search for: 89a4faae

Can anyone think of a good reason to keep this CMake variable around? AFAICT llvm should never need to be compiled with exception support, and the same applies for clang, lldb, lld, and all (?) other LLVM subprojects. If there's no reason to keep this around I can just remove it entirely. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...why. RTTI makes sense -- they may well need it. But exceptions should work fine in the rest of the application even if LLVM is compiled with them, no? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140814/89a4faae/attachment.html>