Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "__order_".
Did you mean:
_order_
2014 Feb 26
3
[LLVMdev] test-suite wrongly using big-endian results
...robert at xmos.com> wrote:
> This is related to a patch I submitted a little while ago (still pending):
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2760
>
> If accepted, would it make this patch (and a others) unnecessary?
Hi Robert,
It is, but hijacking your patch a little, why not use
__ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__? Why do we need to create __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ ?
cheers,
--renato