Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "__ops".
Did you mean:
__op
2016 Nov 20
3
uninitialized values in Attributes.cpp
...cpp:186)
==29299== by 0x13FCF12: operator() (Attributes.cpp:627)
==29299== by 0x13FCF12: operator()<const std::pair<unsigned int,
llvm::Attribute> *> (predefined_ops.h:234)
==29299== by 0x13FCF12: __find_if<const std::pair<unsigned int,
llvm::Attribute> *, __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<(lambda at
../lib/IR/Attributes.cpp:627:3)> > (stl_algo.h:140)
==29299== by 0x13FCF12: __find_if<const std::pair<unsigned int,
llvm::Attribute> *, __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<(lambda at
../lib/IR/Attributes.cpp:627:3)> > (stl_algo.h:161)
==29299== by...
2016 Nov 20
3
uninitialized values in Attributes.cpp
...: operator() (Attributes.cpp:627)
>> ==29299== by 0x13FCF12: operator()<const std::pair<unsigned int,
>> llvm::Attribute> *> (predefined_ops.h:234)
>> ==29299== by 0x13FCF12: __find_if<const std::pair<unsigned int,
>> llvm::Attribute> *, __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<(lambda at
>> ../lib/IR/Attributes.cpp:627:3)> > (stl_algo.h:140)
>> ==29299== by 0x13FCF12: __find_if<const std::pair<unsigned int,
>> llvm::Attribute> *, __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<(lambda at
>> ../lib/IR/Attributes.cpp:627:3)> >...
2020 Aug 23
2
MultiDatabase shard count limitations
...ipt/public-i libxapian.so.30.8.0 [.] std::__push_heap<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<Xapian::PostingIterator::Internal**, std::vector<Xapian::PostingIterator::Internal*, std::allocator<Xapian::PostingIterator::Internal*> > >, long, Xapian::PostingIterator::Internal*, __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_comp_val<Xapian::Internal::ComparePostListTermFreqAscending> >
0.06% /mnt/btr/public libc-2.28.so [.] __strchr_sse2
0.06% script/public-i perl [.] Perl_call_sv
0.06% /mnt/btr/public perl [.] Perl_pp_nextstate
0.06% p...
2020 Aug 21
2
MultiDatabase shard count limitations
Going back to the "prioritizing aggregated DBs" thread from
February 2020, I've got 390 Xapian shards for 130 public inboxes
I want to search against(*). There's more on the horizon (we're
expecting tens of thousands of public inboxes).
After bumping RLIMIT_NOFILE and running ->add_database a bunch,
the actual queries seem to be taking ~30s (not good :x).
Now I'm