search for: 50mbps

...en Asterisk is not doing anything on the Banana. The fact that you get the problem with the Thomson registered directly to DT, but with the traffic still going through the Banana, indicates to me that "Asterisk running on the Banana" is not the problem. > > Can you get the full 50Mbps through the Banana when you're doing a > > download of something biggish? > > What do you mean now? If I can use the full available band or if I can > download exactly 50Mbs? I don't see the difference - I'm asking whether the Banana can manage to route 50Mbps of traff...

Hi list! So, now I have a business contract and a technician was here to check the DSL... Nothing found, except that for 50Mbps I need now vectoring. Really nice... A couple of years ago I could get 50Mbps without vectoring. Of course, Deutsche Telekom said nothing about this change... Well, I got it working, and now I have 48Mbps down and 10Mbps up. I _REALLY CAN'T_ believe, that this is not enough... The problem wit...

...load of max 1, and it have 2 > cores... Multi-core CPUs are only a benefit if you can run separate applications (or at least separate threads of an application) on the separate cores. I'm not sure Asterisk can do this for a single call. > The LAN interface is Gbps, and my DSL is only 50Mbps, so it is not > possible to get it full of band... Can you get the full 50Mbps through the Banana when you're doing a download of something biggish? > Last but not least: I tried calls via Skype and WhatsApp (with my phone > in my WLAN). No problem and very good quality, so the Bana...

...ion) on the separate cores. Yes, of course. > I'm not sure Asterisk can do this for a single call. But of course the BananaPI can handle that Asterisk uses a core and reserve the rest (or part of it) to manage the PPPoE connection... >> The LAN interface is Gbps, and my DSL is only 50Mbps, so it is not >> possible to get it full of band... > > Can you get the full 50Mbps through the Banana when you're doing a download of > something biggish? What do you mean now? If I can use the full available band or if I can download exactly 50Mbs? The answer to the first qu...

...ca Bertoncello Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 10:49 AM To: Asterisk Users <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Subject: [asterisk-users] Voice broken during calls (again...) Hi list! So, now I have a business contract and a technician was here to check the DSL... Nothing found, except that for 50Mbps I need now vectoring. Really nice... A couple of years ago I could get 50Mbps without vectoring. Of course, Deutsche Telekom said nothing about this change... Well, I got it working, and now I have 48Mbps down and 10Mbps up. I _REALLY CAN'T_ believe, that this is not enough... The problem wit...

Hi list! Am 22.06.2020 um 16:48 schrieb Luca Bertoncello: > Hi list! > > So, now I have a business contract and a technician was here to check > the DSL... > Nothing found, except that for 50Mbps I need now vectoring. Really > nice... A couple of years ago I could get 50Mbps without vectoring. > Of course, Deutsche Telekom said nothing about this change... > > Well, I got it working, and now I have 48Mbps down and 10Mbps up. > I _REALLY CAN'T_ believe, that this is not e...

Hi, I know some of you are very experienced as to the working of networks. I wondered whether there is some accepted way of determining bandwidth needs based on the network traffic over time. For example, looking at the figures for the network traffic through the server interface, we have hourly, daily and monthly figures. If everything were linear, taking the hourly figure and dividing it by

Am 22.06.20 um 16:48 schrieb Luca Bertoncello: > Hi list! > > So, now I have a business contract and a technician was here to check > the DSL... > Nothing found, except that for 50Mbps I need now vectoring. Really > nice... A couple of years ago I could get 50Mbps without vectoring. > Of course, Deutsche Telekom said nothing about this change... > > Well, I got it working, and now I have 48Mbps down and 10Mbps up. > I _REALLY CAN'T_ believe, that this is not e...

On Wednesday 04 December 2019 at 07:37:51, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Am 03.12.2019 um 19:28 schrieb Luca Bertoncello: > > Hi again > > > This delay happens on every peer, Deutsche Telekom and Messagenet, so I > > think the problem is NOT by the Provider, but in my configuration... > > Maybe I got the solution... > I see, that I had the jitter buffer active. As

...this DSL link to soem SIP provider, who then connects you to the PSTN, or > are you connecting Asterisk locally to the phone line via some ATA device? Deutsche Telekom uses since years just VoIP. No ISDN, PSTN, and so on... :( I'm connecting to the VoIP-Server of Deutsche Telekom via DSL (50Mbps down, 10Mbps up). The other party use VoIP, too, since they are in Germany (and Italy) and here there are just VoIP... Sigh! Now I disabled the jitter (jbenable = no), and I called my father in law. He sayd me, the quality is really better, but I hear sometimes little noises... Any other suggesti...

Hi, We are working on a product to analyze pcap files of VoIP calls. So far it does a reasonable job of analyzing the frequency distribution of packets in both directions, pointing out which direction packet loss / bad jitter occurs.  If you can trap the traffic on the outside and the inside of your Banana Pi and send me the pcap files, I would be happy to run it through our analyzer as

...OS but to what extent? In its simplest form I only really want to upload CentOS 5.2 to my RapidShare account for speed. I had to download it twice this weekend at two difference remote sites and sometimes the mirror was a bit slow. Generally they are quite fast but I mean with RapidShare I can get 50Mbps compared to normal 6-10Mbps from some mirrors. I understand it depends on the line I am downloading from and the load on the mirror etc but because fools like myself and many others have paid RapidShare accounts we can download things super quick with a vary reliable supplier. I am wondering why I...

...load, until some bandwith is freed by another client who finished a download. Note: I would rather go with "tcng" than with the old "tc". The Problem: ============ While playing with tcng and HTB I managed to shape traffic (to limit the total bandwith for HTTP traffic to e.g. 50Mbps) but I did not manage to write a tcng configuration which guarantees a certain bandwith per client request. I must be able to assign (and guarantee) a defined bandwith to a client request, to make the downloads more predictable. My experiments so far only allowed me to limit e.g. HTTP traffic, whic...

Folks, I''m playing with maxbw on links (as opposed to flows) in Crossbow, and I have a couple of questions. First, the limts seem only advisory. The first example has the main host talking to a zone that has 172.16.17.100 configured on znic0. When there is no maxbw, the throughtput is as expected; when maxbw is 55M the throughput only drops to 76 Mbps: # netperf -H

...s of the above might point out that the Pi isn't *sending* packets > it should be, or sending them way late, in which case the issue is > actually your hardware. Well, during the calls, the BananaPI has a load of max 1, and it have 2 cores... The LAN interface is Gbps, and my DSL is only 50Mbps, so it is not possible to get it full of band... And during the test as I connected the phone to the Telekom servers the load of the BananaPI was lower as 1. Last but not least: I tried calls via Skype and WhatsApp (with my phone in my WLAN). No problem and very good quality, so the BananaPI does...

...way to specify a percentage of the total bandwidth on a link for a flow, what is the best way to gauge the effective bandwidth in absolute terms, and then emulate bandwidth distribution by percentage for flows ? For example, if I could figure out that the effective network bandwidth for a link is 50Mbps, and I want to create 2 flows on it, each of equal priority, then I would give them a max bandwidth of 25Mbps each. The motto is to not let the user bother about using absolute numbers for bandwidth control. He just specifies a % for the flow, and we are somehow able to map that onto an absolute nu...

...ttl 255 ip addr add 192.18.0.1 dev tun0 ip route add 192.18.0.2 dev tun0 ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 dev tun0 I change the remote and local ip and setup the tunnel ad the other end. The tunnel is up and i am able to send data through the tunnel. But its very slow. Without the tunnels i could send 50Mbps and with the tunnels its aroud 1-2 Mbps. --- Kernel Config --- -- CONFIG_NETFILTER=y # CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_FILTER is not set CONFIG_UNIX=y CONFIG_INET=y CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_NA...

I'm looking for some kind of appliance like box, maybe something like this:http://www.soekris.com/net5501.htm on which I could deploy iptables based firewall/openvpn/DNS and other local network services in a wide area network. I would probably install on a flash device. I would prefer something that was relatively easy to install on, or at least has been used with CentOS before, where

...lds shaping video, citrix, and VoIP all at one site (plus regular internet etc). The current build takes about 2.5 MB on CF and I should have that paired down further before long. Havn''t had the chance to do any stress testing yet, but the manufacturer of the board claims that you can get 50Mbps routed through it. Once I add Layer 7 filtering I doubt we''ll be able to sustain that though. Thanks, -Ron

..._udp.tel.t-online.de SRV > > e.g. (don't know the hostname for the business infrastructure) I have a forwarding to the DNS servers of Telekom configured in my bind, since the Gateway has to manage the internal domains, too... Regarding the ping time: wich line do you have? I have a DSL 50Mbps. Maybe your times are better due to a faster line? What is your opinion about the tests I did today with the friend and his phone as VoIP-peer? Thanks Luca Bertoncello (lucabert at lucabert.de)