search for: _do

...against using the DC as a file server, but there are others. People have complained about the hard drive filling up until the DC is restarted, there have also been problems with excessive use of memory. I will put it this way, which part of the following statement do you not understand ? *We _do not recommend_ using the Domain Controller as a file Server*. As taken from the DC page on the samba wiki. I have no worries about using windbind, it works for me because I use it as recommended, it would seem that you are the one with the worries. Rowland

...new files will have 664 permissions and new dirs 775 permissions. If I access to the smb shares over my file explorer and create files an dirs, they get the permissions on the server I set in the smb.conf. So it works! Now the problem: If I mount the share and create there files and dirs, they _DO NOT_ get the permissions on the server they should have (The perimssions I set in the smb.conf) My mount command: mount -t cifs -o username=user,password=pass,iocharset=utf8 //home-server/share /share (mount -t smbfs doesn't work) I hope you're able to understand my (probably) english ;...

..., it is automatically joined to the domain. > I did this once and it was not me well and I had to restore the backup. > > The samba documentation does not say anything of this. > Remember this isnt a member server this is the PDC, on samba ACDC doc > say this: > > "We /*_do not recommend_* using the Domain Controller as a file > Server. This is due to issues with the winbind internal to the Domain > Controller./" > > But I also need to use it because I had no other server to use as a > file server. It is not recommended, but you can do it, ther...

...y this domain controller >> is serving files but I want to move that function to a dedicated box. > For months, there has been no explanation about the reason, just /don't do this/. And queries for a rationale behind this were rarely answered. Now there is only this sentence : We/*_do not recommend_*using the Domain Controller as a file Server. This is due to issues with the winbind internal to the Domain Controller. The recommendation is to run separate file orMember Servers <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_AD_Member_Server>./ OK, so in fact the only r...

.... People have complained about the hard drive filling >> up until the DC is restarted, there have also been problems with >> excessive use of memory. >> >> I will put it this way, which part of the following statement do you >> not understand ? >> >> *We _do not recommend_ using the Domain Controller as a file Server*. >> > > We run scripts which require accurate nss information. So, no worries. > On our machines, sssd works fine. winbind doesn't. > > Rowland, wasn't it you who asked the developers how much work it would...

...e and it was not me well and I had to restore the > backup. > > > > > > The samba documentation does not say anything of this. > > > Remember this isnt a member server this is the PDC, on samba ACDC doc > > > say this: > > > > > > "We /*_do not recommend_* using the Domain Controller as a file > > > Server. This is due to issues with the winbind internal to the Domain > > > Controller./" > > > > > > But I also need to use it because I had no other server to use as a > > > file server....

...eady used in this very same way at lguest64. It's the first part of our plan to have lguest and lguest64 unified too. When two dogs hang out, you don't have new puppies right in the other day. Some time has to be elapsed. They have to grow first. In this same spirit, having these patches _do not_ mean smp guests can be launched (yet) Much more work is to come, but this is the basic infrastructure. Enjoy

...eady used in this very same way at lguest64. It's the first part of our plan to have lguest and lguest64 unified too. When two dogs hang out, you don't have new puppies right in the other day. Some time has to be elapsed. They have to grow first. In this same spirit, having these patches _do not_ mean smp guests can be launched (yet) Much more work is to come, but this is the basic infrastructure. Enjoy

...gt;> filling up until the DC is restarted, there have also been problems >>>> with excessive use of memory. >>>> >>>> I will put it this way, which part of the following statement do >>>> you not understand ? >>>> >>>> *We _do not recommend_ using the Domain Controller as a file Server*. >>>> >>> >>> We run scripts which require accurate nss information. So, no >>> worries. On our machines, sssd works fine. winbind doesn't. >>> >>> Rowland, wasn't it you w...

...t; > > > > > > > > > The samba documentation does not say anything of this. > > > > > Remember this isnt a member server this is the PDC, on samba > ACDC doc > > > > > say this: > > > > > > > > > > "We /*_do not recommend_* using the Domain Controller as a file > > > > > Server. This is due to issues with the winbind internal to the > Domain > > > > > Controller./" > > > > > > > > > > But I also need to use it because I had no other s...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I''ve a problem on the broadcast it is adding some additional route to the router which caused me some problem... Below is my /etc/shorewall/interface swtmng1 eth0.1 202.73.10.127 norfc1918 apmng1 eth0.10 202.73.8.7 norfc1918 dist1 eth0.1000 202.73.11.255 norfc1918,nobogons idc1 eth2.50

...files but I want to move that function to a >>> dedicated box. >> > > For months, there has been no explanation about the reason, just > /don't do this/. And queries for a rationale behind this were rarely > answered. Now there is only this sentence : > > We/*_do not recommend_*using the Domain Controller as a file Server. > This is due to issues with the winbind internal to the Domain > Controller. The recommendation is to run separate file orMember > Servers > <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_AD_Member_Server>./ > &...

...ain. > > > I did this once and it was not me well and I had to restore the backup. > > > > The samba documentation does not say anything of this. > > Remember this isnt a member server this is the PDC, on samba ACDC doc > > say this: > > > > "We /*_do not recommend_* using the Domain Controller as a file > > Server. This is due to issues with the winbind internal to the Domain > > Controller./" > > > > But I also need to use it because I had no other server to use as a > > file server. > > It is not r...

..., but > there are others. People have complained about the hard drive filling > up until the DC is restarted, there have also been problems with > excessive use of memory. > > I will put it this way, which part of the following statement do you > not understand ? > > *We _do not recommend_ using the Domain Controller as a file Server*. > We run scripts which require accurate nss information. So, no worries. On our machines, sssd works fine. winbind doesn't. Rowland, wasn't it you who asked the developers how much work it would cost them to (to use your t...

...ssive > use of memory. That's clearly indicate bugs breeding and multiplying in the application. Instead of telling people "oh, just don't do it", why not fix the bugs? > I will put it this way, which part of the following statement do you not > understand ? > *We _do not recommend_ using the Domain Controller as a file Server*. So, you are recommending to not use domain controller at all, I got it right? Because a system that does nothing at all, just sitting there and grinning, is an useless junk and should be discarded as soon as possible. > As taken fro...

...mining the right mix of global settings to get this to work. I have read through many tutorials online, but so far I have not found good documentation on how to achieve this. What I am really attempting to do is unify the credentials for access to the server though ftp, apache, and samba. I _do not_ want to link the linux shell credentials to this for various reasons including security. Any helpful suggestions would be appreciated. =>Charles

...s. Judging from earlier discussions with Vikram, it should be realtively easy to support these in LLC as long as he has time to implement it (in fact, it might involve removing hacks that are in place to support the old broken behavior). Until he gets to it though, LLC probably won't work, so _do not_ update your tree if you need LLC. In other, unfortunate, news, it looks like one of my recent changes [to make it output code that doesn't do bad operations on pointers] broke the GCC frontend fairly severely. The testcases I used to make sure it was ok apparently didn't hit the prob...

What's really the problem with: > regexpr( '\.odt$', "xxxxYodt", perl=TRUE ) Warning: '\.' is an unrecognized escape in a character string Warning: unrecognized escape removed from "\.odt$" [1] 5 attr(,"match.length") [1] 4 I know that I could use: > regexpr( '[.]odt$', "xxxxYodt", perl=TRUE ) But it seems to me that

...ut the hard drive >>> filling up until the DC is restarted, there have also been problems >>> with excessive use of memory. >>> >>> I will put it this way, which part of the following statement do you >>> not understand ? >>> >>> *We _do not recommend_ using the Domain Controller as a file Server*. >>> >> >> We run scripts which require accurate nss information. So, no >> worries. On our machines, sssd works fine. winbind doesn't. >> >> Rowland, wasn't it you who asked the developers...

Samba 1.9.17p2 running on SPARC 4 Solaris 2.5. Windows 95 clients. For some time now I have been hearing reports of users not being able to logon to the domain--but I've never seen it happen myself, and I never do anything to fix it. It's just this annoying problem that doesn't happen often enough for me to ever see or track down. Today, FINALLY, I tried logging into a machine and