search for: 90w

...ith the mapping portion of this code states <- data.frame(map("state", plot=FALSE,xlim= c(-85,-75),ylim=c(33,37))[c("x","y")]) usamap<- ggplot(states)+geom_path(aes(x,y)) usamap When I plot this the problem is that the bounds of the plot is from 31N to 38N and 90W to 75W. The problem is that I only need the bounds of the plot to be from 33N to 37N and 85W to 75W. The way this is now, if I try to subset the states object, I get a garbled mess of lines. The rest of the code provides what I'm trying to do with the attached data. usamap + geom_point(dat...

Hi team! At work I have several small branch offices with ~5 PCs each. All PCs are member of a Samba4 domain, whose DCs are on the headquarters (linked by consumer grade VPNs) I want to ship "some small, cheap, reliable and magical device" to each branch, in order to provide just 2 things: * AD replication * File shares That't it, period. Nothing fancy. Suggestions??? What do you

...Allwinner A20 (1Gb mem/100Mb lan vs 2Gb mem/1Gb lan). Both have sata. The Wandboard quad is $40 more than the CT, but a quad cpu (vs duo). A number of linuxes are available for the various armv7 boards. The armv8s (64bit) are now coming out, but still pricey for my budget. But going from 70-90w with the SFF to 2-3w for the arm system is VERY attractive. If you REALLY want a Samba appliance you really have to focus on ARM. (IMHO).

...so all the 12V power goes to the TDM. For those who are curious, my setup: - Mini-ITX Cl0000 mobo with Via 1GHz Nehemiah CPU - 256MB DDR SDRAM - 2 x 2.5" HDD in RAID-1 configuration - 2 x TDM04B (for a total of 8 FXO module) - Trustix 2.0 with kernel 2.4.26 - Travla C137 Mini-ITX casing with 90W PSU. FYI.

My experience on situations like this is that it is almost always a bad battery.  Once load is removed, the voltage bounced back, and thus you show time/capacity, but it's possible that the sag under load drops you into LB, and causes the shutdown. If the UPS has a battery test, give it a try, or load test the battery external to the UPS if you can - I suspect that the UPS will be fine,

I've this error How i can find the problem? Apr 23 12:24:43 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:24:47 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:24:48 WARNING[131081]: PRI: !! Got a UA, but i'm in state 1 Apr 23 12:24:53 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:25:02 WARNING[131081]: PRI:

Well FWbuilder is NOT easy. The documentation does not match the current GUI. Now the box is locked up. I will have to pull it again, hook it up to a kybd/VGA and reset iptables.... Maybe Shoreline with webmin.... Problem is I want a REAL router/firewall with little work. Both public and private nets have routable addresses. No NATing for me! I just help write the RFC ;) And all the

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking