Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "84gb".
Did you mean:
4gb
2016 Mar 23
2
Re: /proc/meminfo
...03/23/2016 12:10 PM, Peter Steele wrote:
>> Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2 and some
>> of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation in
>> /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of memory and
>> 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong.
>>
> There was a meminfo bug here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300781
>
> The initial report is fixed in git, however the reporter also mentioned the
> issue you are seeing. I suspect something is going...
2016 Mar 23
7
/proc/meminfo
Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2
and some of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation
in /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of
memory and 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong.
# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 9007199254740991 kB
MemFree: 9007199224543267 kB
MemAvailable: 12985680 kB
Buffers: 0 kB
Cached: 119744 kB
SwapCached: 10804 kB
Active: 110228 kB
Inactive:...
2016 Mar 23
0
Re: /proc/meminfo
On 03/23/2016 12:10 PM, Peter Steele wrote:
> Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2 and some
> of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation in
> /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of memory and
> 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong.
>
There was a meminfo bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300781
The initial report is fixed in git, however the reporter also mentioned the
issue you are seeing. I suspect something is going wacky with the memory
values w...
2016 Mar 23
0
Re: /proc/meminfo
...PM, Peter Steele wrote:
>>> Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2 and some
>>> of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation in
>>> /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of memory and
>>> 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong.
>>>
>> There was a meminfo bug here:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300781
>>
>> The initial report is fixed in git, however the reporter also mentioned the
>> issue you are seeing. I...
2016 Mar 24
0
Re: /proc/meminfo
Hi all
> Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2
> and some of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation
> in /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of
> memory and 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong.
yes, it's occured time to time on our installations.
Centos 7.2 + libvirt 1.2.18 and probably on 1.3.2
We have workaround for fix it without reboot LXC container.
1) check that on HW node exists cgroups memory for container.
[root@node]# cat
/s...
2016 Apr 26
0
Re: /proc/meminfo
...3/23/16, Peter Steele <pwsteele@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone seen this issue? We're running containers under CentOS 7.2
> and some of these containers are reporting incorrect memory allocation
> in /proc/meminfo. The output below comes from a system with 32G of
> memory and 84GB of swap. The values reported are completely wrong.
>
> # cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal: 9007199254740991 kB
> MemFree: 9007199224543267 kB
> MemAvailable: 12985680 kB
> Buffers: 0 kB
> Cached: 119744 kB
> SwapCached: 10804 kB
>...
2010 Mar 23
1
[RFC] vhost-blk implementation
...e done simple tests to see how it performs. I got very
encouraging results on sequential read tests. But on sequential
write tests, I see degrade over virtio-blk. I can't figure out and
explain why. Can some one shed light on whats happening here ?
Read Results:
=============
Test does read of 84GB file from the host (through virtio). I unmount
and mount the filesystem on the host to make sure there is nothing
in the page cache..
with vhost-blk:
----------------
# time dd if=/dev/vda of=/dev/null bs=128k iflag=direct
640000+0 records in
640000+0 records out
83886080000 bytes (84 GB) copied...
2010 Mar 23
1
[RFC] vhost-blk implementation
...e done simple tests to see how it performs. I got very
encouraging results on sequential read tests. But on sequential
write tests, I see degrade over virtio-blk. I can't figure out and
explain why. Can some one shed light on whats happening here ?
Read Results:
=============
Test does read of 84GB file from the host (through virtio). I unmount
and mount the filesystem on the host to make sure there is nothing
in the page cache..
with vhost-blk:
----------------
# time dd if=/dev/vda of=/dev/null bs=128k iflag=direct
640000+0 records in
640000+0 records out
83886080000 bytes (84 GB) copied...
2007 Aug 07
4
Will this work? server+centOS5+100users?
I am an experienced MS administrator of W2003 servers & Exchange systems.
I have 5+ years UNIX mid-level experience but not in centOS. Grounded in SCO UNIX (the real SCO UNIX).
We want to use CentOS on a recently grave yarded Dell poweredge 400SC server.
This is a P4 3.0 Ghz, w/4GB memory, 2 SATA 250 GB disks.
We want to use this server w/CentOS5, to provide file and print resources to 100