Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "850mbps".
Did you mean:
50mbps
2008 Jan 27
1
[PATCH] virtio_net tx performance fix
...t the problem lies
when add_buf fails, it called notify and the host sends all the
pending tx pkts. When enable_cb was called, more_used(vq) returned
false so eventually the skb was dropped.
Moving notify from add_buf to enable_cb fixes this flow problem.
The tx performance boosted from 220Mbps to 850Mbps.
Signed-off-by: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index 3a28c13..592bbc9 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/dri...
2008 Jan 27
1
[PATCH] virtio_net tx performance fix
...t the problem lies
when add_buf fails, it called notify and the host sends all the
pending tx pkts. When enable_cb was called, more_used(vq) returned
false so eventually the skb was dropped.
Moving notify from add_buf to enable_cb fixes this flow problem.
The tx performance boosted from 220Mbps to 850Mbps.
Signed-off-by: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index 3a28c13..592bbc9 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/dri...
2004 Nov 17
9
serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem
Dear best guys,
I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates,
after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve
my performance problem (*laugh*):
(In short, see *** below)
Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI
Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device