search for: _0_

...that :-) BTW, it is 100% ALU and a major strain on the ALU LOAD. In other words, it's not a good benchmark for even CPU. That's why the 3-issue ALU in the Nx586 on-ward blows the 2-issue ALU in PPro on-ward (especially the P4) to crap. But that's all besides the point because it has _0_ to do with server performance period, even computationally intensive. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org

...ith event = 0 as event = 1 for each unique id. I can reshape or tapply my.df to group id and determine what sample size I need. my.df.cast= library(reshape) my.df.melt<-melt(my.df, id="id") my.df.cast<-cast(my.df.melt, id~value, length, fill=0) my.df.cast Event _id_ _0_ _1_ A 2 *1* B 1 *1* C 3 *2* Given the above dataframe I need to randomly select (sample) from my.df *one* observation from my.df[my.df$id==A & my.df$event==0], *one* from my.df[my.df$id==B & my.df$event==0], and* two* from my.df[my.df$id==C & my.df$event==...

http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz Looks like I managed to do a lot of changes today. So I'll wait a few more days before v1.0.1 release. The important changes since rc2: + deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to stderr and exit with EX_NOPERM instead of sending the rejection by executing sendmail. + dovecot --log-error logs now a warning, an error and a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I really do not agree with adding it to the base system. Just because you guys use sudo does not mean other people do. In fact many people do not have a use for sudo at all. Not every one gives out root accounts. You are only adding another utility In that can possibly be used to escalate privileges. Every time I secure a system I spend some time

...share: she would always get a sharing violation. After a day of reading Samba logs at debug 10 (_such_ fun [ ;) ]) and adding debug information so I could figure out what was up, I found some oddness in check_file_sharing. It was always reporting the MP3s as having a single share mode of op_type _0_, locked by the Samba server that was trying to do the rename. op_type 0 seemed to imply an unlocked share, so I went in to see if I could tweak the server to work in that case. A full patch (including a TON of DEBUG() changes) is included below -- in brief, though, I changed the test in check_fil...

...ith event = 0 as event = 1 for each unique id. I can reshape or tapply my.df to group id and determine what sample size I need.  my.df.cast= library(reshape) my.df.melt<-melt(my.df, id="id") my.df.cast<-cast(my.df.melt, id~value, length, fill=0) my.df.cast        Event _id_      _0_   _1_ A     2     *1* B     1     *1* C     3     *2* Given the above dataframe I need to randomly select (sample) from my.df *one* observation from my.df[my.df$id==A & my.df$event==0],  *one* from my.df[my.df$id==B & my.df$event==0], and* two* from my.df[my.df$id==C & my.df$event==...