search for: 8203kib

...faces, and to lend support to the hypothesis that there is a definite transition (i.e., everything below a certain size will work, everything above a certain size fails): fdos_8000KiB works fdos_8125KiB works fdos_8180KiB works fdos_8192KiB works (8MiB) fdos_8200KiB works fdos_8202KiB works fdos_8203KiB works ----------------- fdos_8204KiB loops fdos_8205KiB loops fdos_8208KiB loops fdos_8215KiB loops fdos_8250KiB loops fdos_8500KiB loops fdos_9000KiB loops fdos_9216KiB loops (9MiB) Question: what's special about the transition from 8203KiB to 8204KiB? Both have CHS=8/64/32 and both involve...

On 07/08/2014 05:55 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 07/08/2014 03:05 PM, Alexander Perlis wrote: >> >> Question: what's special about the transition from 8203KiB to 8204KiB? >> Both have CHS=8/64/32 and both involve a fractional end cylinder. > > Fractional cylinders with floppy disks is almost certainly a very bad thing. > Agreed, but that doesn't appear to be the issue here. Fractional 8203K FreeDOS does work, yet larger values, inclu...

On 07/08/2014 03:05 PM, Alexander Perlis wrote: > > Question: what's special about the transition from 8203KiB to 8204KiB? > Both have CHS=8/64/32 and both involve a fractional end cylinder. > Fractional cylinders with floppy disks is almost certainly a very bad thing. -hpa

On 07/08/2014 04:42 PM, Alexander Perlis wrote: > On 07/08/2014 05:55 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 07/08/2014 03:05 PM, Alexander Perlis wrote: >>> >>> Question: what's special about the transition from 8203KiB to 8204KiB? >>> Both have CHS=8/64/32 and both involve a fractional end cylinder. >> >> Fractional cylinders with floppy disks is almost certainly a very bad >> thing. >> > > Agreed, but that doesn't appear to be the issue here. Fractional 8203K > Free...