search for: _client

...3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/client.h b/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/client.h index eaf5905a87a3..99083349c3d4 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/client.h +++ b/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/client.h @@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ int nvkm_client_notify_put(struct nvkm_client *, int index); /* logging for client-facing objects */ #define nvif_printk(o,l,p,f,a...) do { \ - struct nvkm_object *_object = (o); \ - struct nvkm_client *_client = _object->client;...

...3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/client.h b/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/client.h index eaf5905a87a3..99083349c3d4 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/client.h +++ b/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/client.h @@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ int nvkm_client_notify_put(struct nvkm_client *, int index); /* logging for client-facing objects */ #define nvif_printk(o,l,p,f,a...) do { \ - struct nvkm_object *_object = (o); \ - struct nvkm_client *_client = _object->client;...

I''ve been analyzing our Unicorn-powered Rails app''s performance, and have found that garbage collection is a big factor in slow requests. In the interest of avoiding those performance hits while handling requests, would it be possible to have a unicorn worker run garbage collection after handling a request and before waiting for the next one? Would this be a good idea? Cheers,

On 19.07.2017 09:39, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 19.07.2017 09:36, Thomas Leuxner wrote: >> * Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> 2017.07.19 08:31: >> >>> oh and any idea which one of these crashes? >> This one does: >> >> # cat Flagged/dovecot-virtual >> * >> :public/* >> -Trash >> -Trash/* >> flagged > Thanks,

...26 19:27:13 2003 +++ dovecot-0.99.10.5-patched/src/login-common/auth-connection.c Mon Jun 14 13:21:22 2004 @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ struct auth_connection *conn; struct auth_request *request; struct auth_login_request_new auth_request; +#ifdef PASSDB_VPOPMAIL + struct client *_client = context; +#endif if (auth_reconnect) auth_connect_missing(); @@ -325,6 +328,9 @@ auth_request.protocol = protocol; auth_request.mech = request->mech; auth_request.id = request->id; +#ifdef PASSDB_VPOPMAIL + auth_request.client_ip = _client->ip; +#endif...

...0 file = 0x0 io = 0x91e89a45d153b800 iop = <optimized out> temp_ios = {arr = {buffer = 0x5634566690e8, element_size = 8}, v = 0x5634566690e8, v_modifiable = 0x5634566690e8} ret = <optimized out> failed = false #2 0x0000563456150418 in imap_client_hibernate (_client=_client at entry=0x7ffea4ebd0d0) at imap-client-hibernate.c:221 client = 0x56345668be48 state = 0x563456a4bf20 error = 0x7f30bbfcbb02 <i_set_failure_prefix+194> "H\211\005\027\353(" ret = 1 fd_notify = -1 fd_hibernat...

...borted Now I'm lost... Am I in the right direction? Thanks, Gedalya # dovecot -n # 2.1.17: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686 Debian 7.1 auth_default_realm = example.com auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5 auth_verbose = yes auth_verbose_passwords = plain default_client_limit = 8096 dict { expire = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext quota = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext } disable_plaintext_auth = no imapc_host = mail01.example.com mail_gid = vmail mail_plugins = listescape mail_prefetch_count = 50 mail_uid = vmail namespace { hidd...

...ut>, keep_retriable=<optimized out>) at imapc-connection.c:271 #4 0x000002d0fbf624be in imapc_connection_disconnect (conn=0x2b46579c10) at imapc-connection.c:371 #5 0x000002d0fbf636b9 in imapc_connection_deinit (_conn=0x2b46579b20) at imapc-connection.c:178 #6 0x000002d0fbf60113 in imapc_client_deinit (_client=0x2b4655b6e8) at imapc-client.c:111 #7 0x000002d0fbf5ea77 in imapc_storage_destroy (_storage=<optimized out>) at imapc-storage.c:275 #8 0x000002d0fbf90600 in mail_storage_unref (_storage=0x2b46558910) at mail-storage.c:417 #9 0x000002d0fbf8a259 in mail_namespace_free (ns=0x...

Hi, Is FAXing with Asterisk a practical option ? Or is it better just to use a plain fax connected to an FXS and just switch with Asterisk. I specifically wanted to know if there was any experience using just the fax scanner to send faxes and receive them via asterisk and the to e-mail. My idea was to take my old fax connect it to an FXS port and send faxes with the fax machine (using the fax

...", i''ve got the following compile error: gcc -m32 -march=i686 -Wall -W -g -Wp,-MD,.xenstore_read.o.d -I../../tools/libx c -I../../xen/include/public -I../../xen/include/public -I../../linux-2.6-xen-sp arse/include/asm-xen/linux-public -c -DCLIENT_read -o xenstore_read.o xenstore _client.c xenstore_client.c:16:16: xs.h: No such file or directory xenstore_client.c: In function `main'': xenstore_client.c:34: error: `bool'' undeclared (first use in this function) xenstore_client.c:34: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once xenstore_client.c:34: error:...

..._auth_failed (client=0x6af000, nodelay=true) at client-authenticate.c:103 > #7 0x0000000000405e07 in client_handle_args (client=0x6af000, args=<value optimized out>, success=true, nodelay_r=0x7fff571009af) > at client-authenticate.c:198 > #8 0x0000000000406214 in sasl_callback (_client=0x6af000, reply=SASL_SERVER_REPLY_SUCCESS, data=0x0, args=0x6361d0) at client-authenticate.c:277 > #9 0x000000000040eb13 in auth_client_input_ok (conn=0x75b6c8, args=<value optimized out>) at auth-server-request.c:196 > #10 0x000000000040dbf3 in auth_client_input (conn=0x75b6c8) at aut...

...fault. #0 0x00000000004081fe in lmtp_proxy_try_finish (proxy=0x633898) at lmtp-proxy.c:193 193 if (lmtp_proxy_send_data_replies(proxy) && (gdb) bt full #0 0x00000000004081fe in lmtp_proxy_try_finish (proxy=0x633898) at lmtp-proxy.c:193 No locals. #1 0x0000000000409bb3 in lmtp_client_deinit (_client=<value optimized out>) at lmtp-client.c:137 client = (struct lmtp_client *) 0x633db8 #2 0x00000000004089c8 in lmtp_proxy_deinit (_proxy=<value optimized out>) at lmtp-proxy.c:86 proxy = (struct lmtp_proxy *) 0x633898 #3 0x000000000040602e in client_dest...

This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon

...f8120a in openssl_iostream_more (ssl_io=0x7f6980852320, type=<value optimized out>) at iostream-openssl.c:526 ret = <value optimized out> #5 0x00007f697af81247 in openssl_iostream_destroy (ssl_io=0x7f6980852320) at iostream-openssl.c:354 No locals. #6 0x00007f697d8cc862 in client_unref (_client=<value optimized out>) at client-common.c:365 client = 0x7f6982b5a840 __func__ = "client_unref" #7 0x00007f697d8d0adc in login_proxy_free_full (_proxy=<value optimized out>, reason=0x7f697f6ae0a0 "Disconnected by server(0s idle, in=307, out=1038)", delayed=<value...

...8120a in openssl_iostream_more (ssl_io=0x7f6980852320, type=<value optimized out>) at iostream-openssl.c:526 ret = <value optimized out> #5 0x00007f697af81247 in openssl_iostream_destroy (ssl_io=0x7f6980852320) at iostream-openssl.c:354 No locals. #6 0x00007f697d8cc862 in client_unref (_client=<value optimized out>) at client-common.c:365 client = 0x7f6982b5a840 __func__ = "client_unref" #7 0x00007f697d8d0adc in login_proxy_free_full (_proxy=<value optimized out>, reason=0x7f697f6ae0a0 "Disconnected by server(0s idle, in=307, out=1038)", delayed=<valu...

This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon

Hi everyone, Apologies for the big patchset. This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send

This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the

This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the

Hi all, this is the long awaited patch series to add xen device model support in qemu; the main author is Anthony Perard. Developing this series we tried to come up with the cleanest possible solution from the qemu point of view, limiting the amount of changes to common code as much as possible. The end result still requires a couple of hooks in piix_pci but overall the impact should be very