Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "_codec_".
Did you mean:
codec_
2001 Aug 23
0
[Re: RC2 vs. beta4 (test)]
/> Additionally, it has been stated many times that you /
/> _should_ _never_ _transcode_ _any_ _lossy_ _codec_. /
This isn't transcoding. The point about transcoding, say, MP3->OGG
is that the two codecs use different assumptions (psychoacoustic models,
etc.) in performing the compression -- so transcoding often results in
one codec trying to chase down and reproduce artifacts generated by the
other...
2001 Aug 23
3
RC2 vs. beta4 (test)
Hi!
I would like to share with you an interesting test result.
I re-encoded a song 10 times (the 2. made from the 1.,
the 3. made from the 2.,... the 10. made from the 9.),
with a beta4 (CVS 20010620)
and with an RC2 (CVS 20010817) library version,
256 kbit/s mode, channel coupling disabled at RC2.
The beta4 is very good at the 10. encoding too,
but the RC2 has some interesting quality bugs.
So,
2003 Aug 08
2
G.729 licensing -- an opinion
...rst glance:
a) accesses files on my hard drive,
b) accesses my SCSI devices,
c) accesses my IDE devices,
d) possibly accesses other devices via ioctl() calls,
e) contains encryption code,
f) possibly transmits sensitive information outside of my
network.
I have purchased a _codec_, which means encoding and decoding
software. I did not expect any other functionality. I do not have the
habit of running this sort of unknown "black-box" code on my machines.
I'm not even mentioning the fact that the whole licensing is rather
limited -- you can't move the licens...