. If you'd replace the MD5 hash with a different one, you'd replace it w...

...ay be left dangling by other programs written with the same version of compiled BASIC SeeAlso: INT 3C,INT 3E That is probably about all we know about interrupt 3d. Want to take a swat at implementing it? Why does the stupid program think it needs to emulate floating point? I challenge you to _find_ a x86 machine without floating point hardware. Maybe you could find what registry entry it is looking for before to tell it there is really floating point hardware and it doesn't need to do this? --debugmsg +reg,+advapi(?) _might_ spew out something helpful. Or maybe you can disassemble your...

Hello, I'm quite new with R and so I would like to know if there is a command to calculate an integral. In particular I simulated a bivariate normal distribution using these simple lines: rbivnorm <- function(n, # sample size mux, # expected value of x muy, # expected value of Y sigmax, # standard deviation of

Well, don't get too excited, get_checksum1() (the function optimized here) is not the great performance limiter in this case, it's get_checksum2() and sum_update(), which will be using MD5. You can force using MD4, but on the slower CPU's I've tested in practice that is slower rather than faster, contrary to what would be expected. While this patch will improve things a little, to

I'm trying to set up cross-subnet browsing using Samba on a Linux box and a Sparc UltraEnterprise with Win95 and NT Workstation clients. I'm using the Sparc as the domain master and also as the WINS server on the 108 subnet. The Linux box is the local master on the 46 subnet. Both are running Samba 1.9.17alpha4. I can see the conversation between the two samba servers and the browse

Should I file an RFE for this addition to ZFS? The concept would be to run ZFS on a file server, exporting storage to an application server where ZFS also runs on top of that storage. All storage management would take place on the file server, where the physical disks reside. The application server would still perform end-to-end error checking but would notify the file server when it detected