search for: 9dr

...on pattern matching >From my opinion, it seems it is possible to do it... but I am not 100% sure... If anyone has information about it, please give me comment. Thanks JinGu Kang Software Engineer Codeplay Software Ltd Level C Argyle House, 3 Lady Lawson Street, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH3 9DR<http://maps.google.co.uk/?q=EH3%209DR> Tel: +44 (0)131 466 0503 Website: http://www.codeplay.com<http://www.codeplay.com/> Twitter: https://twitter.com/codeplaysoft This email and any attachments may contain confidential and /or privileged information and is for use by the addressee on...

...ut that shouldn't be required. It means tests that are generated using llc might be failing because they are wrongly identified as SSA. Thanks, -- Verena Beckham Senior Principal Software Engineer, Compilers Codeplay Software Ltd Level C, Argyle House, 3 Lady Lawson Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9DR Tel: 0131 466 0503 Fax: 0131 557 6600 Website: http://www.codeplay.com This email and any attachments may contain confidential and /or privileged information and is for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Codeplay Software Ltd immediately and delete...

...t the placement in this case in the DWARF spec. Since I am working on a custom target I'm afraid I can't provide any test cases... Thanks, -- Verena Beckham Senior Principal Software Engineer, Compilers Codeplay Software Ltd Level C, Argyle House, 3 Lady Lawson Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9DR Tel: 0131 466 0503 Fax: 0131 557 6600 Website: http://www.codeplay.com This email and any attachments may contain confidential and /or privileged information and is for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Codeplay Software Ltd immediately and delete...

...n. So it's not out-of-tree code. Am I missing something or should the assert condition be part of the "if" condition instead? Thanks, -- Verena Beckham Senior Principal Software Engineer, Compilers Codeplay Software Ltd Level C, Argyle House, 3 Lady Lawson Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9DR Tel: 0131 466 0503 Fax: 0131 557 6600 Website: http://www.codeplay.com This email and any attachments may contain confidential and /or privileged information and is for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Codeplay Software Ltd immediately and delete...

Hello everyone, Consider we have this following set of code: int foo() { int a,b; a = __builtin_XX(0x11); b = __builtin_XX(0x11); return a+b; } The problem currently is that LLVM eliminated the second call and copied the result from the first call into a new set of registers. Is there is a way to force LLVM to generate two explicit calls to a builtin function. The builtin takes in an integer

Hi folks, Not sure if this is the right mailing list target, but I'm trying out the new LLVM 7.0 packages found at http://apt.llvm.org by porting over an existing LLVM 6.0 project of ours to the new version. In doing so, I found that the executable always segfaulted at the same spot with no explanation: 0x0000000000fefe33 in

...>; def : ReadAdvance<ReadFoo, 3, [WriteType3]>; I have a patch for the second solution. Would that benefit any in-tree target? Thanks, Pierre-Andre -- Pierre-Andre Saulais Principal Software Engineer, Compilers Codeplay Software Ltd Level C, Argyle House 3 Lady Lawson St, Edinburgh EH3 9DR Tel: 0131 466 0503 Fax: 0131 557 6600 Website: http://www.codeplay.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/codeplaysoft This email and any attachments may contain confidential and /or privileged information and is for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Codepla...

...t this stage is not canonical? Also, I am not on tip (though I checked the TailDuplicator tip), so it is possible this is fixed elsewhere. Thanks! -- Verena Beckham Senior Principal Software Engineer, Compilers Codeplay Software Ltd Level C, Argyle House, 3 Lady Lawson Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9DR Tel: 0131 466 0503 Fax: 0131 557 6600 Website: http://www.codeplay.com This email and any attachments may contain confidential and /or privileged information and is for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Codeplay Software Ltd immediately and delete...

...____________ > LLVM Developers mailing listllvm-dev at lists.llvm.orghttp://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > -- > Alastair Murray > Principal Software Engineer, Compilers > Codeplay Software Ltd > Level C, Argyle House, 3 Lady Lawson St., Edinburgh, EH3 9DR > Tel: 0131 466 0503 > Fax: 0131 557 6600 > Website: http://www.codeplay.com > Twitter: https://twitter.com/codeplaysoft > > This email and any attachments may contain confidential and /or privileged information and > is for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intende...

...I have a patch for the second solution. Would that benefit any in-tree > target? > > Thanks, > Pierre-Andre > > -- > Pierre-Andre Saulais > Principal Software Engineer, Compilers > Codeplay Software Ltd > Level C, Argyle House > 3 Lady Lawson St, > Edinburgh EH3 9DR > Tel: 0131 466 0503 > Fax: 0131 557 6600 > Website: http://www.codeplay.com > Twitter: https://twitter.com/codeplaysoft > > This email and any attachments may contain confidential and /or privileged information and is for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended rec...

...hat benefit any in-tree >> target? >> >> Thanks, >> Pierre-Andre >> >> -- >> Pierre-Andre Saulais >> Principal Software Engineer, Compilers >> Codeplay Software Ltd >> Level C, Argyle House >> 3 Lady Lawson St, >> Edinburgh EH3 9DR >> Tel: 0131 466 0503 >> Fax: 0131 557 6600 >> Website: http://www.codeplay.com >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/codeplaysoft >> >> This email and any attachments may contain confidential and /or privileged information and is for use by the addressee only. If you...

Does anybody know if there is a particular reason why MCAsmStreamer doesn't have its own .h file? https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/0e66a5f53c74056f95d178c86531d7d9cfb23da9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp#L41 It seems like it is a good idea to have this class declared as its own module ( its own .cpp and .h files). That would make it easier to inherit from it if there is a need (like in my

Hello All, I have met a case with restrict keyword and I have a question about it. Let's look at a simple example. char buf[4]; void test(char *restrict a, char *restrict b, int count) {   for (unsigned i = 0; i < count; i++) {     *a = *b;     a++;     b++;     buf[i] = i;   } } I think there are no aliasing among pointers such as 'a', 'b' and 'buf'

On 06/11/2018 02:33 PM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev wrote: > On 6/11/2018 10:06 AM, jingu at codeplay.com via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I have met one may-alias case from llvm's alias analysis. The code >> snippet is as following: >> >> char buf[4]; >> >> void test (int idx) { >> char *a = &buf[3 - idx]; >> char *b =

Hello All, I have met one may-alias case from llvm's alias analysis. The code snippet is as following: char buf[4]; void test (int idx) { char *a = &buf[3 - idx]; char *b = &buf[idx]; *a = 1; *b = 2; } I can see below output from alias set tracker for above code snippet. Alias sets for function 'test': Alias Set Tracker: 1 alias sets for 2 pointer values.  

...9G-W-!=E1_^) Z>*%:;B[^PL1QGY)U3.5HK3>6&O%_C-90;0GQ_:24S;_Y+FM#1@^]QN!)_&TN Z:5+K6AVA06TJ-&::;\!=Q"/G<@+SAO^1KJ,KPZD#MDAN^^BCZG5]H5H?_:U> Z%+I:QT7G:A?NQC]C<QA''GG]#P$-9(,;8MDTZ><@8F#@*,J[/H^9T;Z8@AN)H Z3R!''SM6^FD>B_V>G1(M0&=L6UM%GAQ6-:[9DR\.N2;BSGG]#V4.A\IM1#=\( Z6A(XII"96/EHKL]O</5J#OH1(G1+M#,I_<(DUDJPT\I;_9T,=NHA0"$3=_)A ZW>Z$2I31>@T*Y`XEY@I\##$8%=J`(U))MJL\=&TUKED_^)5E#N''_83L-%E&O Z\)+P+?>,[??DB''P/T/DJ/&I'')3EZ8I97US_7?QC^)L>KA[A9%<M)MLC,Y6[Z Z]S=Y88E\Y=7)`BS73&q...