search for: _anywhere_

Correct me if I'm wrong, but init_rng() in entropy.c doesn't call seed_rng(), and in fact seed_rng() isn't called from _anywhere_ (in openssh-2.5.1p2). So calls to BN_rand() only pick up the tiny/non-existent amount of entropy added by BN_rand() itself from the system clock (time in seconds). Shouldn't seed_rng() be called from init_rng()? It should be called from _somewhere_, or deleted. Thanks, Dr. Tom Holroyd &quo...

...ipts]# netstat -tulnp | grep 389 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:389 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3774/slapd [root at ldap network-scripts]# netstat -tulnp | grep slapd tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:389 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3774/slapd I haven't specified port 3774 _anywhere_ in my ldap config: [root at ldap network-scripts]# grep 3774 /etc/ldap thanks in advance for your help -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!!

...: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > >>Where is it released? Telling me I have to set up cvs to download > > > http://www.xiph.org/~msmith/ > > This has been said before. This is no good. This is by far not the first time someone has pointed out, that icecast2 is not mentioned _anywhere_ where one would expect to find it. By this I mean locations like icecast.org, freshmeat.net, etc. I wonder how people start to hear about icecast2. But when they do, the _only_ way to find the actual software is to come to this list and ask. Is this any good? Is there a reason for such secrecy?...

Akos Maroy wrote: > > http://www.xiph.org/~msmith/ > > This has been said before. > This is no good. This is by far not the first time someone has pointed > out, that icecast2 is not mentioned _anywhere_ where one would expect to > find it. By this I mean locations like icecast.org, freshmeat.net, etc. > I wonder how people start to hear about icecast2. But when they do, the > _only_ way to find the actual software is to come to this list and ask. Well, the way I see it, icecast.org is so...

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > If icecast.org is so broken, then someone ought to do what was > > suggested on the list in November (looking through the archives): > > put it out of its misery. Why are there no "official" releases? > > I already told you, there *are* official releases (or, to be exact, one > release), but

I have a work around for this, but can someone explain why the first example does not work properly? I believed it worked in the previous version of R, by selecting just the rows=200525 and omitting the na's. I just upgraded to 2.13. I am also concern with the row numbers being different in the selections, should I be worried? FYI, I just selected the first few rows for demonstration, please