Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "__blk_request_all".
2014 Feb 18
2
[PATCH v4 RFC 0/3] virtio: add 'device_lost' to virtio_device
...gt; + /* Don't wait for completion, just drop queue. */
> + blk_abandon_queue(vblk->disk->queue);
Rusty,
but blk_abandon_queue() would not solve the incomplete in-flight
requests, would it? I suppose it would avoid additional in-flight
requests similar to __blk_request_all() and passing -EIO.
Ending of asynchronous in-flight requests still cause other problems
in the host. Such problems should be handled/avoided there, I suppose.
Heinz
> + else
> + blk_cleanup_queue(vblk->disk->queue);
> +
>
> Unfortunately blk_abandon_queue() does...
2014 Feb 18
2
[PATCH v4 RFC 0/3] virtio: add 'device_lost' to virtio_device
...gt; + /* Don't wait for completion, just drop queue. */
> + blk_abandon_queue(vblk->disk->queue);
Rusty,
but blk_abandon_queue() would not solve the incomplete in-flight
requests, would it? I suppose it would avoid additional in-flight
requests similar to __blk_request_all() and passing -EIO.
Ending of asynchronous in-flight requests still cause other problems
in the host. Such problems should be handled/avoided there, I suppose.
Heinz
> + else
> + blk_cleanup_queue(vblk->disk->queue);
> +
>
> Unfortunately blk_abandon_queue() does...
2014 Feb 20
0
[PATCH v4 RFC 0/3] virtio: add 'device_lost' to virtio_device
...#39;t wait for completion, just drop queue. */
>> + blk_abandon_queue(vblk->disk->queue);
> Rusty,
>
> but blk_abandon_queue() would not solve the incomplete in-flight
> requests, would it? I suppose it would avoid additional in-flight
> requests similar to __blk_request_all() and passing -EIO.
>
> Ending of asynchronous in-flight requests still cause other problems
> in the host. Such problems should be handled/avoided there, I suppose.
The device is going away (or gone away!), so it shouldn't be completing
requests, right?
If the device is actually bro...
2014 Jan 28
2
[PATCH v4 RFC 0/3] virtio: add 'device_lost' to virtio_device
On 23/01/14 05:51, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> Hi, here is my v4 patch-set update to the v3 RFC submitted on Nov 27th.
>
> Hi Heinz,
>
> I didn't get a response on my 'break all the virtqueues' patch
> series. Could your System Z code work with this?
>
> Rusty.
>
>
Sorry Rusty,
2014 Jan 28
2
[PATCH v4 RFC 0/3] virtio: add 'device_lost' to virtio_device
On 23/01/14 05:51, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Heinz Graalfs <graalfs at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> Hi, here is my v4 patch-set update to the v3 RFC submitted on Nov 27th.
>
> Hi Heinz,
>
> I didn't get a response on my 'break all the virtqueues' patch
> series. Could your System Z code work with this?
>
> Rusty.
>
>
Sorry Rusty,