search for: __op

...nclude/asm-i386/paravirt.h +++ b/include/asm-i386/paravirt.h @@ -332,210 +332,80 @@ unsigned paravirt_patch_insns(void *site * means that all uses must be wrapped in inline functions. This also * makes sure the incoming and outgoing types are always correct. */ -#define PVOP_CALL0(__rettype, __op) \ +#define __PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, pre, post, ...) \ ({ \ - __rettype __ret; \ - if (sizeof(__rettype) > sizeof(unsigned long)) { \ - unsigned long long __tmp; \ - unsigned long __ecx; \ - asm volatile(paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL) \ - : "=A" (__...

...nclude/asm-i386/paravirt.h +++ b/include/asm-i386/paravirt.h @@ -332,210 +332,80 @@ unsigned paravirt_patch_insns(void *site * means that all uses must be wrapped in inline functions. This also * makes sure the incoming and outgoing types are always correct. */ -#define PVOP_CALL0(__rettype, __op) \ +#define __PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, pre, post, ...) \ ({ \ - __rettype __ret; \ - if (sizeof(__rettype) > sizeof(unsigned long)) { \ - unsigned long long __tmp; \ - unsigned long __ecx; \ - asm volatile(paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL) \ - : "=A" (__...

The first patch really isn''t as much of a follow-up than what triggered the security issues to be noticed in the first place. 1: x86: preserve FPU selectors for 32-bit guest code 2: x86: fix XCR0 handling 3: x86/xsave: adjust state management 4: x86/fxsave: bring in line with recent xsave adjustments The first two I would see as candidates for 4.3 (as well as subsequent backporting,

Hi, I have a data.frame as following: var1 var2 1 ab_c_(ok) 2 okf789(db)_c 3 jojfiod(90).gt 4 "ij"_(78)__op 5 (iojfodjfo)_ab what I want is to create a new variable called "var3". the value of var3 is the content in the Parentheses. so var3 would be: var3 ok db 90 78 iojfodjfo how to do this? thanks, karena -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/question-a...

Hi Andi, This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces necessary for Xen. The brief overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack

Hi Andi, This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces necessary for Xen. The brief overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack

Hi Andi, Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day. Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering, cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery. Overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch No longer meaningful or needed. paravirt-nop.patch Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to

Hi Andi, Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day. Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering, cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery. Overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch No longer meaningful or needed. paravirt-nop.patch Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP and SMP guest support (NEW!) * dynamic ticks (NEW!) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes (non-PAE may be broken at the moment) * xen hvc console

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP and SMP guest support (NEW!) * dynamic ticks (NEW!) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes (non-PAE may be broken at the moment) * xen hvc console

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP and SMP guest support (NEW!) * dynamic ticks (NEW!) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes (non-PAE may be broken at the moment) * xen hvc console

...ed int video_mode, video_fl #define __HYPERVISOR_DS32 0xe010 #define __HYPERVISOR_DS __HYPERVISOR_DS64 +#define SYMBOLS_ORIGIN XEN_VIRT_START + /* For generic assembly code: use macros to define operation/operand sizes. */ #define __OS "q" /* Operation Suffix */ #define __OP "r" /* Operand Prefix */ --- 2009-07-10.orig/xen/tools/symbols.c 2009-07-13 13:56:07.000000000 +0200 +++ 2009-07-10/xen/tools/symbols.c 2009-07-01 09:53:36.000000000 +0200 @@ -108,10 +108,7 @@ static int read_symbol(FILE *in, struct else if (toupper((uint8_t)stype) == '...

This series consists of improvements to Xen''s ability to print traces of its own stack, and specifically for the stack overflow case to be able to use frame pointers in a debug build. I have dev tested the series in debug and non-debug cases, with and without memory guards, and I believe that all the stack traces look correct. However, I would greatly appreciate a second opinion on the

This series consists of improvements to Xen''s ability to print traces of its own stack, and specifically for the stack overflow case to be able to use frame pointers in a debug build. I have dev tested the series in debug and non-debug cases, with and without memory guards, and I believe that all the stack traces look correct (given the available information Xen has), and that the

...eturn op; +} + +static void +gpuva_op_free(struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr, + struct drm_gpuva_op *op) +{ + const struct drm_gpuva_fn_ops *fn = mgr->ops; + + if (fn && fn->op_free) + fn->op_free(op); + else + kfree(op); +} + +static int +drm_gpuva_sm_step(struct drm_gpuva_op *__op, + void *priv) +{ + struct { + struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr; + struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops; + } *args = priv; + struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr = args->mgr; + struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops = args->ops; + struct drm_gpuva_op *op; + + op = gpuva_op_alloc(mgr); + if (unlikely(!op)) + goto err; +...

...eturn op; +} + +static void +gpuva_op_free(struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr, + struct drm_gpuva_op *op) +{ + const struct drm_gpuva_fn_ops *fn = mgr->ops; + + if (fn && fn->op_free) + fn->op_free(op); + else + kfree(op); +} + +static int +drm_gpuva_sm_step(struct drm_gpuva_op *__op, + void *priv) +{ + struct { + struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr; + struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops; + } *args = priv; + struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr = args->mgr; + struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops = args->ops; + struct drm_gpuva_op *op; + + op = gpuva_op_alloc(mgr); + if (unlikely(!op)) + goto err; +...

...eturn op; +} + +static void +gpuva_op_free(struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr, + struct drm_gpuva_op *op) +{ + const struct drm_gpuva_fn_ops *fn = mgr->ops; + + if (fn && fn->op_free) + fn->op_free(op); + else + kfree(op); +} + +static int +drm_gpuva_sm_step(struct drm_gpuva_op *__op, + void *priv) +{ + struct { + struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr; + struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops; + } *args = priv; + struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr = args->mgr; + struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops = args->ops; + struct drm_gpuva_op *op; + + op = gpuva_op_alloc(mgr); + if (unlikely(!op)) + goto err; +...