search for: 99.99

how to make this work, its seem to me that netfilter is changed more or less someplaces that shorewall do not support, using 4.4.27 shorewall and shorewall6 suggestion welcomed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99!

I am in the process of building a new machine to replace several older servers. I am considering running several virtual servers on one box, all linux for host and virtual machines using VirtualBox. Is it possible/advisable to configure shorewall on the host to act as a firewall for the virtual machines, each having one or more static public IP address? Any pointers, suggestions and/or

When reading a data set into R using readLines, na.strings="-99.99" is ignored. Is there an equivalent command for readLines? Alternatively, either immediately after reading into R or once the data set has been converted to a data frame, what is the appropriate command (or appropriate use of is.na) to convert my -99.99s to NAs? Thanks, Ben Osborne -- Botany Department University of

im trying to write a for loop so that every leap year, the number of days becomes to 366 instead of 365. could someone help me out? and also, this set of data has 99.99s I set all the 99.99 ==NA. however, when im doing the order function to find the max value of that year, it still reads 99.99 as the max value. Thank you very much maxday <- matrix(NA,63,5) for (a in 1948:2010){

Tom In Shorewall6 4.4.27 the following proxyndp entry: 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3 eth2 eth0 no no does not add the required route. The code produced in /var/lib/shorewall6/.restart is: qt $IP -6 route del 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2 run_ip route add 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2 Splitting the line into 2 separate lines: qt $IP -6 route del 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2

Hi All! Been quite a few years and lots of water under the bridge but here I am back! I have a customer that has now decided they need a bit more bandwidth over and above their fixed line! They are not in a good area for ADSL because of copper theft and being a bit to far from the closest DSLAM! They have installed a wireless link and I have made certain that put it behind my simple iptables

This, for example: v <- c(9.6996, 99.99) formatC(v, digits=3, format="g") shows: " 9.7" " 100" This is scientifically incorrect for the first number in the sense that I like to show all 3 significant digits, including trailing zero's. Is there a way that the first number would show as " 9.70"? By the way, can't use format() since it applies

I''d like to ask for clarification on the upgrade procedure using tarballs. In the past, with version 4.4, I have downloaded shorewall-4.4.x.y.tar.bz2 and shorewall6-4.4.x.y.tar.bz2, extracted each, and executed ''install.sh -s'' in each directory. Now there is a new package shorewall-core-4.5.x.y.tar.bz2. As I understand it, with version 4.5, this core package needs to be

Hi, Does anybody have an idea as to why dahdi_test results drop to unacceptable levels after doing a wanrouter stop/start using a Sangoma card? See below that it drops from 99.99% to 98.55%: [root at bin]# dahdi_test Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy... 99.999512% 99.992874% --- Results after 2 passes --- Best: 100.000 -- Worst: 99.993 -- Average: 99.996193, Difference:

Hello,   Are there general guidelines around on how to configure Shorewall for use with SIP phones ?  Especially regarding (some?) Cisco SIP phones which are expecting a reply at port 5060 while sending from an arbitrary high port. Thanks ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC,

Hi, I am trying to get L2TP roadwarrior VPN working from http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html#RW-L2TP but i am making a mistake somewhere, appreciate a fresh set of eyes to help. I have the following interfaces: ppp0 - interneteth0 - local networkrem - client openvpnl2tp - ppp for lt2p clients I am getting the following error logged when trying to connect into the server with L2TP from a remote

Hello Guys I have problem with internet bank. I have 2 Internet links balancing mode, thus the bank is charging connection down. I tried to force Internet traffic (port 80 and 443) for only a link, however it did not work. How do I make a setting to force the connection to these ports for a specific link. Note: I can not use the file as route_rules have neither the source IP (ltsp) nor of

Hello Mailinglist, please excuse my bad english - but I am not a native speaker. My Network looks like this: Internet --- dyn. IP --- Firewall (shorewall) --- LAN (192.168.X.X) No I try to connect my iphone (from mobile Internet G3) over VPN (l2tp/ipsec) with the firewall. But I can´t open the necessary Port 1701. /var/log/syslog ... Dec 30 00:24:29 router kernel: [226128.293757]

A SipPulse acaba de liberar o TFPS (www.tfps.co), solu??o para combate a fraudes de fomento de tr?fego internacional em telefonia. O sistema ? capaz de detectar 99.99% das tentaivas de fraude em tempo real. Durante o Webinar, abordaremos como proteger servidores Asterisk e Elastix/FreePBX de fraudes, medidas basicas como configura??o de firewall e remo??o de servi?os desnecess?rios e em seguida

Hi, I didn't do any serious benchmarking but so far I never found a case where LLVM does better than IAR on CortexM0, but I saw a lot of cases where IAR output is better than LLVM... That said I did not use -Os or -Oz, I just used -O3. A recurrent situation is that LLVM push/pop one or two extra registers compared to IAR, I guess it does so in order to comply with a standard ABI or

Hello, Running FC5 x86_64 with dovecot-1.0-0_8.beta3.rhfc5.at Using system user/passwds for 99.99% of users...have sql user/pass enabled to test virtual users from mysql. How do I strip off the domain when users provide user at domain.com so that my userdb and passdb use just 'user'? (disregarding sql auth...I'm not concerned with that right now). My dovecot.conf auth config:

In the past we have used Adtran Atlas 550's to break out FXS ports for devices like modems. The great thing about the 550 is that internally it is all TDM so there is absolutely zero latency. We are able to use ATA's for faxes and analog phones but devices that use modems, they fail 99.99% of the time when using an ATA. We tried to migrate to TA908 devices; they have FXS ports built

What about benchmarks on other Arm devices? On 02/26/2013 02:52 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Cortex-M0 is a Thumb1 only device. There hasn't been any concerted > effort to tune LLVM's Thumb1 output in quite a long time. Even back then > (2008 or so), the effort was mainly to get it to work acceptably, with > the real performance tuning work being done for Thumb2. I'm not >

Am 25.02.2016 um 03:25 schrieb Chandler Carruth: > I just want to clarify in case anyone is confused: I am in no way > suggesting that we would use pull requests, issues, or anything else as > part of the workflow for the test suite. I'm fine if folks want to talk > about that later, but I really view it as a separate discussion. Hm... then I guess I am confused about that