Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "_dists".
Did you mean:
dists
2015 Apr 14
3
The complicated filter rule used by me worked for one Debian mirror and not for the other.
Hi all,
I write a complex filter rules as follows:
rsync -amvHPRSB131072 -n --delete --delete-excluded \
-f +_dists/jessie/**binary-all/Packages.gz \
-f +_dists/jessie/Release* \
-f +_dists/jessie/**binary-amd64/Packages.gz \
-f +_dists/jessie/**installer-amd64/*** \
-f +_dists/jessie/**binary-i386/Packages.gz \
-f +_dists/jessie/**installer-i386/*** \
-f +_dists/***/ \
-f -_* ftp.cn.debian.org::debian/
When I...
2015 Apr 18
2
Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
...cal copy, so there is not need to be rsynced.
But when I use a complex rsync filter rules script based on checksum and
others to check all of the stuff based on the corresponding rules, it
shows that the above package need to be updated, see the following for
detail:
1- My script is named as su_dists.rsync and the content of it is as
follows, sorry for its complex ;-(
___________ begin su_dists.rsync ____________
rsync -amvHKLPRSB131072 -nc --delete --delete-excluded \
-f +_dists/wheezy/**Translation-en* \
-f +_dists/wheezy/**binary-all/Packages.gz \
-f +_dists/wheezy/Release* \
-f P_dists/...
2015 Apr 18
0
Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
...> rsynced.
>
> But when I use a complex rsync filter rules script based on
> checksum and others to check all of the stuff based on the
> corresponding rules, it shows that the above package need to be
> updated, see the following for detail:
>
> 1- My script is named as su_dists.rsync and the content of it is as
> follows, sorry for its complex ;-(
>
> ___________ begin su_dists.rsync ____________
>
> rsync -amvHKLPRSB131072 -nc --delete --delete-excluded \ -f
> +_dists/wheezy/**Translation-en* \ -f
> +_dists/wheezy/**binary-all/Packages.gz \ -f
>...
2015 Apr 14
1
The complicated filter rule used by me worked for one Debian mirror and not for the other.
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:32:46 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> ftp.cn.debian.org is running a version of rsync that supports protocol
> version 30, whereas ftp.is.co.za is running an older version that only
> supports up to 29.
Anyway, thanks for your above notes again. I finally use the nmap to
check the things you said above are correct:
werner at debian:~$ nmap -sV -p873