Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "8583kib".
Did you mean:
8203kib
2018 Mar 20
0
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
...rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 2048B-2048B, (W) 2048B-2048B, (T) 2048B-2048B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
fio-3.1
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)][100.0%][r=0KiB/s,w=8662KiB/s][r=0,w=4331 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=45813: Tue Mar 20 15:12:02 2018
write: IOPS=4291, BW=8583KiB/s (8789kB/s)(256MiB/30541msec)
bw ( KiB/s): min= 7416, max=10264, per=99.94%, avg=8577.66, stdev=618.31, samples=61
iops : min= 3708, max= 5132, avg=4288.84, stdev=309.15, samples=61
cpu : usr=2.87%, sys=15.83%, ctx=262236, majf=0, minf=8
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=...
2018 Mar 20
2
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net>
wrote:
> Hi Raghavendra,
>
>
> On 20 Mar 2018, at 1:55 pm, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> Aggregating large number of small writes by write-behind into large writes
> has been merged on master:
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364
>
>