search for: __need_

...d r207606 to 3.4.1 will resolve libstdc++ / glibc compatibility issues people have been having with 3.4: r201729: Teach Clang to provide ::max_align_t in C11 and C++11 modes) r202911: Headers: Provide an ABI compatible max_align_t when _MSC_VER is defined) r207606: Let stddef.h respect __need_{wchar_t, size_t, NULL, ptrdiff_t, wint_t}. The changes look safe to merge but I'd like to hear a second opinion from Chandler or Nico. Alp. -- http://www.nuanti.com the browser experts

...bc compatibility issues people have >> been having with 3.4: >> >> r201729: Teach Clang to provide ::max_align_t in C11 and C++11 modes) >> r202911: Headers: Provide an ABI compatible max_align_t when _MSC_VER >> is defined) >> r207606: Let stddef.h respect __need_{wchar_t, size_t, NULL, ptrdiff_t, >> wint_t}. >> >> The changes look safe to merge but I'd like to hear a second opinion from >> Chandler or Nico. >> > > I believe all of these are very safe, but I respect Tom's position here. > As he is managing the r...

...g with 3.4: > > > > r201729: Teach Clang to provide ::max_align_t in C11 and > > C++11 modes) > > r202911: Headers: Provide an ABI compatible max_align_t when > > _MSC_VER is defined) > > r207606: Let stddef.h respect __need_{wchar_t, size_t, NULL, > > ptrdiff_t, wint_t}. > > > > The changes look safe to merge but I'd like to hear a second > > opinion from Chandler or Nico. > > > > > > I believe all of these are very safe, but I respect Tom's...

On 02/05/2014 20:45, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > Bump. > > Is it really unsupported to build llvm from scratch with gcc 4.9 and > libstdc++ 4.9? Should I file a bugzilla ticket instead? Obviously LLVM/clang should compile out of the box using the current stable GCC version, and failure to do so would be a potential release blocker. Please file a PR Tom, do you know about this issue? Alp.