search for: 91e6

...bach menze@vitesse.com | | Vitesse Semiconductor GmbH & Co KG | | D-47057 Duisburg Pappenstr. 36 Tel. +49/203/306-1765 | | D-44149 Dortmund Borussiastr. 112 Tel. +49/231/6560-186 | | Key fingerprint = A36C 9660 6A1C 91E6 051E DF1A 573A 770B DD66 9D9F | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+

Hi all, I downloaded Samba 3.0.7 (gzipped) from samba.org to RedHat Linux, unzipper, and configured source. I got the following error during compilation Linking nsswitch/libnss_wins.so lib/system.po: In function `sys_dlopen': lib/system.po(.text+0xb37): undefined reference to `dlopen' lib/system.po: In function `sys_dlsym': lib/system.po(.text+0xb57): undefined reference to

...menze@vitesse.com | | Vitesse Semiconductor GmbH & Co KG | | D-47057 Duisburg Pappenstr. 36 Tel. +49/203/306-1765 | | D-44149 Dortmund Borussiastr. 112 Tel. +49/231/6560-186 | | Key fingerprint = A36C 9660 6A1C 91E6 051E DF1A 573A 770B DD66 9D9F | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Confidentiality Notice The information contained...

This question has already been asked in the past, but there was no answer. The above message is logged quite often in /var/log/samba/log.samba-dcerpcd. This is a stand-alone anonymous read-only server. Is it something to worry about? It smells like samba isn't working properly. If yes, how can I fix it? If no, how can I stop samba from logging un-interesting messages? What dcerpcd is

Dear all, A while ago I posted a message regading the way Samba is behaving and some problems that I was facing with Windows "loosing" the connection with the server... Here is another sample of what my /var/log/messages still looks like: Sep 19 15:08:01 Srv smbd-classic[3499]: [2004/09/19 15:08:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(436) Sep 19 15:08:01 Srv smbd-classic[3499]:

...h | | phone : ++49-203-306-1765 (work) ++49-160-98930847 (cellular) | | eMail : menze at dirac.ruhr.de | | GPG Key fingerprint = | | A36C 9660 6A1C 91E6 051E DF1A 573A 770B DD66 9D9F | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+

Hi, there is no firewall, all DCs are in the same subnet. here ist the output of a test, you can see, the CNAME guid entries in the _msdcs can be resolved on any DC: (DC1 and DC2 are the first and second DCs, SAMBA3 was added at last. ldbsearch -H /srv/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationId=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid # record 1 dn: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC2,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-