search for: _crt_nonstdc_no_warnings

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "_crt_nonstdc_no_warnings".

2007 Nov 07
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 with VC++
...is declared with a PSTR ModuleName argument. This causes a compile error - the callback typedef specifies PCSTR. Also, I'd like to suggest adding the following to config.h, to eliminate the spurious deprecation warnings: #define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS #define _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS #define _CRT_NONSTDC_NO_WARNINGS And moving #include "llvm/Config/config.h" in all the files above any other includes, so those will have the proper effect. Finally, is the JIT considered stable under Windows? -- Cory Nelson
2007 Nov 07
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 with VC++
> Also, I'd like to suggest adding the following to config.h, to > eliminate the spurious deprecation warnings: > > #define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS > #define _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS > #define _CRT_NONSTDC_NO_WARNINGS > > > And moving #include "llvm/Config/config.h" in all the files above any > > other includes, so those will have the proper effect. Can we guard those defines like so? #if defined _MSC_VER && _MSC_VER >= 1300 #if !defined _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS...
2008 May 21
3
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing
Razvan Aciu wrote: > As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into > account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in > the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for > the release. If I am wrong, please someone correct me. > > If someone can make a 2005 patch for the release branch, it is ok.
2007 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 with VC++
...You might want to try LLVM SVN. I believe Hartmut has made several improvements. > Also, I'd like to suggest adding the following to config.h, to > eliminate the spurious deprecation warnings: > > #define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS > #define _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS > #define _CRT_NONSTDC_NO_WARNINGS > > And moving #include "llvm/Config/config.h" in all the files above any > other includes, so those will have the proper effect. If LLVM SVN doesn't have these improvements, please consider sending in a patch, thanks! > Finally, is the JIT considered stable under Windo...
2015 Sep 03
4
LLVM 3.7.0 build errors on Windows
...reported in LLVM header files, mostly llvm/Support/COFF.h and llvm/Object/COFF.h I'm using Visual Studio Community 2015, the CXX compiler identification is MSVC 19.0.23026.0 My CPP includes are: WIN32 _WINDOWS NDEBUG _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS _CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE _CRT_NONSTDC_NO_WARNINGS _SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS _GNU_SOURCE %(PreprocessorDefinitions) Now, a couple of things are suspicious: - in googling around it seems like there are some problems with including Windows.h (which I have to inc...
2008 Feb 18
3
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
>There's a config.h file in the win32 subdirectory that implies that it's >supposed to be concatenated as part of the build process, but it doesn't >seem like that's happening from within the .sln script--am I missing a >pre-build step someplace? When config.h.in is hit in the build of configure the configure project, the configure.h file from the win32 directory is