Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "8999ms".
Did you mean:
999ms
2012 Aug 27
0
ping latency using vhost_net, macvtap and virtio
...cmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=0.112 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.1.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=0.117 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.1.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=0.119 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.1.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=0.128 ms
--- 172.16.1.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.109/0.120/0.145/0.011 ms
Pinging the same external host on the LAN from the guest, the latency
seems to be much higher:
# ping -c 10 172.16.1.1
PING 172.16.1.1 (172.16.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.16.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.206 ms
64 bytes from 172....
2012 Aug 27
0
ping latency using vhost_net, macvtap and virtio
...cmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=0.112 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.1.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=0.117 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.1.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=0.119 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.1.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=0.128 ms
--- 172.16.1.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.109/0.120/0.145/0.011 ms
Pinging the same external host on the LAN from the guest, the latency
seems to be much higher:
# ping -c 10 172.16.1.1
PING 172.16.1.1 (172.16.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.16.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.206 ms
64 bytes from 172....